Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing distance-based methods of measuring plant density in an arid sparse scrubland: testing field and simulated sampling

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant density is an important indicator of rangeland monitoring and management. In this paper, we aimed at comparing distance-based methods of density measurement in field and in a simulated approach for two species of Astragalus verus Olivier and Astragalus albispinus Sirj. & Bornm with random and regular distribution pattern respectively. Then, we simulated a sampling scheme based on field measured statistics of the two species using Stochastic Geometry program and repeated the measurements using the same density methods. Moreover, the total individual plants of each species were counted in the sampling plots as the control method in Marjan rangelands of Iran during summer 2018. Results indicated that the best method for A. verus is nearest neighbor and point-centered quarter in field and simulated datasets in terms of both accuracy and precision respectively. For A. albispinus, the nearest neighbor and third closest individual were the best methods when compared with control in term of precision and accuracy in the field respectively and third closet individual in simulated dataset in terms of both accuracy and precision compared with control, respectively. The results reveal that there is no statistically significant difference between the nearest neighbor and point-centered quarter for A. verus and third closest individual and nearest neighbor for A. albispinus when field/simulated datasets are compared with each other and controls. Therefore, we recommend using these distance methods when this is a known species distribution pattern, basic number per unit, and dimensions of the unit as an alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiri, M. S., Joharchi, M. R., Nadaf, M., & Nasseh, Y. (2020). Ethnobotanical knowledge of Astragalusspp.: the world’s largest genus of vascular plants. Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine, 10(2), 128–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askari, Y., Kafash Saei, E., & Rezaei, D. (2013). Evaluation of different sampling methods to study of shrub density in Zagros forest. European Journal of Experimental Biology, (3), 121–128.

  • Basiri, R., Moradi, M., Kiani, B., & Maasumi Babaarabi, M. (2018). Evaluation of distance methods for estimating population density in populus euphratica Oliver natural stands (case study: Maroon riparian forest, Iran). Journal of Forest Science, 64(5), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.17221/146/2017-JFS.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham, C. D. (2013). Measurements for terrestrial vegetation (2nd ed.). UK: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Byth, K., & Ripley, B. D. (1980). On sampling spatial patterns by distance methods. Biometrics, 36, 279–284. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogbill, C. V., Thurman, A. L., Williams, J. W., Zhu, J., Mladenoff, D. J., & Goring, S. J. (2018). A retrospective on the accuracy and precision of plotless forest density estimators in ecological studies. Ecosphere, 9(4), e02187. i:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2187.

  • Cottam, G., & Curtis, J. T. (1956). The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology, 37(3), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeman, R. M., & Sugihara, R. T. (1998). Optimization of variable area transect sampling using Monte Carlo simulation. Ecology, 79(4), 1425–1434. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1425:OOVATS]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeman, R. M., Sugihara, R. T., Pank, L. F., & Dusenberry, W. E. (1994). A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation. Ecology, 75, 1769–1779. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeman, R. M., Nielson, R. M., & Sugihara, R. T. (2005). Evaluation of optimized variable area transect sampling using totally enumerated data sets. Enviroment Rics, 16(767–772), 767–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaelli, N., & Ebrahimi, A. (2003). Necessity of determining animal unit requirement based on the quality of forage. Iranian Journal of Natural resources, 55, 569–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghahremaninejad, F., Joharchi, M., Fereidounfar, S., & Hoseini, E. (2016). Astragalus orientopersicus, sp. nov. (Fabaceae), a new taxon from the Khorassan province (Iran). Adansonia, 38(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.5252/a2016n1a3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemami, M. R., Mohaghegh, S. S., Rohina, A., & Ardakani, S. S. (2013). Study of distribution pattern and density of vegetative cover in steppe and forest areas of Isfahan University of Technology. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 1(7), 701–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennenberg, K. J., & Steinke, I. (2006). On the power of plotless density estimators for statistical comparisons of plant populations. Canadian Journal Botany, 84, 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1139/b05-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijbeek, R., Koedam, N., Islam Khan, M. N., Kairo, J. G., Schoukens, J., & Dahdouh-Guebas, F. (2013). An evaluation of plotless sampling using vegetation simulations and field data from a mangrove forest. PloS One, 8(6), e67201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, B. (1954). A new method for determining the type of distribution of plant individuals. Annais of Botany, N.S., XVIII(70), 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam Khan, M. N. I., Hijbeek, R., Berger, U., & Koedam, N. (2016). An evaluation of the plant density estimator the point-center quarter method (PCQM) using Monte Carlo simulation. PLoS One, 11(6), e0157985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157985.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J. (2014). Ecological methodology. New York: University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, C. R., Cogbill, C. V., Collins, B. M., Larson, A. J., Lutz, J. A., North, M. P., Restaino, C. M., Safford, H. D., Stephens, S. L., & Battles, J. J. (2017). Evaluating a new method for reconstructing forest conditions from General Land Office survey records. Ecological Applications, 27, 1498–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, C. R., Cogbill, C. V., Collins, B. M., Larson, A. J., Lutz, J. A., North, M. P., et al. (2019). Estimating historical forest density from land-survey data: a response to Baker and Williams (2018). Ecological Applications, 00(00), e01968. https://doi.org/10.01002/eap.01968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., & Zhang, L. (2007). Comparison of point pattern analysis methods for classifying the spatial distributions of spruce-fir stands in the north-east USA. Forestry, 80(3), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpm010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maassoumi, A. A. (1998). Astragalus in the Old World check - list. Tehran: Minisity of Jahad-e-Sazandegi Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassoumi, A. A. (2000). Important notes on Astragalus subgenus Tragacantha Bunge in Iran. Journal of Botany, 8(2), 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. (2015). Quantitative analysis by the point-centered quarter method. arXiv:1010.3303v2 [q-bio. QM], 1–56.

  • Morisita, M. (1957). A new method for the estimation of density by spacing method applicable to nonrandomly distributed populations. Physiology Ecology, 7, 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffarian, V. (2017). Flora of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari (Vol. 1). Tehran: Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, V. D., Pelissier, R., & Garcia, C. (2010). Comparative efficiency and accuracy of variable area transects versus square plot for sampling tree diversity and density. Agroforestt Systems, 79, 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9255-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, J. H. (1971). On distance estimators of density in randomly distributed forests. Biometrics, 27(4), 991–1002. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pordel, F., Ebrahimi, A., & Azizi, Z. (2017). Evaluating spatio-temporal phytomass changes using vegetation index derived from Landsat 8 (Case study: Mrajan rangeland, Boroujen). [Research paper]. Journal of rangeland, 11(2), 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safaei, M., Tarkesh, M., Bashari, H., & Bassiri, M. (2018). Modeling potential habitat of Astragalus verus Olivier for conservation decisions: a comparison of three correlative models. Flora, 242(61–69), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, L. B., Alves, M., Elias, R. B., & Silva, L. (2017). Comparison of -square, point centered quarter, and -tree sampling methods in Pittosporum undulatum invaded woodlands. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2017, 13–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2818132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, N. A., Engeman, R. M., Sugihara, R. T., & Krupa, H. W. (2008). A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated fild data set. BMC Ecology, 8(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-8-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. (2011). Datei:Iran on the globe (Afro-Eurasia centered).svg. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Iran_on_the_globe_(Afro-Eurasia_centered).svg. Accessed 17 April 2020.

  • Zare Chahouki, M. A. (2012). Investigation of chemical characteristics of aerial parts and litter in four range species of Astragalus albispinus, Artemisia aucheri, Artemisia sieberi and Stipa barbata. Range Management and Agroforestry, 33(1), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the research and technology deputy of Shahrekord University and all those who assisted us in carrying out this study.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the research and technology deputy, Shahrekord University [grant number 97GRN1M1871].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elham Ghehsareh Ardestani.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamali, H., Ghehsareh Ardestani, E., Ebrahimi, A. et al. Comparing distance-based methods of measuring plant density in an arid sparse scrubland: testing field and simulated sampling. Environ Monit Assess 192, 343 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08329-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08329-8

Keywords

Navigation