Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying the ecological conditions that select for intermediate levels of aposematic signalling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemically defended species often have conspicuous signals that warn potential predators of these defences. Recent evidence suggests that some such aposematic prey are not as conspicuous as possible, even though increased conspicuousness would bring additional anti-predator benefits. Here we present a simple model to explore the generality of these observations. Our model predicts that optimal fitness will often be achieved at an intermediate level of conspicuousness and not simply by maximising conspicuousness. This comes about because of the ubiquitous trade-off that increased conspicuousness has an ecological cost in increasing the encounter rate with predators, as well as a benefit in terms of enhancing learned aversion by predators of defended prey. However, importantly, we also predict that a small deviation away from maximal crypsis generally causes a decrease in fitness, even if a larger deviation would lead to an intermediate level of conspicuousness that maximises fitness. Hence, further consideration of whether intermediate levels of aposematism are as common in nature as predicted in this model will require consideration of the underlying evolution of appearance, and the plausibility of evolution across the fitness trough, from maximal crypsis to an intermediate level of aposematism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chiari Y, Vences M, Vieites DR, Rabemananjara F, Bora P, Ravoahangimalala OR, Meyer A (2004) New evidence for parallel evolution of colour patterns in Malagasy poison frogs (Mantella). Mol Ecol 13:3763–3774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darst CR, Cummings ME, Cannatella DC (2006) A mechanism for diversity in warning signals: conspicuousness versus toxicity in poison frogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5852–5857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA, Mappes J (2004) Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals. Am Nat 163:532–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engen S, Järvi T, Wiklund C (1986) The evolution of aposematic coloration by individual selection–a life-span survival model. Oikos 46:397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamberale-Stille G (2000) Decision time and prey gregariousness influence attack probability in naive and experienced predators. Anim Behav 60:95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gamberale-Stille G (2001) Benefit by contrast: an experiment with live aposematic prey. Behav Ecol 12:768–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamberale G, Tullberg BS (1996) Evidence for a more effective signal in aggregated aposematic prey. Anim Behav 52:597–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamberale G, Tullberg BS (1998) Aposematism and gregariousness: the combined effect of group size and coloration on signal repellence. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 265:889–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman JL, Harvey PH (1980) Why are distasteful prey not cryptic? Nature 28:897–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford T (1992) Predator psychology and the evolution of prey coloration. In: Crawley MJ (ed) Natural enermies: the population biology of predators, parasites and diseases. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagman M, Forsman A (2003) Correlated evolution of conspicuous coloration and body size in poison frogs (dendrobatidae). Evolution 57:2904–2910

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DJ, Marples NM (2004) The effects of novel odour and colour cues on food acceptance by the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 68:1049–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimar O, Enquist M, Sillén-Tullberg B (1986) Evolutionary stability of aposematic coloration and prey unprofitability–a theoretical-analysis. Am Nat 128:469–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Mappes J, Riipi M, Vertainen L (1999) Can aposematic signals evolve by gradual change? Nature 397:249–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallet J, Singer MC (1987) Individual selection, kin selection, and the shifting balance in the evolution of warning colors–the evidence from butterflies. Biol J Linnean Soc 32:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merilaita S, Tullberg BS (2005) Constrained camouflage facilitates the evolution of conspicuous warning coloration. Evolution 59:38–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki N (2005) A common mechanism explaining the evolution of female-limited and both-sex Batesian mimicry in butterflies. J Anim Ecol 74:728–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper TJ, Redston S (1987) Conspicuousness of distasteful prey affects the strength and durability of one-trial avoidance-learning. Anim Behav 35:739–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos JC, Coloma LA, Cannatella DC (2003) Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:12792–12797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler W, Roper TJ (1992) Responses to warning coloration in avian predators. Adv Stud Behav 21:111–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqi A, Cronin TW, Loew ER, Vorobyev M, Summers K (2004) Interspecific and intraspecific views of color signals in the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio. J Exp Biol 207:2471–2485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sillén-Tullberg B (1985) Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug. Oecologia 67:411–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelhorn J, Rowe C (2006a) Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence. Biol Lett 2:348–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skelhorn J, Rowe C (2006b) Taste-rejection by predators and the evolution of unpalatability in prey. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:550–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speed MP (2000) Warning signals, receiver psychology and predator memory. Anim Behav 60:269–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speed MP, Ruxton GD (2007) How Nasty and how bright: explaining diversity in warning signal strength. Evolution 61:623–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Summers K, Clough ME (2001) The evolution of coloration and toxicity in the poison frog family (Dendrobatidae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6227–6232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tullberg BS Merilaita S, Wiklund C (2005) Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva. In: Proceedings of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 272:1315–1321

  • Vences M, Kosuch J, Boistel R, Haddad CFB, La Marca E, Lotters S, Veith M (2003) Convergent evolution of aposematic coloration in Neotropical poison frogs: a molecular phylogenetic perspective. Org Divers Evol 3:215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace AR (1867) Proceedings of the Entomological Society of London March 4th: IXXX-IXXXi

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful suggestions. Mike Speed was supported by a research fellowship awarded by the Leverhulme Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. P. Speed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruxton, G.D., Speed, M.P. & Broom, M. Identifying the ecological conditions that select for intermediate levels of aposematic signalling. Evol Ecol 23, 491–501 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-008-9247-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-008-9247-3

Keywords

Navigation