Skip to main content
Log in

Coordination and cooperation in asymmetric commons dilemmas

  • Published:
Experimental Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we discuss laboratory experiments that address the problem of self-governance in an asymmetric commons dilemma. Small-scale irrigation systems that provide food for hundreds of millions of people around the world are probably the most common example of such dilemmas. Here, we formulate an abstract dilemma in which subjects make both a decision about investment in the provision of infrastructure associated with the use of a resource and about how much to extract from the common-pool resource made available by this infrastructure. The impact of inherent asymmetry in irrigation systems on the provision of a resource and the impact of communication on the capacity of the group to solve the two-level commons dilemma of cooperation and coordination based on the analysis of the experimental data are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balliet, D. (2010). Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analytic review. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bochet, O., Page, T., & Putterman, L. (2006). Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(1), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budescu, D. V., & Au, W. T. (2002). A model of sequential effects in common pool resource dilemmas. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F., & Fehr, E. (2006). When does “Economic Man” dominate social behavior? Science, 311, 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifdaloz, O., Regmi, A., Anderies, J. M., & Rodriguez, A. A. (2010). Understanding robustness in small-scale social-ecological systems: the Pumpa Irrigation System in Nepal. Ecology and Society, 15(3), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R. T. A., & Marks, M. B. (2000). Step returns in threshold public goods: a meta- and experimental analysis. Experimental Economics, 2(3), 239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review, 90, 980–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1049–1074.

  • Hackett, S., Schlager, E., & Walker, J. M. (1994). The role of communication in resolving commons dilemmas: experimental evidence with heterogeneous appropriators. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. C. (1988). Size and structure of authority in canal irrigation systems. Journal of Anthropological Research, 44(4), 335–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, R. M., & Walker, J. M. (1988a). Group size effects in public goods provision: the voluntary contribution mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, R. M., & Walker, J. M. (1988b). Communication and free-riding behavior: the voluntary contributions mechanism. Economic Inquiry, 585–608.

  • Isaac, R. M., Walker, J. M., & Williams, A. W. (1994). Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods: experimental evidence utilizing large groups. Journal of Public Economics, 54(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M. A., Holahan, R., Lee, A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Lab experiments to study social-ecological systems. Science, 328, 613–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M. A., Bousquet, F., Cardenas, J. C., Castillo, D., & Worrapimphong, K. (2011). Field experiments on irrigation dilemmas (submitted).

  • Lansing, J. S. (1991). Priests and programmers: technologies of power in the engineered landscape of Bali. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard, J. O. (1995). Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel & A. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1992). Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. San Francisco: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Walker, J. M., & Gardner, R. (1992). Convenants with and without a sword—self-governance is possible. The American Political Science Review, 86(2), 404–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., & Gardner, R. (1993). Copying with asymmetries in the commons: self-governing irrigation systems can work. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(4), 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata (2nd ed.). College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1997). Order of play in strategically equivalent games in extensive forms. International Journal of Game Theory, 26, 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittfogel, K. A. (1957). Oriental despotism: a comparative study of total power. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco A. Janssen.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix to Coordination and Cooperation in Asymmetric Commons Dilemmas (DOC 545 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janssen, M.A., Anderies, J.M. & Joshi, S.R. Coordination and cooperation in asymmetric commons dilemmas. Exp Econ 14, 547–566 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9281-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9281-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation