Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of risk factors in forest road design and construction activities with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in Turkey

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest road design and construction are time-consuming and complicated because various risk factors can be encountered during the process. The aim of this study is to comprehensively assess the risk factors in forest road design and construction using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method in Turkey, thus contributing to the proper performance of these activities. Within the scope of the study, six main risk factors and 22 sub-risk factors were identified based on literature review. In order to determine the weights of the relevant risk factors, the opinions of three different groups [(group 1: academicians), (group 2: forest engineers (private sector employees + public sector employees)), (group 3: group 1 + group 2)] about the risk factors were obtained. Relevant risk factor weights were determined using the fuzzy AHP method. According to group 3, the most important main risk factors are technical risks and environmental risks. In addition, the most important sub-risk factors for each relevant main risk factor were incorrect road alignment, inadequate work safety in the field, insufficient capital, legal problems on the road alignment, landslide risk during road construction, and illegal logging. Differences were observed between groups 1 and 2 in the weight rankings of relevant risk factor. The results demonstrate that the fuzzy AHP method can be used effectively to assess the risks of forest road design and construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acar, H. H. (2016). Environmental sensitive road planning and transportation techniques in forest engineering. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 66(2), 710–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akay, A. E., & Sessions, J. (2005). Applying the decision support system, TRACER, to forest road design. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 20(3), 184–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgul, M., Demir, M., Ozturk, T., Topatan, H., & Budak, Y. E. (2016). Investigation of recreational vehicles maneuverability on forest roads by computer-aided driving analysis. Baltic Journal of Road & Bridge Engineering, 11(2), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, J., Benjaminsen, T. A., Hammad, A. A., & Dick, Ø. B. (2005). The road to deforestation: an assessment of forest loss and its causes in Basho Valley, Northern Pakistan. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 370–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, C., Sidle, R. C., & Tait, D. (2004). Application of decision analysis to forest road deactivation in unstable terrain. Environmental Management, 33(2), 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aminbakhsh, S., Gunduz, M., & Sonmez, R. (2013). Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. Journal of Safety Research, 46, 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayoglu, S. (1997). Forest transport foundation and vehicles. Istanbul University. Faculty of Forestry, Publish No (3969/434), [in Turkish].

  • Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. H., & Hsieh, C. H. (2000). Representation, ranking, distance, and similarity of LR type fuzzy number and application. Australian Journal of Intelligent Processing Systems, 6(4), 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N., & Landres, P. B. (1996). Threats to wilderness ecosystems: impacts and research needs. Ecological Applications, 6(1), 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H. (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21(3), 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragoi, M., Palaghianu, C., & Miron-Onciul, M. (2015). Benefit, cost and risk analysis on extending the forest roads network: a case study in Crasna Valley (Romania). Annals of Forest Research, 58(2), 333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, A. L., Loague, K., & Wemple, B. C. (2005). Road sediment production and delivery: processes and management. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 30, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eker, M., & Ada, N. (2011). The constitution of criteria and indicator set for quality analysis of a forest road. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 12(2), 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R., Weintraub, A., Sapunar, P., Nieto, E., Sessions, J. B., Sessions, J., Bustamante, F., & Musante, H. (2006). A combinatorial heuristic approach for solving real-size machinery location and road design problems in forestry planning. Operations Research, 54(6), 1017–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdas, O. (1997). Forest roads I. Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical Unversity, Faculty of Forestry, Publish No (184), [in Turkish].

  • Fannin, R. J., & Lorbach, J. (2007). Guide to forest road engineering in moutainous terrain.

  • Gorcelioglu, E. (2004). Interactions of forest road and erosion, Istanbul University, Faculty of Forestry, Publish No (4460/476), [in Turkish].

  • Gumus, S. (2009). Constitution of the forest road evaluation form for Turkish forestry. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(20).

