Abstract
To estimate the radiation hazard due to the natural terrestrial radioactivity, 598 samples of soil covering the entire Romanian territory were collected and analyzed for the distribution of natural radionuclides 40K, 228Ac, and 226Ra. The ultra-low background Slanic-Prahova underground laboratory was used to determine the gamma-ray-specific activity of these radioactive isotopes with an uncertainty between 5 and 20%. All these data permitted to establishing a set of 2D maps illustrating the distribution of specific activity of each radionuclide as well as of the resulting air dose rate, all of them illustrating an heterogeneous distribution, increased values being displaced on the western and south-western territory. Mediated over 598 points, these determinations led to a value of annual effective dose of 0.7 ± 0.15 mSv/y and an external hazard index of 0.46 ± 0.1, both attesting to a radioecologically safe environment for human activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed are included in this article.
Code availability
Not applicable for this section.
Abbreviations
- Cs :
-
Cambisol
- Cz :
-
Chernozem
- Fl :
-
Fluvisol
- Gl :
-
Gleyisol
- Ka :
-
Kastanozem
- Lp :
-
Leptosol
- Lu :
-
Luvisol
- Ph :
-
Pheozem
- Po :
-
Podzol
- Re :
-
Regosol
- So :
-
Solonetz
- Ve :
-
Vertisol
- AcI :
-
Acid to intermediate volcanic rocks
- Cl :
-
Clayey loam
- Cn :
-
Conglomerate
- Cc :
-
Consolidated-clastic-sedimentary rocks
- Cs :
-
Cover sand, eolian sand, detrital limestone, facies bound stone
- Fc :
-
Flluvial clays, silts, and loams
- Fl :
-
Flysh
- G :
-
Granite
- Hcd :
-
Holocene coastal sand with shells
- Ld :
-
Lake deposits
- Lm :
-
Limestone
- Lss :
-
Loess
- Mr :
-
Marl
- Pl :
-
Pelite, lutite or argilite
- PQ :
-
Pre-quaternary clay and silt
- Rr :
-
Residual and redeposited loams from silicate rocks
- Tc :
-
Tertiary clay
- Ud :
-
Unconsolidated deposits (alluvium, weathering)
References
Arevalo, R. (2018). Potassium. In M. V. White et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Geochemistry. Springer.
Blebea-Apostu, A. M., Margineanu, R. M., Duliu, O. G., et al. (2023). 137Cs distribution on the territory of Romania 30 years after Chernobyl accident. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195, 848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11441-0
Beretka, J., & Matthew, P. J. (1985). Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Physics, 48, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198501000-00007
Blum, W. E. H., Schad, P., & Nortcliff, S. (2018). Essentials of soil science. Borntraeger Science Publishers.
Burrough, P. A., McDonnell, R. A., & Lloyd, C. D. (2015). Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press.
Calin, N., Iancu A.-M., Anason, M.A. et al. (2011) Geochemistry of phosphogypsum from Turnu Magurele, Geophysical Research Abstracts, 13, EGU2011-3151,https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2011/EGU2011-3151.pdf
Dahlkamp, F. J. (2016). Romania. In Uranium Deposits of the World. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78554-5_12
Dalrymple, G. B. (2001). The age of the Earth in the twentieth century: a problem (mostly) solved. Special Publications, Geological Society of London, 190, 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2001.190.01.14
Els, G., & Eriksson, P. (2006). Placer formation and placer minerals. Ore Geology Reviews, 28, 373–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2005.02.001
ESCD (2023) Europa Soil Data Center, https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
Florea, N., & Duliu, O. G. (2013). Rehabilitation of the Barzava Uranium Mine Tailings. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste, 17, 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000172
Hendry, J. H., Simon, S. L., Wojcik, A., et al. (2009). Human exposure to high natural background radiation: what can it teach us about radiation risks? Journal of Radiological Protection, 29, A29–A42. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S03
Farrance, I., & Frenkel, R. (2012). Uncertainty of measurement: A review of the rules for calculating uncertainty components through functional relationships. Clinical Biochemical Review, 33, 49–75 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387884/ (accessed 21 December 2023)
Fuller, A. J., Shaw, S., Ward, M. B., et al. (2015). Caesium incorporation and retention in illite interlayers. Applied Clay Science, 108, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.02.008
IAEA. (2003). Guidelines for Radioelement Mapping Using Gamma Ray Spectrometry Data (p. 173). IAEA-TECDOC-1363; International Atomic Energy Agency https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1363_web.pdf (accessed 10.08.2023)
Iancu, A. M., Dumitras, D. G., Marincea, S., et al. (2019). The impact on the environment of the phosphogypsum stacks in Romania, Goldschmidt Conference Abstracts. Taylor & Francis.
Ion, A., Cosac, A., & Ene, V. V. (2023). Natural radioactivity in soil and radiological risk assessment in Lisava Uranium Mining Sector, Banat Mountains, Romania. Applied Sciences, 12, 12363. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312363
Iordanova, I. I., Banov, M. D., Misheva, L. G., et al. (2015). Natural radioactivity in virgin soils and soils from some areas with closed uranium mining facilities in Bulgaria. Open Chemistry, 13, 600–605. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2015-0065
WRB. (2022). World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps (4th edi. ed.). International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS) https://wrb.isric.org/files/WRB_fourth_edition_2022-12-18.pdf (accessed 10 October 2023)
Khomutinin, Y., Fesenko, S., Levchuk, S., et al. (2020). Optimising sampling strategies for emergency response: Soil sampling. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 222, 106344.
