Abstract
The idea of moral progress is a necessary presupposition of action for beings like us. We must believe that moral progress is possible and that it might have been realized in human experience, if we are to be confident that continued human action can have any morally constructive point. I discuss the implications of this truth for moral psychology. I also show that once we understand the complex nature and the complicated social sources of moral progress, we will appreciate why we cannot construct a plausible comprehensive action-guiding theory of moral progress. Yet while the nature and sources of moral progress consistently thwart many theoretical hopes, the idea of moral progress is a plausible, critically important and morally constructive principle of historical interpretation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Lasch also contends insists that “the dream of universal brotherhood, because it rests on the sentimental fiction that men and women are all the same, cannot survive the discovery that they differ” (Lasch 1991: 36).
This definition draws on the Oxford English Dictionary definition of hope as “desire combined with expectation.”
Much of Gabriel Marcel’s contribution to existentialism concerned the importance of hope in human existence. See Marcel (1951 and 1965). I am indebted to A. W. Musschenga for this critical reminder. Important contemporary treatments of hope include Chignell (2013); Lear (2006); Martin ( 2014 );and van Hooft (2014).
Augustine, The Enchiridion on Faith, Hope and Love, secs. 7,8, 114–116; Aquinas Summa Theologica I-II.62.1). These accounts build primarily on 1 Corinthians 13: 13 and 15:19.
The question appears near the end of the Critique of Pure Reason (A 804–5/B833, and again in the Logic (9:25).
For the statement of the “Partners in Health” mission, see http://www.pih.org/pages/our-mission.
Farmer makes this observation in an online interview at http://www.pih.org/media/video-dr.-paul-farmer-on-hope.
This observation is attributed to Laura Cooper a labor law professor, in reference to Jenson v. Eveleth, the first successful class action sexual harassment lawsuit in America . See Bingham (2003:388).
The speech is archived at http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1941/410824a.html.
Though I cannot argue this point here, I believe that moral pioneers are often—perhaps always—people to whom we can (and should) look as moral exemplars and moral experts. This is one important source of my disagreement with the view of moral progress defended by Philip Kitcher in The Ethical Project. See, for instance, Kitcher (2011: 285–287). For a fuller account of the nature of their expertise, see Moody-Adams (1999).
Rwanda’s progress is discussed in http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/05/science/rwandas-health-care-success-story.html?_r=0.
The plausibility of Putnam’s stance rejecting the idea that moral ‘problems’ have solutions is the principal reason that I fundamentally reject Amanda Roth’s idea that Ethical Progress can be understood as “problem-resolving.” Roth’s view is developed in Roth (2012).
I cannot, here, provide the argument for this claim. That argument is central to some of my (as yet) unpublished work on “Civic Art of Remembrance and the and the Democratic Imagination,” that is part of a larger contribution to democratic theory.
See Douglass (1994)
The project produced between 164,000 and 175,000 photographic negatives, only some of which were developed and displayed for public viewing.
See Franklin D. Roosevelt (1937), “One Third of a Nation” FDR’s 2nd inaugural address, http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5105/.
References
Bingham C, Gansler LL (2003) Class action: the landmark case that changed sexual harassment law. Anchor Press, New York
Calhoun C (1989) Responsibility and reproach. Ethics 99:389–406
Chignell A (2013) Rational hope, moral order and the revolution of the will. In: Watkins E (ed) The Divine order, the human order, and the order of nature. Oxford UP, Oxford
Davis DBD (1975) The problem of slavery in the age of revolution, 1770–1823. Oxford UP, Oxford
Dewey J (1980) Art as experience. Penguin Press, New York
Douglass F (1994) Autobiographies : Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave; My Bondage and My Freedom; Life and Times of Frederick Douglass. Gates, HL (ed) Library of America: New York
Duff A (1987) Aristotelian courage. Ratio 39:2–15
Farmer P (2013) To repair the world. U California Press, Berkeley
Fricker M (2007) Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford UP, Oxford
Gravlee RS (2000) Aristotle on Hope. J Hist Phil 38:461–1677
Jowett G and O’Donnell (2014) Propaganda and persuasion, 6th edition., Sage Publications: London Kant I Critique of Pure Reason
Kitcher P (2011) The Ethical Project. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Lasch C (1991) The true and only heaven: progress and its critics. WW Norton Press, New York
Lear J (2006) Radical hope. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Lederach JP (2005) The moral imagination: the art and soul of building peace. Oxford UP, New York
Lemkin R (1944) Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation – Analysis of Government – Proposals for Redress. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Division of International Law, Washington, DC
MacKinnon C (1987) Feminism unmodified. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Marcel G (1951) The Mystery of Being. Charles Regnery, Chicago
Marcel G (1965) Homo Viator: Introduction to a Metaphysic of Hope, tr. Emma Craufurd Harper & Row, Chicago
Martin A (2014) How we hope: a moral psychology. Princeton UP, Princeton
Merton R (1973) The sociology of science. U Chicago Press, Chicago
Moody-Adams M (1994) Theory, Practice, and the contingency of Rorty's irony. J Soc Phil 25:209–227
Moody-Adams M (1997) Fieldwork in familiar places: morality, culture and philosophy. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Moody-Adams M (1999) The idea of moral progress. Metaphilosophy 30:168–185
Moody-Adams M (2003) The legacy of Plessy v. Ferguson.. Lott T, Pittman J (eds) Blackwell’s Companion to American to African American Philosophy Blackwell Press, Oxford
Morris A (2000) Reflections on social movement theory: criticisms and proposals. Contemp Sociol 29:445–454
Musher SA (2015) Democratic art: the new deal’s influence on American culture. U Chicago Press, Chicago
Nussbaum M (2007) On moral progress: a response to Richard Rorty U Chi L. Rev 74:939–960
Platts M (1988) Moral reality. In: Sayre-McCord G (ed) Essays on moral realism. Cornell UO, Ithaca
Posner R (1998) Moral change and social relativism. Harvard L Rev 111:1638–1709
Putnam H (1990) Realism with a human face. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Quine WVO (1980) Reply to Morton White. In: Hahn LE and Schilpp PA (eds) The Philosophy of W.V.O. Quine Open Court Publishing, La Salle
Rawls J (2001) Justice as fairness: A restatement. Belknap Press, Cambridge
Rorty R (1991) Feminism and pragmatism. Mich Quart Rev 30:231–266
Rorty R (2005) Is philosophy relevant to applied ethics? Bus Ethics Q 16:369–380
Roth A (2012) Ethical Progress as Problem-Resolving. J. Political Philos 20:384–406
Rucyahana J (2007) The Bishop of Rwanda: finding forgiveness amidst a pile of bones. Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville
Scheffler S (2003) The appeal of political liberalism in Boundaries and allegiances. Oxford UP, Oxford
Sen A (1980) Description as Choice. Oxf Econ Pap 32:353–369
Singer P (1979) Practical ethics. Cambridge UP, Cambridge
Singer P (1981) The expanding circle: ethics, evolution, and moral progress. Princeton UP, Princeton
Slote M (1982) Is virtue possible? Analysis 42:70–76
Vrdoljak A (2010) Human rights and genocide: the work of Lauterpacht and Lemkin in modern international law. Eur J Int Law 20:1163–1194
van Hooft S (2014) Hope. Routledge, New York
Walzer M (1987) Interpretation and social criticism. Harvard UP, Cambridge
Wilson WJ (1987) The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass, and public policy. U Chicago Press, Chicago
Tutu D (1999) No future without forgiveness. Doubleday Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moody-Adams, M.M. Moral Progress and Human Agency. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 20, 153–168 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9748-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9748-z