Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid survey protocol that provides dynamic information on reef condition to managers of the Great Barrier Reef

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Managing to support coral reef resilience as the climate changes requires strategic and responsive actions that reduce anthropogenic stress. Managers can only target and tailor these actions if they regularly receive information on system condition and impact severity. In large coral reef areas like the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP), acquiring condition and impact data with good spatial and temporal coverage requires using a large network of observers. Here, we describe the result of ~10 years of evolving and refining participatory monitoring programs used in the GBR that have rangers, tourism operators and members of the public as observers. Participants complete Reef Health and Impact Surveys (RHIS) using a protocol that meets coral reef managers’ needs for up-to-date information on the following: benthic community composition, reef condition and impacts including coral diseases, damage, predation and the presence of rubbish. Training programs ensure that the information gathered is sufficiently precise to inform management decisions. Participants regularly report because the demands of the survey methodology have been matched to their time availability. Undertaking the RHIS protocol we describe involves three ~20 min surveys at each site. Participants enter data into an online data management system that can create reports for managers and participants within minutes of data being submitted. Since 2009, 211 participants have completed a total of more than 10,415 surveys at more than 625 different reefs. The two-way exchange of information between managers and participants increases the capacity to manage reefs adaptively, meets education and outreach objectives and can increase stewardship. The general approach used and the survey methodology are both sufficiently adaptable to be used in all reef regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beeden, R., Willis, B. L., Raymundo, L. J., et al. (2009). Underwater cards for assessing coral health on Indo-Pacific reefs. Melbourne: Coral Reef Targeted Research and Capacity Building for Management Program. Currie Communications. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeden, R., Maynard, J. A., Marshall, P. A., et al. (2012). A framework for responding to coral disease outbreaks that facilitates adaptive management. Environmental Management, 49(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeden, R., Maynard, J., Johnson, J., et al. (2014). No-anchoring areas reduce coral damage in an effort to build resilience in Keppel Bay, southern Great Barrier Reef. Australian Journal of Environmental Management. doi:10.1080/14486563.2014.881307.

