Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Legal Protection From Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation: Findings From Litigation

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since 1964 with the enactment of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the courts have held that although Title VII prohibits discrimination because of sex, sex has been construed to mean gender, but gender and sexual orientation are different. Traditionally sexual discrimination has been interpreted to protect women in male/female encounters. Thus protection for homosexuals based on sexual orientation has not been covered. However, there are some interesting aspects to the concept of discrimination due to sexual orientation, including defining same-sex harassment as being harassment, equal opportunity harassment, and sexual stereotypes. In addition, how homosexuals may be protected under state laws, unions, company policy, and the constitution is discussed as well as protection for public sector employees. An analysis of 98 litigated cases alleging discrimination based on same sex or sexual orientation harassment led to the development of a logit model predicting future case outcomes based on case characteristics. These are type of harassment, physical contact, type of employees, and whether there was equal opportunity harassment. Implications from the study are that the issues of protection from discrimination are complex and one cannot necessarily assume that this type of discrimination is not protected. Recommendations for more effective managerial actions are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agency mishandled same-sex discrimination claim. (2000, April 13). Federal EEO Advisor, 3, 3.

  • Agresti, A. (1989). Tutorial on modeling ordered categorical response data. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 290–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, M. V. L (1995). The wage effects of sexual orientation discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 726–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bible, J. D. (2001). Employment law gender stereotyping courts open the door to Title VII claims by homosexuals. Journal of Employment Discrimination. 3, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Insurance. (1999, August 30). EEOC settles same-sex harassment suit. 33(35), 64.

  • CCH Internet Research NetWork, HRM-EEO P 185, HOMOSEXUALS.

  • lark, West, Keller, Butler, & Ellis (2000). Gender stereotyping: New claim or flash in the pan? Texas Employment Law Letter, 11, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., & Eliason, S. R. (1988). Some common problems in log-linear analysis. In Long, J. S. (Ed.), Common Problems/Proper Solutions: Avoiding Error in Quantitative Research, 226–257. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, R. (2000). Improving state policies prohibiting public employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(2), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • DelPo, M. (2000). The thin line between love and hate: Same sex hostile environment sexual harassment. Labor Law Journal, 51(1), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMaris, A. (1992). Logit Modeling: Practical Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskridge, W. N., Jr. (1997). A jurisprudence of “coming out”: Religion, homosexuality, and collisions of liberty and equality in American public law. Yale Law Journal, 106(8), 2411–2474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, N. (1997, June 30). Home depot: Beyond do-it-yourselfers. Business Week, 3533, 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman v. Indiana, 00-230, Supreme Court of the United States, 531 U.S. 880; 121 S. Ct. 191; 148 L. Ed. 2d 132; 2000 U.S. Lexis 5960; 69 U.S.L.W. 3230; 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1600 (October 2, 2000,Decided).

  • Jasiunas, J. B. (2000). Is ENDA the answer? Can a separate but equal federal statute adequately protect gays and lesbians from employment discrimination? Ohio State Law Journal, 61, 1529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, D. E., & Kustis, G. A. (2000). Same-sex sexual harassment: A legal assessment with implications for organizational policy. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 12(3), 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, D. A. (1994). Employment discrimination against lesbians and gays: The incomplete legal responses of the United States and the European Union. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 4(335), 338–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levit, N. (2000). A different kind of sameness: Beyond formal equality and antisubordination strategies in gay legal theory. Ohio State Law Journal, 61, 867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcosson, S. A. (1995). The ‘Special Rights’ canard in the debate over lesbian and gay civil rights. Notre Dame Journal of Legal Ethics and Public Policy, 9(137), 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matusewitch, E. (2001). Sexual orientation law in the workplace. Employment Litigation Reporter: Commentary, 14(18), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M., McGill, H., & Shapiro. (2000, November). Maine Employment Law Letter. Retrieved January 29, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://web.lexis-nexis.xom/universe/document?ansset=GeHauKo-EXERMsSezeruuw.

  • Morris v. Henderson, Postmaster General, U.S. (2000). Postal Service, 100 FEOR 1122 (EEOC February 9, 2000).

  • Newman, M. (2000, September). Sexual harassment at work: Approaches to prevention and cure. American Review of Public Administration, 30(3), 353–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio Supreme Court Reinstates $1.65 million Distress Verdict. Sexual Harassment Litigation Reporter (2000, July). 6(5), 4.

  • Oncale vs. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. 523 U.S. 75.

  • Oregon: State Law Does, Indeed, Cover Same Sex Harassment. (2000, November). Personnel Manager’s Legal Letter, 12.

  • Roehling, M. V. (1993). ‘Extracting’ policy from judicial opinions: The dangers of policy capturing in a field setting. Personnel Psychology, 464(10), 477–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero v. Caribbean Restaurants, Civil No. 97-1491 (HL), United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, 14 F. Supp. 2d 185; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12333; 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1136, (July 31, 1998, Decided).

  • Same sex harassment claims survives employer’s motion for summary judgment. (2000, September 6). New York Law Journal, 21.

  • Settlement of same-sex harassment suit filed by former sales personnel against sales manager Burt Chevrolet of LGC Management. (2000, August 21). Automotive News, 74(5888), 4.

  • Shenvyn, D. S., Kaufman, E. A., & Klausner A. A. (2000). Same-sex sexual harassment. Cornell Hotel & Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41(6), 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton v. Runyon, Docket No 99-6180, Supreme Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 225 F. 3d 122 (2000 U.S. App).

  • Smiley-Marquez, C. (1999, Fall). Prevention vs. remediation: Anti-harassment training pays off. Diversity Factor, 8(1), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Title VII does not cover sexual orientation harassment, says Pennsylvania Federal court. (2000, April). Sexual Harassment Litigation Reporter, 6(2), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, J. M., & Bolino, M. C. (1997, Spring). Explaining U.S. courts of appeals decisions involving performance appraisal: Accuracy, fairness, and validation. Personnel Psychology, 50(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver v. Nebo School District, No. 2:97-CV-819J, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, 29 F. Supp. 2d 1279; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20483; 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P46,220 (November 25, 1998, Decided, November 25, 1998, Entered on Docket).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business and Public Administration, Governors State University, University Park, Illinois, 60466

    Marsha Katz

  2. Department of Management, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois

    Helen LaVan

Authors
  1. Marsha Katz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helen LaVan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marsha Katz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, M., LaVan, H. Legal Protection From Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation: Findings From Litigation. Employ Respons Rights J 16, 195–209 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-004-4636-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-004-4636-4

Search

Navigation