Skip to main content
Log in

Leaf type is not associated with ascochyta blight disease in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The three major leaf types in chickpea are normal compound leaf, simple leaf and multipinnate. Simple leaf types are less commonly cultivated worldwide and are often reputed to be susceptible to ascochyta blight disease, whereas other leaf types range from resistant to susceptible. This study determined the association between host plant resistance to ascochyta blight and different leaf types in segregating populations derived from crosses between disease resistant and susceptible chickpea genotypes. In addition, the inheritance of disease resistance and leaf type was investigated in intraspecific progeny derived from crosses between two resistant genotypes with normal leaf type (ICC 3996 and Almaz), one susceptible simple leaf type (Kimberley Large) and one susceptible multipinnate leaf type (24 B-Isoline). Our results showed that, in these segregating populations, susceptibility to ascochyta blight was not linked to multipinnate or simple leaf types; resistance to ascochyta blight depended more on genetic background than leaf shape; leaf type was controlled by two genes with a dihybrid supplementary gene action; normal leaf type was dominant over other leaf types; and inheritance of ascochyta blight resistance was controlled by two major genes, one dominant and one recessive. Since there was no linkage between ascochyta blight susceptibility and leaf type, breeding various leaf types with ascochyta blight resistance is a clear possibility. These results have significant implications for chickpea improvement, as most current extra large seeded kabuli varieties have a simple leaf type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Athwal DS (1963) Some X-ray induced and spontaneous mutations in Cicer. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 23:50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfil DJ, Goren O, Mufradi I, Lichtenzveig J, Abbo S (2007) Development of early-flowering Kabuli chickpea with compound and simple leaves. Plant Breed 126:125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CL, Madden LV (1990) Temporal analysis of epidemics. I. Description and comparison of disease progress curves. In: Introduction to plant disease epidemiology. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 161–202

  • Collard BCY, Pang ECK, Ades PK, Taylor PWJ (2003) Preliminary investigation of QTLs associated with seedling resistance to ascochyta blight from Cicer echinospermum, a wild relative of chickpea. Theor Appl Genet 107:719–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahiya BS, Waldia RS, Kumar R (1988) Relationship between leaf and seed characteristics in chickpea. Int Chickpea Newsl 18:6–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Danehloueipour N, Yan G, Clarke HJ, Siddique KHM (2006) Successful stem cutting propagation of chickpea, its wild relatives and their interspecific hybrids. Aus J Exp Agric 46:1349–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danehloueipour N, Yan G, Clarke HJ, Siddique KHM (2007) Diallel analyses reveal the genetic control of resistance to ascochyta blight in diverse chickpea and wild Cicer species. Euphytica 154:195–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekbote RB (1942) Genetics of two mutations in Cicer. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 2:50–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan Y, Liu P, McDonald C (2003) Severity of ascochyta blight in relation to leaf type in chickpea. Crop Sci 43:2291–2294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genstat (2003) Genstat for Windows 7th Edition (Version 7.2.0.208). http://www.vsn-intl.com. Cited 16 Jul 2007

  • Gaur PM, Gaor VK (2003) Broad-few-leaflets and outwardly curved wings: two new mutants of chickpea. Plant Breed 122:192–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights EJ (1991) Evaluation of multipinnate leaf. Int Chickpea Newsl 25:16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusmenoglu I (1990) Ascochyta blight of chickpea: inheritance and relationship to seed size, morphological traits and isozyme variation. Dissertation, Washington State University

  • Lichtenzveig J, Shtienberg HB, Zhang DJ, Bonfil DJ, Abbo S (2002) Biometric analyses of the inheritance to Didimella rabiei in chickpea. Phytopath 92:417–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlbauer FJ, Kaiser WJ, Kusmenoglu I (1998a) Registration of ‘Sanford’ chickpea. Crop Sci 38:282

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlbauer FJ, Kaiser WJ, Kusmenoglu I (1998b) Registration of ‘Dwelley’ chickpea. Crop Sci 38:283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande S, Siddique KHM, Kishore GK, Bayaa B, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL, Bretag TW, Crouch JH (2005) Ascochyta blight of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review of biology pathogenicity, and disease management. Aus J Agric Res 56:317–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pundir RPS, Mengesha MH, Reddy KN (1990) Leaf types and their genetics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 45:197–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MV, Singh KB (1984) Evaluation of a world collection of chickpea germplasm accessions for resistance to ascochyta blight. Plant Dis 68:900–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu JS, Gupta SK, Singh P, Bains TS, Kaur A (2005) Leaf and pod characters as selection criteria for large-seeded kabuli chickpea. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl 12:17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique KHM, Regan KL (2005) Registration of kabuli chickpea ‘Kimberley Large’. Crop Sci 45:1659–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique KHM, Regan KL, Malhotra RS (2007) Registration of ‘Almaz’ kabuli chickpea. Crop Sci 46:437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B (1962) Inheritance studies of a new spontaneously originated simple leaf mutant in Cicer arietinum L. Sci Cult 28:138–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh DP, Singh BB (1992) Inheritance of morphological characters in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian J Genet Plant Breed 52:55–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh KB, Reddy MV (1983) Inheritance of resistance to ascochyta blight in chickpea. Crop Sci 23:9–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan S, Gaur PM, Rao BV (2006) Relationships of pinnate (fern) and simple (unifoliate) leaf traits with seed yield and seed size in kabuli chickpea. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl 13:7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewari SK, Pandey MP (1986) Genetics of resistance to ascochyta blight in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 35:211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vir S, Grewal JS, Gupta VP (1975) Inheritance of resistance to ascochyta blight in chickpea. Euphytica 24:209–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr Alan Harris and Mr Stuart Morgan for their expertise and assistance in field screening for disease. We thank Miss Leila Eshraghi for technical support. This research was supported by the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran and the Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture (CLIMA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather J. Clarke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danehloueipour, N., Clarke, H.J., Yan, G. et al. Leaf type is not associated with ascochyta blight disease in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 162, 281–289 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9617-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9617-x

Keywords

Navigation