Skip to main content
Log in

Residue behaviour and health risk assessment of chlorpyrifos and mancozeb in apple fruits and soil

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mancozeb residue estimation was done using second derivative ultraviolet spectroscopy by Shimadzu ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer, and chlorpyrifos was estimated by QuEChERS technique using GC-FPD. The persistence for chlorpyrifos was carried out at two locations, and for mancozeb, persistence studies were carried out at four locations. Initial deposits of mancozeb on apple fruits ranged from 1.33 to 1.63 mg/kg at the recommended dose and from 2.55 to 3.26 mg/kg at double the recommended dose at all four locations. Chlorpyrifos residues in apple fruits had an initial deposit of 0.94–0.99 mg/kg at recommended dose and 1.75–1.92 mg/kg at double the recommended dose. Mancozeb residues in apple fruit were below the detection limit (BDL) after 20 days at recommended dose and after 25 days at double the recommended dose at two locations, while mancozeb residue at the other two locations and the residues of chlorpyrifos at all locations reached BDL after 15 and 20 days at recommended and double the recommended doses, respectively. Half-life of mancozeb varied from 3.07 to 4.02 days at recommended dose and from 3.30 to 4.32 days at double the recommended dose, whereas chlorpyrifos residues dissipated to half their initial concentration on 2.33–2.35 days at recommended dose and 2.89–2.90 days at double the recommended dose. The soil samples showed no presence of residues of chlorpyrifos and mancozeb at harvest. The risk assessment revealed that hazard quotient for the intake of mancozeb was in the range of 0.06–0.13% and 0.20–0.44% for rural and urban population, while for the intake of chlorpyrifos, hazard quotient was in the range of 0.10–0.12% for rural population and 0.33–0.38% for urban population, and theoretical maximum dietary intake (9.67 × 10−5 mg/person and 3.18 × 10−4 mg/person for rural population and urban population in case of mancozeb and 3.22 × 10−5 mg/person and 1.06 × 10−4 mg/person for rural population and urban population in case of chlorpyrifos) was also found to be less than maximum permissible intake (1.38 mg/kg for mancozeb and 0.60 mg/kg for chlorpyrifos). The results of risk assessment thereby indicated that apple consumption does not pose a risk to human health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Anonymous. (2018). Retrieved July 20, 2023, from http://www.Chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/howtosolveit/Kinetics/IntegratedRateLaws.html.2016

  • Aruna, M., Sriram, Y. H., Raju, R. M., & Reddy, K. N. (2017). Dissipation kinetics of chlorpyrifos in citrus fruit, juice and soil. International Journal of Chemical and Physical Sciences, 6, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldas, E. D., Miranda, M. C. C., Conceição, M. H., & de Souza, L. K. C. R. (2017). Dithiocarbamates residues in Brazilian food and the potential risk for consumers. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42, 1877–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CODEX. (2022). Pesticide index. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization in collaboration with World Health Organization. Retrieved July 21, 2023, from https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/dbs/pestres/pesticides/en/

  • Devi, P. A., Paramasivam, M., & Prakasam, V. (2015). Degradation pattern and risk assessment of carbendazim and mancozeb in mango fruits. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 4142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4142-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, J. K., & Stan, H. J. (1998). Second derivative UV spectrophotometric determination of dithiocarbamate residues as methyl xanthate in apple and lamb’s lettuce. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 35, 482–485.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, J. K., Patyal, S. K., & Sharma, A. (2018). Validation of QuEChERS analytical technique for organochlorines and synthetic pyrethroids in fruits and vegetables using GC-ECD. Environmental and Monitoring Assessment, 190, 231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6584-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Hawari, K., Mokh, S., Al Iskandarani, M., Halloum, W., & Jaber, F. (2018). Pesticide residues in Lebanese apples and health risk assessment. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B, 12, 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, C., Lozano, A., Aguera, A., Giron, A. J., & Fernandez-Alba, A. R. (2011). Overcoming matrix effects using the dilution approach in multiresidue methods for fruits and vegetables. Journal of Chromatography A, 1218, 7634–7639.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flaskos, J. (2012). The developmental neurotoxicity of organophosphorous insecticides: A direct role for the oxon metabolites. Toxicology Letters, 209, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.11.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FSSAI. (2011). Food safety and standards (contaminants, toxins and residues) regulations. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. Retrieved July 20, 2023, from https://www.fssai.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/Compendium_Contaminants_Regulations_20_08_2020.pdf

  • Fu, Y., Zheng, Z., Wei, P., Wang, M., Zhu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2016). Distribution of thifluzamide, fenoxamil and tebuconazole in rice paddy and dietary risk assessment. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 98, 118–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GEMS/Food. (2017). Guidelines for predicting dietary intake of pesticide residues (revised). Global Environment Monitoring System- Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme in collaboration with Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues.