  • Bellwood, D. R., Hughes, T. P., Folke, C., & Nyström, M. (2004). Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature, 429, 827–833.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, J. F., & Selig, E. R. (2007). Regional decline of coral cover in the indo-pacific: timing, extent, and subregional comparisons. PLoS ONE, 8, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176(1–4), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D., & Balmford, A. (2005). Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(11), 2507–2542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D., Balmford, A., et al. (2009). Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology, 23(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D., Jensen, P. M., & Pirhofer-Walzl, K. (2010). Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of peoples involvement. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 1166–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, J. (2008). The need and practice of monitoring, evaluating and adapting marine planning and management—lessons from the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Policy, 32(5), 823–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, M., & Madin, J. (2011). Macroecological relationships between coral species’ traits and disease potential. Coral Reefs, 30(1), 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsdale, E. A., & Harriott, V. (2004). Assessing anchor damage on coral reefs: a case study in selection of environmental indicators. Environmental Management, 33(1), 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Done, T. J. (1999). Coral community adaptability to environmental change at the scales of regions, reefs and reef zones. American Zoologist, 39, 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Done, T. J., & Reichelt, R. E. (1998). Integrated coastal zone and fisheries ecosystem management: generic goals and performance indices. Ecological Applications, 8(1 (Supplement)), S110–S118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, S., Wilkinson, C., & Baker, V. (1997). Survey manual for tropical marine resources 2nd edition (p. 390). Townsville, Australia: Australian Institute of Marine Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius, K. E., De’ath, G., Puotinen, M. L., et al. (2008). Disturbance gradients on inshore and offshore coral reefs caused by a severe tropical cyclone. Limnology and Oceanography, 53(2), 690–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GBRMPA. (2004). Great Barrier Reef Marine Park zoning plan 2003. Townsville, Australia: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • GBRMPA. (2011). Impacts of tropical cyclone Yasi on the Great Barrier Reef. Townsville, Australia: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, N. A. J., Nash, K. L., & Kool, J. T. (2011). Coral reef recovery dynamics in a changing world. Coral Reefs, 30, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvell, C. D., Jordan-Dahlgren, E., Merkel, S., et al. (2007). Coral disease, environmental drivers and the balance between coral and microbial associates. Oceanography, 20(1), 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, M. E. (1997). The ecology and evolution of seaweed-herbivore interactions on coral reefs. Coral Reefs, 16(1), S67–S76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, N. T. (2003). Challenges and opportunities in integrating ecological knowledge across scales. Forest Ecology and Management, 181(1–2), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (2001). Reef check: the first step in community-based management. Bulletin of Marine Science, 69, 861–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2011). Coral reef ecosystems and anthropogenic climate change. Regional Environmental Change, 11(1), S215–S227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Mumby, P. J., Hooten, A. J., et al. (2007). Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science, 318, 1737–1742.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P., & Connell, J. H. (1999). Multiple stressors on coral reefs: a long-term perspective. Limnology and Oceanography, 44, 932–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P., Baird, A. H., Bellwood, D. R., et al. (2003). Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science, 301, 929–933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madin, J. S. (2005). Mechanical limitations of reef corals during hydrodynamic disturbances. Coral Reefs, 24(4), 630–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, H. (1998). Immediate benefits of establishing a ‘no-anchoring area’: a case study at two popular anchorages in the whitsundays (p. 28). Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P. A. (2000). Skeletal damage in reef corals: relating resistance to colony morphology. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 200, 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P. A., & Baird, A. H. (2000). Bleaching of corals on the Great Barrier Reef: differential susceptibilities among taxa. Coral Reefs, 19(2), 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, J. A., Turner, P. J., Anthony, K. R. N., et al. (2008). ReefTemp: an interactive monitoring system for coral bleaching using high-resolution SST and improved stress predictors. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, J. A., Johnson, J. E., Marshall, P. A., et al. (2009). A strategic framework for responding to coral bleaching events in a changing climate. Environmental Management, 44(1), 1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, J. A., Marshall, P. A., Johnson, J. E., & Harman, S. (2010). Building resilience into practical conservation: identifying local management responses to global climate change in the southern Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs, 29, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan, T. R., Donner, S. D., Maynard, J. A., et al. (2012). Prioritizing key resilience indicators to support coral reef management in a changing climate. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42884.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCook, L. J., Ayling, T., Cappo, M., et al. (2010). Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: a globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(43), 18278–18285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, M., Fallon, S., Wyndham, T., et al. (2003). Coral record of increased sediment flux to the inner great barrier reef since European settlement. Nature, 421, 727–730.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phinn, S., Dekker, A., Brando, V., & Roelfsema, C. M. (2005). Mapping water quality and substrate cover in optically complex coastal and reef waters: an integrated approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 51(1–4), 459–469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savan, B., Morgan, A. J., & Gore, C. (2003). Volunteer environmental monitoring and the role of the universities: the case of citizens’ environment watch. Environmental Management, 31(5), 0561–0568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweatman, H. (2008). No-take reserves protect coral reefs from predatory starfish. Current Biology, 18(14), R598–R599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uychiaoco, A. J., Arceo, H. O., Green, S. J., et al. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of reef protected areas by local fishers in the Philippines: tightening the adaptive management cycle. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(11), 2775–2794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, S., Werdell, P., Schaffelke, B., et al. (2012). Satellite-Derived Photic Depth on the Great Barrier Reef: Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Water Clarity. Remote Sensing, 4, 3781–3795. doi:10.3390/rs4123781.

  • Wilkinson, C. (Ed.). (2000). Status of coral reefs of the world: 2000. Townsville, Australia: Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network and Australian Institute of Marine Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C., Lindén, O., Cesar, H., et al. (1999). Ecological and socio-economic impacts of the 1998 coral mortality in the indian ocean: An ENSO impact and a warning of future change? Ambio, 28(2), 188–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, B. L., Page, C. A., & Dinsdale, E. A. (2004). Coral disease and the Great Barrier Reef. In E. Rosenberg & Y. Loya (Eds.), Coral health and disease (pp. 69–104). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for the development of the RHIS protocol and integrated Eye on the Reef program database and training tools was provided under the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority’s Climate Change Action Plan in partnership with the Queensland Department of National Parks Sport and Racing and Great Barrier Reef Field Management Program. The authors would like to acknowledge that this work has its foundations in the timed-swim-based joint GBRMPA/QPWS Rapid Assessment Monitoring Protocol (RAMP), the joint GBRMPA and Tourism Industry weekly Eye on the Reef survey and the GBRMPA-led Bleach Watch program. Beyond the team of authors, we would like to specifically thank Richard Quincey from the Great Barrier Reef Field Management Program; Sascha Taylor, Chris Maple and John Olds from the Queensland Department of National Parks Sport and Racing; Chris Briggs and Chris Jones from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority’s Tourism Section; and former GBRMPA staff members Peter McGinnity, Andrew Chin, Jo Johnson, Dean Miller and Robin Aeillo. We would also like to thank all of the participating Queensland Department of National Parks Sport and Racing rangers, GBRMPA and tourism industry staff who have completed RHIS surveys.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Beeden.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 10485 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beeden, R.J., Turner, M.A., Dryden, J. et al. Rapid survey protocol that provides dynamic information on reef condition to managers of the Great Barrier Reef. Environ Monit Assess 186, 8527–8540 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4022-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4022-0

Keywords

Navigation