Skip to main content
Log in

Pricing financial claims contingent upon an underlying asset monitored at discrete times

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exotic option contracts typically specify a contingency upon an underlying asset price monitored at a discrete set of times. Yet, techniques used to price such options routinely assume continuous monitoring leading to often substantial price discrepancies. A brief review of relevant option-pricing methods is presented. The pricing problem is transformed into one of Wiener–Hopf type using a z-transform in time and a Fourier transform in the logarithm of asset prices. The Wiener–Hopf technique is used to obtain probabilistic identities for the related random walks killed by an absorbing boundary. An accurate and efficient approximation is obtained using Padé approximants and an approximate inverse z-transform based on the trapezoidal rule. For simplicity, European barrier options in a Gaussian Black–Scholes framework are used to exemplify the technique (for which exact analytic expressions are obtained). Extensions to different option contracts and options driven by other Lévy processes are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Black F and Scholes M (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Economy 81: 637–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harrison JM and Kreps DM (1979). Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. J Econ Theory 20: 381–408

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Harrison JM and Pliska SR (1981). Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading. Stochastic Process Appl 11: 215–260

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Delbaen F and Schachermayer W (1994). A general version of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing. Math Ann 300: 463–520

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Airoldi M (2005). A moment expansion approach to option pricing. Quant Finance 5(1): 89–104

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Borovkov K and Novikov A (2002). On a new approach to calculating expectations for option pricing. J Appl Probab 39(4): 889–895

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Broadie M, Glasserman P and Kou S (1997). A continuity correction for discrete barrier options. Math Finance 7: 325–349

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Broadie M, Glasserman P and Kou S (1999). Connecting discrete and continuous path-dependent options. Finance Stoch 3: 55–82

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Broadie M and Yamamoto Y (2005). A double-exponential fast Gauss transform algorithm for pricing discrete path-dependent options. Oper Res 53(5): 764–779

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fusai G and Recchioni MC (2007). Analysis of quadrature methods for pricing discrete barrier options. J Econom Dynam Control 31: 826–860

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hörfelt P (2003). Extension of the corrected barrier approximation by Broadie, Glasserman and Kou. Finance Stoch 7: 231–243

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Howison S and Steinberg M (2007). A matched asymptotic expansion approach to continuity corrections for discretely sampled options. Part 1: barrier options–Appl Math Finance 14(1):63–89

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kou SG (2003). On pricing of discrete barrier options. Statist Sinica 13: 955–964

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Petrella G and Kou S (2004). Numerical pricing of discrete barrier and lookback options via Laplace transforms. J Comp Finance 8(1): 1–38

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tse WM, Li LK and Ng KW (2001). Pricing discrete barrier and hindsight options with the tridiagonal probability algorithm. Manage Sci 47(3): 383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fusai G, Abrahams ID and Sgarra C (2006). An exact analytical solution for discrete barrier options. Finance Stoch 10(1): 1–26

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Abate J and Whitt W (1992). Numerical inversion of probability generating functions. Oper Res Lett 12: 245–251

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Abrahams ID (2000). The application of Padé approximants to Wiener–Hopf factorization. IMA J Appl Math 65: 257–281

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross Green.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, R., Abrahams, I.D. & Fusai, G. Pricing financial claims contingent upon an underlying asset monitored at discrete times. J Eng Math 59, 373–384 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-007-9176-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-007-9176-0

Keywords

Navigation