Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Farmers’ attitude toward treated sludge use in the villages of West Bank, Palestine

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An application of treated sewage sludge on agricultural land has been widely accepted, as this method is simple and economical for disposal of wastewater residues. When applied properly on an agricultural land, sludge can replenish organic matter and nutrients in soil. Although sewage sludge has been used in agriculture in many parts of the world, its acceptability varies with different cultures and beliefs among farmers. Farmers’ concerns on sludge use are primarily due to its anthropogenic origin, pollutants that it carries, a general perception of sewage being dirty, and its offensive odor. This paper aims to investigate farmers’ perceptions on land application of treated sewage sludge on their farm. This study targeted two farming communities, namely, Anza and Beit Dajan villages, located in Jenin and Nablus districts in the West Bank, Palestine. In this study, a sample of 106 farmers were randomly selected and surveyed through a mixture of structured and open-ended questions. Results indicated that, overall, farmers have positive perceptions on land application of sludge. A majority of the farmers are in favor of the concept of sludge use when a planned wastewater treatment plant is constructed and it becomes operational. Results also indicate that a majority of the farmers are in favor of using sludge for fertilizing fruit trees, rather than growing vegetables and other plants in a greenhouse, and that many of them have knowledge of sludge properties and advantages and disadvantages of sludge use in agriculture. Despite the positive perceptions by the majority of farmers, a small fraction of the farmers are in disfavor of the use of sludge for the following reasons: psychological and social concerns, potential health risks, and their religious beliefs. Results further suggest that the land application of treated sewage sludge can be accepted by more farmers if the consumers are willing to buy agricultural products fertilized by sludge, sludge meets the public health requirements, and sludge is available at low costs. To improve farmers’ perceptions on the land application of sludge, several measures are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeotia, A., Cofiea, O., Nkansah-Boadu, F., & Awuah, E. (2010). Farmers’ perception and economic benefits of excreta use in southern Ghana. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55, 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Kharouf, S., Al-Khatib, I. A., & Shaheen, H. Q. (2008). Appraisal of social and cultural factors affecting wastewater reuse in the West Bank. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 33(1), 3–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Applied Research Institute–Jerusalem (2015). Status of the environment in the state of Palestine. (Edited by Jad Isaac, and Khaldoun Rishmawi Report), December 2015, Bethlehem, Palestine.

  • Arafat, W. (2013). The role of public awareness towards sustainable use of treated wastewater in agricultural irrigation. M.Sc. Thesis, Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine.

  • Bittencourt, S., Serrat, M., Aisse, M., & Gomes, D. (2014). Sewage sludge usage in agriculture: a case study of its destination in the Curitiba Metropolitan Region, Paraná, Brazil. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 225, 2074–2081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Israel to Stop Dumping Sewage Sludge into Mediterranean Sea (2016). (http://www.haaretz.com/israelnews/1.742131, accessed on June 3, 2017).

  • Dahlstrom, N. (2005). Treatment and disposal methods for wastewater sludge in the area of Beijing, China. Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lund University, Sweden.

  • Davis, R. D. (1987). Use of sewage sludge on land in the United Kingdom. Water Science & Technology, 19(8), 1–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2001). Disposal and recycling routes for sewage sludge. Part 1—sludge use acceptance report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities ISBN 92-894-1798-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Communities Commission (1986). Council Directive 86/278/EEC: use of sewage sludge in agriculture, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 181, pp. 6–12. European Communities Commission, Brussels.

  • Evans, T. D. (2012). Biosolids in Europe, Proceedings of 26th WEF Residuals & Biosolids Conference. March 25–28, 2012 (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA).

  • Farouki, N. (1999). Water demand management—research network. Cairo: Presentation to the Donors Meeting of the IDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. E. (1995). Sewage sludge production, treatment and disposal in the European Union. Water Environment Journal, 9(4), 335–343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inglezakis, V. J., Zorpas, A. A., Karagianides, A., & Samaras P. (2011a). European Union legislation on sewage sludge management. Proceedings of the 3rd International CEMEPE & SECOTOX Conference Skiathos, June 19–24, (ISBN 978-960-6865-43-5).

  • Inglezakis, V. J., Zorpas, A. A., Karagianides, A., & Samaras P. (2011b). European Union legislation on sewage sludge management. Proceedings of the 3rd International CEMEPE & SECOTOX Conference Skiathos, June 19–24, (ISBN 978-960-6865-43-5).

