Abstract
The paper investigates the ethics of information transparency (henceforth transparency). It argues that transparency is not an ethical principle in itself but a pro-ethical condition for enabling or impairing other ethical practices or principles. A new definition of transparency is offered in order to take into account the dynamics of information production and the differences between data and information. It is then argued that the proposed definition provides a better understanding of what sort of information should be disclosed and what sort of information should be used in order to implement and make effective the ethical practices and principles to which an organisation is committed. The concepts of “heterogeneous organisation” and “autonomous computational artefact” are further defined in order to clarify the ethical implications of the technology used in implementing information transparency. It is argued that explicit ethical designs, which describe how ethical principles are embedded into the practice of software design, would represent valuable information that could be disclosed by organisations in order to support their ethical standing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Ahrens, M. (2006). Computer and computer peripheral fires with a discussion of batteries. Quincy, MA: NFPA.
Clarke, T. (2007). International corporate governance: A comparative approach. London: Routledge.
Coffee, J. C. (2006). Gatekeepers: The professions and corporate governance. Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DiPiazza, S. A., & Eccles, R. G. (2002). Building public trust: The future of corporate reporting. New York: Wiley.
Floridi, L. (2004). Open problems in the philosophy of information. Metaphilosophy, 35, 554–582.
Floridi, L. (2006). The ontological interpretation of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 185–200.
Floridi, L. (2007). In defence of the veridical nature of semantic information. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 3(1), 31–41.
Floridi, L. (2008). Data. In W. A. Darity (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Detroit: Macmillan.
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2002). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods (UW CSE Technical Report 02-12-01). Department of Computer Science and Engineering: Seattle, University of Washington.
Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., & Science Museum (Great Britain) (Eds.). (2001). Biotechnology, 1996–2000: The years of controversy. London: Science Museum.
Harvey, B. (1995). Ethical banking: The case of the co-operative bank. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(12), 1005–1013.
Lamming, R., Caldwell, N., & Harrison, D. (2004). Developing the concept of transparency for use in supply relationships. British Journal of Management, 15, 291–302.
Löfstedt, R. E., & Renn, O. (1997). The Brent Spar controversy: An example of risk communication gone wrong. Risk Analysis, 17(2), 131–136.
Magretta, J. (1997). Growth through global sustainability. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 78–88.
Mallin, C. (2002). The relationship between corporate governance, transparency and financial disclosure. Corporate governance, 10(4), 253.
Moll, R. (2003). Ford motor company and the firestone tyre recall. Journal of Public Affairs, 3(3), 200–211.
Moor, J. H. (1997). Towards a theory of privacy in the information age. SIGCAS Computer and Society, 27(3), 27–32.
Sanders, J., & Turilli, M. (2007). Dynamics of control. In TASE 2007 (pp. 440–449).
Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2007). The metaphilosophy of information. Minds and Machines, 17(3), 331–344.
Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2007). Information gain from inference. In LogKCA-07, international workshop on logic and philosophy of knowledge, rationality, and action (pp. 351–368). Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain: The University of Basque Country Press.
Sparkes, R. (2001). Ethical investment: Whose ethics, which investment? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(3), 194–205.
Turilli, M. (2007). Ethical protocols design. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 253–262.
Turilli, M. (2008). Ethics and the practice of software design. In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & K. Waelbers (Eds.), Current issues in computing and philosophy. Amsterdam: IOS.
Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2006). Firm information transparency: Ethical questions in the information age. In Social informatics: An information society for all? In remembrance of Rob Kling (pp. 145–156). New York: Springer.
Warwick, S. (2001). Is copyright ethical? An examination of the theories, laws and practices regarding the private the private ownership of intellectual work in the United States. In R. A. Spinello & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (pp.␣263–279). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
Winkler, B. (2000). Which kind of transparency? On the need for clarity in monetary policy-making. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.
Acknowledgements
One of us, Turilli, wishes to thank the Director of the Centre for Ethics and Economics and Business for his kind invitation to present a previous version of this paper at the conference ICT, transparency and social responsibility, 7–9 October, 2007 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal. Turilli also wishes to thank all the conference participants, particularly Deborah Johnson, Jeroen van den Hoven and Antonino Vaccaro for their useful feedback. Special thanks are extended to the Oxford e-Science Research Centre for their financial and scientific support. We both express our gratitude to members of the IEG, University of Oxford, and of the GPI, University of Hertfordshire, for their critique of earlier versions of this work. We remain the only persons responsible for any of its shortcomings.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turilli, M., Floridi, L. The ethics of information transparency. Ethics Inf Technol 11, 105–112 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9187-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9187-9