Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of cereals for weed suppression in organic agriculture: a method based on cultivar sensitivity to weed growth

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cereal cultivars conferring a high degree of crop competitive ability, especially against aggressive weeds, are highly beneficial in organic farming as well as other farming systems that aim to limit the use of herbicides. In this study, thirteen winter wheat cultivars, plus one spring wheat and one winter oat were assessed for their competitive ability at key growth stages, across three seasons. The natural population of weed species was allowed develop without agronomic intervention. Weed suppression ability for each cultivar (S var) was calculated as the difference between weed growth in plots for each cultivar and the maximal weed growth (W max) from adjacent uncropped areas. The sensitivity of S var in response to changes in weed growth (S Wvar ) was derived from the linear regression coefficient of S var plotted against W max. There was significant variation in S var between cultivars and strong evidence for cultivars to vary in S Wvar . Amongst groups of cultivars with similar levels of S var some could be defined as being of higher or lower sensitivity to changes in weed growth. Some cultivars also had relatively good S var at high levels of weed growth. The use of both weed suppression ability and sensitivity across different levels of weed growth or weed populations has considerable potential for selecting new cultivars suitable for organic agriculture. Ideally new cultivars will be selected on the basis of high S var and/or low S Wvar . This analysis provides the means to measure sensitivity of cultivar performance across a range of favourable and unfavourable conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acciaresi HA, Chidichimo Ho, Sarondon SJ (2001) Traits related to competitive ability of wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties against Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Biol Agric Hortic 19:275–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertholdsson N-O (2005) Early vigour and allelopathy—two useful traits for enhanced barley and wheat competitiveness against weeds. Weed Res 45:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge LE, Naylor REL (1999) Options for organic weed control—what farmers do. In: Proceedings 1999 Brighton crop protection conference: weeds, pp 939–944

  • Bond W, Grundy AC (2001) Non-chemical weed management in organic farming systems. Weed Res 41:383–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan JP, Lemerle D, Martin P (2001) Economics of increasing wheat competitiveness as a weed control weapon. Contributed paper presented to the 45th annual conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society

  • Coleman RD, Gill GS, Rebetzke GJ (2001) Identification of quantitative trait loci for traits conferring weed competitiveness in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Aust J Agric Res 52:1235–1246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cosser ND, Gooding JM, Thompson AJ, Froud-Williams RJ (1997) Competitive ability and tolerance of organically grown wheat cultivars to natural weed infestations. Ann Appl Biol 130:523–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousens RD, Barnett AG, Barry GC (2003) Dynamics of competition between wheat and oats: I. Effects of changing the time of phenological events. Agron J 95:1293–1304

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vida FBP, Laca EA, Mackill DJ, Fernandez GM, Fischer AJ (2006) Relating rice traits to weed competitiveness and yield: a path analysis. Weed Sci 54:1122–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didon UME, Hansson ML (2002) Competition between six spring barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare L.) cultivars and two weed flora in relation to interception of photosynthetic active radiation. Biol Agric Hortic 20:257–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14:742–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson KD, Fischer AJ, Foin TC, Hill JE (2003) Crop traits related to weed suppression in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Weed Sci 51:87–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gooding MJ, Thompson AJ, Davies WP (1993) Interception of photosynthetically active radiation, competitive ability and yield of organically grown wheat varieties. Asp Appl Biol, Physiol Varieties 34:355–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoad SP, Neuhoff, Davies DHK (2005) Field evaluation and selection of winter wheat for competitiveness against weeds. In: Proceedings of the COST SUSVAR/ECO-PB workshop on organic plant breeding strategies and the use of molecular markers, Driebergen, Netherlands, pp 61–66

  • Hoad SP, Davies DHK, Topp CFE (2006a) How to select varieties for organic farming: science and practice. Aspects of Applied Biology 79. What will organic farming deliver? COR 2006 Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh 18–20 September 2006, pp 117–120

  • Hoad SP, Davies DHK, Topp CFE (2006b) Designing crops for low input and organic systems: Enhancing wheat competitive ability against weeds. In: Proceedings crop protection in Northern Britain, pp 157–162

  • Huel DG, Hucl P (1996) Genotype variation for competitive ability in spring wheat. Plant Breed 115:325–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirigwi FM, van Ginkel M, Trethowan R, Sears RG, Rajaram S, Paulsen GM (2004) Evaluation of selection strategies for wheat adaptation across water regimes. Euphytica 135:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korres NE, Froud-Williams RJ (2002) Effects of winter wheat cultivars and seed rate on the biological characteristics of naturally occurring weed flora. Weed Res 42:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lammerts van Bueren ET, Struik PC, Jacobsen NE (2002) Ecological concepts in organic farming and their consequences for an organic crop ideotype. Neth J Agric Sci 50:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gouis J, Béghin D, Heumez E, Pluchard P (2000) Genetic differences for nitrogen uptake and nitrogen utilisation efficiencies in winter wheat. Eur J Agron 12:163–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Cousens RD, Coombes NE (1996) The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Res 36:505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemerle D, Gill GS, Murphy CE, Walker SR, Cousens RD, Mokhtari S, Peltzer SJ, Coleman R, Luckett DJ (2001) Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhance wheat competitiveness with weeds. Aust J Agric Res 52:527–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemerle D, Smith A, Verbeek B, Koetz E, Lockley P, Martin P (2006) Incremental crop tolerance to weeds: a measure for selecting competitive ability in Australian wheats. Euphytica 149:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason HE, Spaner D (2006) Competitive ability of wheat in conventional and organic management systems; a review of the literature. Can J Plant Sci 86:333–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff D, Hoad S, Köpke U, Davies K, Gawronski S, Gawronska H, Drews S, Juroszek P, de Lucas Bueno C, Zanoli R (2005) Strategies of weed control in organic farming (WECOF). Final Report of FP 5 European Combined Project ‘WECOF’, online publication: http://www.wecof.uni-bonn.de

  • Saulescu NN, Ittu G, Mustatea P, Simion G (2005) Improved nitrogen response as an objective in wheat breeding. Rom Agric Res 22:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Tottman DR, Broad H (1987) The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations. Ann Appl Biol 110:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truberg B, Huhn M (2002) Contributions to the analysis of genotype × environment interactions: comparison of different parametric and non-parametric tests for interactions with emphasis on crossover interactions. J Agron Crop Sci 185:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson PR, Derksen DA, van Acker RC (2006) The ability of 29 barley cultivars to compete and withstand competition. Weed Sci 54:783–792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe M, Lammerts van Bueren ET, Baresel JP, Desclaux D, Goldringer I, Hoad S, Kovacs G, Löschenberger F, Miedaner T, Osman AM, Østergård H (2008) Developments in breeding cereals for organic agriculture. Euphytica. doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9690-9

  • Zhao DL, Atlin GN, Bastiaans L, Spiertz JHJ (2006) Cultivar weed-competitiveness in aerobic rice: heritability, correlated traits, and the potential for indirect selection in weed-free environments. Crop Sci 46:372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for funding from the EU and the Scottish Government and would like to acknowledge the support of our research partners from Bonn, Madrid and Warsaw in the EU funded project on ‘Strategies of Weed Control in Organic Farming (WECOF)’. The authors would also like to acknowledge the support of colleagues in the COST Action 860 on ‘Sustainable low-input cereal production: required variety characteristics and crop diversity’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Hoad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoad, S., Topp, C. & Davies, K. Selection of cereals for weed suppression in organic agriculture: a method based on cultivar sensitivity to weed growth. Euphytica 163, 355–366 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9710-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9710-9

Keywords

Navigation