Margineanu, R. M., Simion, C. A., Bercea, S., et al. (2008). The Slanic-Prahova (ROMANIA) underground low-background radiation laboratory. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 66, 1501–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.04.002
Margineanu, R.M., Blebea-Apostu, A-M., Celarel, A. et al. (2014) Radiometric, SEM and XRD investigation of the Chituc black sands, southern Danube Delta, Romania, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 138, 72-79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.08.006
Margineanu, R. M., Ranca, A., Bolos, P., et al. (2018). Natural and artificial radionuclides distribution in soil in Murfatlar area, Dobrogea region. Romanian Journal of Physics, 63, 809 https://rjp.nipne.ro/2018_63_7-8/RomJPhys.63.809.pdf (accessed 10th August 2023)
Mitrovic, B., Todorovici, D., Ajtici, J., et al. (2020). A review: Natural and artificial radionuclides and radiation hazard parameters in the soil of mountain regions in Serbia. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 65, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS2001001M
Nicolov, J., Forkapic, S., Hansman, J., et al. (2014). Natural radioactivity around former uranium mine, Gabrovnica in Eastern Serbia. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 302, 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3203-1
NEA. (2002). The release, dispersion, deposition and behaviour of radionuclides. In H. Métivie (Ed.), Chernobyl. Assessment of Radiologicaland Health Impacts. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD Publications https://www.oecd-nea.org/upload/docs/application/pdf/2022-01/3508-chernobyl_2022-01-05_11-11-9_843.pdf (accessed 10.0802023)
Panagos, P., Van Liedekerke, M., Jones, A., et al. (2012). European soil data centre: Response to European policy support and public data requirements. Land Use Policy, 29, 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.003
Panagos, P., Van Liedekerke, M., Borrelli, P., et al. (2022). European soil data centre 2.0: Soil data knowledge in support of the EU policies. European Journal of Soil Science, 73, e13315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13315
Papic, M., Vuković, M., Bikit, I., et al. (2014). Multi-criteria analysis of soil radioactivity in Čačak basin, Serbia. Romanian Journal of Physics, 59, 846–861.
Papp, Z. (2010). Natural radioactivity in the soils of some eastern counties of Hungary. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 141, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq150
Petrescu, L., Bilal, E., & Iatan, L. E. (2011). The impact of a uranium mining site on the stream sediments (Crucea mine, Romania). Scientific Annals of the School of Geology, 100, 121–126 https://hal.science/hal-00557691
Rudnick, R. L., & Gao, S. (2004). Composition of the continental crust. In H. D. Holland & K. K. Turekian (Eds.), Treatise on Geochemistry (p. 63). Elsevier-Pergamon.
Sandu, I., Pescaru, V. I., & Poiana, I. (2008). Romania’s Climate. Romanian Academy Press (In Romanian).
Shepard, D. (1968). A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In Proceedings of the 1968 ACM National Conference (pp. 517–524). https://doi.org/10.1145/800186.810616
Stojanovska, Z., Boev, B., Bosew, P., et al. (2019). Analysis of specific radionuclide activity variations in soil within geotectonic units of Republic of North Macedonia. Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection, 34, 85–92 https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1451-3994/2019/1451-39941800017S.pdf (accessed 10.08.2023)
Tye, A. M., Milodowski, A. E., & Smedley, P. L. (2017). Distribution of natural radioactivity in the environment. In British Geological Survey Open Report. OR/17/01 British Geological Survey https://pubs.bgs.ac.uk/publications.html?pubID=OR17001 (accessed15.09.2023)
Tugulan, L. C., & Duliu, O. G. (2014). Annual dose rate determination by high resolution gamma spectrometry for TL dating of loess deposits in South-eastern Dobrudjea, Romania. Romanian Reports in Physics, 66, 862–876 https://rrp.nipne.ro/2014_66_3/A25.pdf (accessed 01.08.2023)
UNSCEAR. (1993). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). In Exposure from natural sources of radiation https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210582452/read (accessed 01.08.2023)
UNSCEAR. (2000). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). In Effects and risks of ionizing radiations https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210582490/read (accessed 01.08.2023)
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank five anonymous reviewers for detailed analysis of the manuscript and for their useful remarks and advices.
Funding
This work was supported by the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research Projects: PN 16–42-02–03 and PN 19–06-02–03, PN 19–45-01–02 and PN 23-21-02-02.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A-MB-A and RMM have planned this project and collected the samples; A-MB-A, RMM, and M-CG have performed the experimental measurements; DP generated all maps; A-MB-A, RMM, D-D, and OGD have analyzed data and prepared the manuscript; A-MB-A, RMM, DD, DP, OGD, and M-CG have checked the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable for this section.
Consent to participate
Field study was carried out on agreement of local authorities. The study did not involve endangered or protected zone.
Consent for publication
All authors have consented to publish this study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(XLS 164 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Blebea-Apostu, AM., Margineanu, R.M., Persa, D. et al. The distribution of natural radionuclides 40K, 228Ac, and 226Ra on Romanian Territory: a radiometric study. Environ Monit Assess 196, 186 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12374-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12374-y