  • Gumus, S., Acar, H. H., & Toksoy, D. (2008). Functional forest road network planning by consideration of environmental impact assessment for wood harvesting. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 142(1), 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayati, E., Abdi, E., Majnounian, B., & Makhdom, M. (2013). Application of sensitivity analysis in forest road networks planning and assessment. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 15(4), 781–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heralt, L. (2002). Using the ROADENG system to design an optimum forest road variant aimed at the minimization of negative impacts on the natural environment. Journal of Forest Science, 48(8), 361–365.

  • Huang, C.-C., Chu, P.-Y., & Chiang, Y.-H. (2008). A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega, 36(6), 1038–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacob, V. S. (2014). Risk management and evaluation and qualitative method within the projects. Ecoforum Journal, 3(1), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javanbarg, M. B., Scawthorn, C., Kiyono, J., & Shahbodaghkhan, B. (2012). Fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria decision making systems using particle swarm optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 960–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, M. C., & Parks, J. E. (1997). How wide is a road? The association of roads and mass-wasting in a forested montane environment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 22(9), 835–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo, A. E., & Gucinski, H. (2000). Function, effects, and management of forest roads. Forest Ecology and Management, 133(3), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications—two decades’ review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126–4148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meignan, D., Frayret, J.-M., Pesant, G., & Blouin, M. (2012). A heuristic approach to automated forest road location. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42(12), 2130–2141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov, L., & Tsvetinov, P. (2004). Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing, 5(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghdi, R., Bagheri, I., GhaJar, E., Taheri, K., & Hasanzad, I. (2008). Planning the most appropriate forest road network considering soil drainage and stability using GIS in Shafaroud Watershed-Guilan. In Proceeding of 7th Annual Asian Conference and Exhibition on Geospatial Information, Technology and Applications (p. 9).

  • Ozturk, T., Inan, M., & Akay, A. E. (2010). Analysis of tree damage caused by excavated materials at forest road construction in karst region. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 31(1), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsakhoo, A. (2016). Metric measurements for optimization of forest road network alternatives in GIS-based programs. Forest Science and Technology, 12(3), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: planning. Priority Setting. Resource Allocation, MacGraw-Hill, New York International Book Company, 287.

  • Sessions, J. (2007). Forest road operations in the tropics. Springer.

  • Shivakoti, G., Pradhan, U., & Helmi, H. (2016). Redefining diversity and dynamics of natural resources management in Asia, volume 1: sustainable natural resources management in dynamic Asia. Elsevier.

  • Slincu, C., Ciobanu, V., & Dumitrascu, A. E. (2012). Risks assessment in forest roads design. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, 43–48.

  • Slincu, C, & Ciobanu, V. D., Dumitrascu, A.-E., & Borz, S. A. (2013). Monitoring and control of risks for the execution process of forest roads. Romanian Journal of Economics, 37(2 (46)), 112–123.

  • Sum, R. M. (2013). Risk management decision making. In Proceedings of the international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process, ISAHP2013 Google Scholar.

  • Tian, J., & Yan, Z. F. (2013). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for risk assessment to general-assembling of satellite. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 11(4), 568–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk, Y., & Gumus, S. (2017). Evaluation of the tender results of forest road constructions (a case study: Bolu Forest Regional Directorate). Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 67(2), 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1–3), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, D., Shaw, E., Rotberg, F., Morelli, G., & Auzel, P. (2000). Roads, development, and conservation in the Congo Basin. Conservation Biology, 14(6), 1614–1622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, M., Moore, G. D., & VanDine, D. F. (2004). Landslide risk case studies in forest development planning and operations. Citeseer.

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., He, P., Xiao, J., & Xu, F. (2018). Risk assessment model of expansive soil slope stability based on Fuzzy-AHP method and its engineering application. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 9(1), 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the expert academicians at the Department of Forest Engineering as well as the employees (forest engineers) at the Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Forestry and in the private sector for contributing to this study by responding to the questionnaire prepared to assess the relevant risk factors. Also, authors thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which helped us to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Orhan Akay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akay, A.O., Demir, M. & Akgul, M. Assessment of risk factors in forest road design and construction activities with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 190, 561 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6948-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6948-0

Keywords

Navigation