  • Hanumantharaju, T. H., Awasthi, M. D., & Siddaramappa, R. (2022). Persistence of fungicides in tomato following application of metalaxyl-mancozeb combine formulation. Pesticide Research Journal, 14, 268–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCS. (2017). Environment Health Criteria 240: Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. International Programme on Chemical Safety of FAO and WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katna, S., Patyal, S. K., Dubey, J. K., Chauhan, T. B., Chauhan, A., Devi, N., & Sharma, A. (2017). Dissipation and risk assessment of combi product of mancozeb and carbendazim on apple at different locations in North India. Pesticide Research Journal, 29, 48–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. V., Subashchandran, K. P., George, T., Kumar, P., & Suryamol, S. (2017). Dissipation kinetics and risk assessment of novaluron in fresh and dry chilli pepper under humid climatic conditions. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 5, 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozowicka, B., Kaczynski, P., Paritova, A. E., Kuzembekova, G. B., Abzhalieva, A. B., Sarsembayeva, N. B., & Alihan, K. (2014). Pesticide residues in grain from Kazakhstan and potential health risks associated with exposure to detected pesticides. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 64, 238–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhtar, M., Sherwani, A., Wani, A. A., Ahmed, S. B., Sofi, J. A., & Bano, P. (2015). Degradation of chlorpyrifos residues in apple under temperate conditions of Kashmir valley. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4703-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NHB. (2018). Indian production of apple. National Horticulture Board. Retrieved August 4, 2023, from http://apeda.in/agriexchange/India%20Production/India_Productions.aspx?cat=fruit&hscode=1040

  • NIN. (2011). Dietary Guidelines for Indians: A manual (p. 127). National Institute for Nutrition, Hyderabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSSO. (2014). Household Consumption of Various Goods and Services in India 20ll-12; NSS 68th Round. National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. Retrieved from http://164.100.161.63/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Report_no558_rou68_30june14.pdf

  • Oerke, E. C. (2006). Centenary review: Crop losses to pests. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 144, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S. (2020). Fungal scab disease returns to Himachal after 4 decades to hit apple crop and prices. The Print. Retrieved August 4, 2023, from https://theprint.in/india/fungal-scab-disease-returns-to-himachal-after-4-decades-to-hit-apple-crop-and-prices/500712/

  • Roede, J. R., & Miller, G. W. (2014). Mancozeb. In: Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 3rd edn. Academic Press, pp 144–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386454-3.00157-3

  • SANTE. (2021). Analytical Quality Control and method validation procedures for pesticide residue analysis in food and feed; Document No SANTE 11312/2021. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, Europe. Retrieved August 4, 2023, from https://www.accredia.it/app/uploads/2021/02/SANTE_11312_2021.pdf

  • Shahbandeh, M. (2022). Major apple producing countries worldwide 2021/2022. Statista Research Department. Retrieved August 6, 2023, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/279555/global-top-apple-producing-countries/

  • Sharma, K. K. (2013). Pesticide residues analysis manual (p. 251). IARI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwani, A., Mukhtar, M., & Wani, A. A. (2016). Insect pests of apple and their management. Insect pest management in fruit crops (pp. 295–306). Biotech Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (2020). Orchards of misery: scab infestation hits apple crop in J&K. Gaon connection. Retrieved August, 5, 2023, from https://en.gaonconnection.com/orchards-of-misery-scab-infestation-hits-apple-crop-in-jk/

  • Srivastava, A. K., Rai, S., Srivastava, M. K., Lohani, M., Mudiam, M. K. R., & Srivastava, L. P. (2014). Determination of 17 organophosphorous pesticide residues in mango by modified QuEChERS extraction method using GC-NPD/ GC-MS and hazard index estimation in Lucknow. India. Plos ONE, 9, 296493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., Ma, L., Huang, J., Li, Y., Liu, Z., Meng, D., Wen, G., Dong, M., Wang, W., & Zhao, L. (2021). Residue behavior and dietary risk assessment of six pesticides in pakchoi using QuEChERS method coupled with UPLC-MS/MS. Ecotoxicological and Environmental Safety, 213, 112022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, V. S. (2008). Apple diseases chemical control in India. Acta Horticulturae, 769, 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiryaki, O. (2016). Validation of QuEChERS method for the determination of some pesticide residues in two apple varieties. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 51, 722–729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, C. D. S. (2006). The pesticide manual: A world compendium (14th ed.). Alton, British Crop Protection Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (1997). Guidelines for predicting dietary intake of pesticide residues (revised). Global Environment Monitoring System- Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme in collaboration with Codex Committee on Pesticide Residue, World Health Organization.

  • Xu, G., Nie, J., Li, H., Yan, Z., & Cheng, Y. (2017). Determination of mancozeb residue in fruit by derivatization and a modified QuEChERS method using ultraperformance liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 409, 5057–5063.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, W. M. (1961). Mathematical treatment of the rate of loss of pesticide residues. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 9, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Conceptualization of the study design and design of the study’s framework along with deriving interpretations of research findings and discussing their implications were performed by Dr. Ajay Sharma, Dr. Jatiender Kumar Dubey and Dr. Sapna Katna. Laboratory analysis was done by Dr. Nisha Devi and Dr. Gaganpreet Singh Brar. Dr. Arvind Kumar and Dr. Shubhra Singh overseed the field work including collection of samples. Dr. Hema Prashad wrote the conclusion section, summarizing the key findings and their implications for agricultural practices. The draft of the manuscript was written by Sakshi Sharma and Pankaj Sharma Istatu. All authors participated in reviewing and proofreading the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sakshi Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Ethical responsibilities of authors

All authors have read, have understood and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors” as found in the Instructions for Authors.

Ethical approval

Not applicable. This study does not involve human participants or animals so there is no need for an ethical approval.

Consent to participate

All listed authors have participated on the research conducted and/or manuscript preparation.

Consent for publication

All listed authors have approved the manuscript before submission including their names and order of authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, A., Katna, S., Dubey, J.K. et al. Residue behaviour and health risk assessment of chlorpyrifos and mancozeb in apple fruits and soil. Environ Monit Assess 196, 58 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12203-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12203-8

Keywords

Navigation