  • Israel Reusing Sewage Sludge as Fertilizer (2011). (http://www.haaretz.com/israelreusingsewagesludgeasfertilizer1.393391, accessed on June 2, 2017).

  • Keraita, B., Jiménez, B., & Drechsel, P. (2008). Extent and implications of agricultural reuse of untreated, partly treated and diluted wastewater in developing countries. Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 3(58), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogmann, U., Gibson, V., & Chess, C. (2000). Land application of sewage sludge: perceptions of New Jersey vegetable farmers. Waste Management & Research, 19, 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matar, F. (2013). Assessment of public private partnership for energy and biosolids management of Madaba wastewater treatment plant—a case study. M.Sc. Thesis, Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine.

  • Milieu (2010). Environmental, economic and social impacts of the use of sewage sludge on land, Final Report, (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/, accessed on June 1, 2017).

  • Nassar, A., & Afifi, S. (2006). Assessment of existing and future sewage sludge characterization in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 28, 67–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar, A., Tubail, K., & Afifi, S. (2009). Attitudes of farmers toward sludge use in the Gaza Strip. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 10(1), 89–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (1996). Use of reclaimed water and sludge in food crop production. Committee on the Use of Treated Municipal Wastewater Effluents and Sludge in the Production of Crops for Human Consumption.

  • Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (2009). Census final results—population report-West Bank. Ramallah, Palestine.

  • Palestinian Water Authority (2009). Basic needs and development ongoing and proposed projects by governorates. Technical Report, Ramallah, Palestine.

  • Pasda, N., Panichsakpatana, S., Limtong, P., Oliver, R., & Montage, D. (2005). Evaluation of Bangkok sewage sludge for possible agriculture use. Waste Management & Research, 24, 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasda, N., Panichsakpatana, S., Limtong, P., Oliver, R., Montange, D. (2006). Evaluation of Bangkok sewage sludge for possible agricultural use. Waste management & research, 24(2), 167-174.

  • Peterson, J. W., Rodriguez, L. & Book, R. E. (1994). Sludge: benefit or blight. Identifying audience information needs and media preferences. Paper presented at the Media and the Environment conference, April 7–9, in Reno, NV.

  • Pritchard, N., Penney, M., McLaughlin, J., Rigby, H., & Schwarz, H. (2010). Land application of sewage sludge (biosolids) in Australia: risks to the environment and food crops. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 62(1), 48–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R., & Agrawal, M. (2008). Potential benefits and risks of land application of sewage sludge. Waste Management, 28, 347–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sripanomtanakorn, S., & Polprasert, C. (2001). Plant available nitrogen from anaerobically digested sludge and septic tank applied to crops grown in the tropics. Waste Management & Research, 20, 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L., & Stensel, H. D. (2002). Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal, and reuse (Fourth ed.). New York: Inc. Metcalf & Eddy. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016). Sewage sludge/biosolids program. Retrieved on September 20th, 2016 from: https://www3.epa.gov/region9/water/npdes/sludge.html

  • Vasseur, L., Shipley, E., & Ansseau, C. (1999). Potential for municipal sewage sludge application on agricultural lands in Southern Quebec. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 34(3), 469–480.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. (1997). Land application of sewage sludge in China. The Science of the Total Environment, 197, 149–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Chen, T., & Jia, Y. (2008). Studies on land application of sewage sludge and its limiting factors. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 160, 554–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yassin, M., & Abd Rabou, A. (2002). Perception of sludge use among farmers in northern governorate, Gaza Strip. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, 53, 517–530.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Purdue University Fort Wayne, 2101 E. Coliseum Blvd, Fort Wayne, IN, 46805, USA

    Md. M. Rashid

  2. Faculty of Graduate Studies, Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine

    Mary G. Kattou’a

  3. Institute of Environmental and Water Studies, Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine

    Issam A. Al-Khatib

  4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA

    Chikashi Sato

Authors
  1. Md. M. Rashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary G. Kattou’a
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Issam A. Al-Khatib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chikashi Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Issam A. Al-Khatib.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rashid, M.M., Kattou’a, M.G., Al-Khatib, I.A. et al. Farmers’ attitude toward treated sludge use in the villages of West Bank, Palestine. Environ Monit Assess 189, 353 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6074-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6074-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation