Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Indoor air quality modeling for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 in naturally ventilated classrooms of an urban Indian school building

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of indoor air quality (IAQ) in classrooms of school buildings is of prime concern due to its potential effects on student’s health and performance as they spend a substantial amount of their time (6–7 h per day) in schools. A number of airborne contaminants may be present in urban school environment. However, respirable suspended particulate matter (RSPM) is of great significance as they may significantly affect occupants’ health. The objectives of the present study are twofold, one, to measure the concentrations of PM10 (<10 \(\upmu \)m), PM2.5 (<2.5 \(\upmu \)m), and PM1.0 (<1.0 \(\upmu \)m) in naturally ventilated classrooms of a school building located near a heavy-traffic roadway (9,755 and 4,296 vehicles/hour during weekdays and weekends, respectively); and second, to develop single compartment mass balance-based IAQ models for PM10 (NVIAQMpm10), PM2.5 (NVIAQMpm2.5), and PM1.0 (NVIAQMpm1.0) for predicting their indoor concentrations. Outdoor RSPM levels and classroom characteristics, such as size, occupancy level, temperature, relative humidity, and CO2 concentrations have also been monitored during school hours. Predicted indoor PM10 concentrations show poor correlations with observed indoor PM10 concentrations (R 2 = 0.028 for weekdays, and 0.47 for weekends). However, a fair degree of agreement (d) has been found between observed and predicted concentrations, i.e., 0.42 for weekdays and 0.59 for weekends. Furthermore, NVIAQMpm2.5 and NVIAQMpm1.0 results show good correlations with observed concentrations of PM2.5 (R 2 = 0.87 for weekdays and 0.9 for weekends) and PM1.0 (R 2 = 0.86 for weekdays and 0.87 for weekends). NVIAQMpm10 shows the tendency to underpredict indoor PM10 concentrations during weekdays as it does not take into account the occupant’s activities and its effects on the indoor concentrations during the class hours. Intense occupant’s activities cause resuspension or delayed deposition of PM10. The model results further suggests conductance of experimental and physical simulation studies on dispersion of particulates indoors to investigate their resuspension and settling behavior due to occupant’s activities/movements. The models have been validated at three different classroom locations of the school site. Sensitivity analysis of the models has been performed by varying the values of mixing factor (k) and newly introduced parameter R c. The results indicate that the change in values of k (0.33 to 1.00) does not significantly affect the model performance. However, change in value of R c (0.001 to 0.500) significantly affects the model performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASHRAE (1993). ASHRAE fundamentals handbook, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration systems. Inc. ASHRAE, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. H., & Koutrakis, P. (2006). Determining the infiltration of outdoor particles in the indoor environment using a dynamic model. Journal of Aerosol Science, 37, 766–785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Branis, M., Rezacova, P., & Domasova, M. (2005). The effect of outdoor air and indoor human activity on mass concentration of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 in a classroom. Environmental Research, 99, 143–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaloulakou, A., & Mavroidis, I. (2002). Comparison of indoor and outdoor concentrations of CO at a public school. Evaluation of an indoor air quality model. Atmospheric Environment, 36(11), 1769–1781.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. J., Hsieh, Y. F., & Kao, H. M. (2006). Numerical investigation of airflow pattern and particulate matter transport in naturally ventilated multi-room buildings. Indoor Air, 16(2), 136–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Life Sciences (1981). Indoor pollutants. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockery, D. W., & Spengler, J. D. (1981). Indoor and outdoor relationships of respirable sulfates and particles. Atmospheric Environment, 15, 335–343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esmen, N. A. (1978). Characterization of contaminant concentrations in enclosed spaces. Environmental Science and Technology, 12, 337–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro, A. R., Kopperud, R. J., & Hildmann, L. M. (2004). Source strength for indoor human activities that resuspend particulate matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(6), 1759–1764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friess, H., & Yadigaroglu, G. (2002). Modeling of the resuspension of particle clusters from multilayer aerosol deposits with variable porosity. Journal of Aerosol Science, 33, 883–906.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, C., Freihaut, J., & Bahnfleth, W. (2007). Resuspension of allergen-containing particles under mechanical and aerodynamic disturbances from human walking. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 5257–5270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, R., & Khare, M. (2009). Indoor–outdoor concentrations of RSPM in classroom of a naturally ventilated school building near an urban traffic roadway. Atmospheric Environment, 43(38), 6026–6038.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GRIMM Aerosol Technik, GmbH & Co. Germany (2003). Environmental dust monitor, model 107 and weather housing, model 165.

  • Hayes, S. R. (1989). Estimating the effect of being indoors on total personal exposure to outdoor air pollution. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 39(11), 1453–1461.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. R. (1991). Use of an indoor air quality model (IAQM) to estimate indoor ozone levels. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 41(2), 161–170.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, W. C. (1999). Aerosol technology: Properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, B., Freihaut, J. D., Bahnfleth, W., Gomes, C. A. S., & Thran, B. (2008). Literature review and parametric study: Indoor particle resuspension by human activity, (online available).

  • Hussein, T., Glytsos, T., Ondra, J., Dohanyosova, P., Zdımal, V., Hameri, K., et al. (2006). Particle size characterization and emission rates during indoor activities in a house. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 4285–4307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamriska, M., Morawska, L., & Ensor, D. S. (2003). Control strategies for sub-micrometer particles indoors: Model study of air filtration and ventilation. Indoor Air, 13(2), 96–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. C., Thornton, C. A., Mark, D., & Harrison, R. M. (2000). Indoor/outdoor relationships of particulate matter in domestic homes with roadside, urban and rural locations. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 2603–2612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juda, K. (1986). Modelling of the air pollution in the cracow area. Atmospheric Environment, 20(12), 2249–2258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, E., Berglund, T., Stromqvist, M., Nordstrand, M., & Fangmark, I. (1999). The effect of resuspension caused by human activities on the indoor concentration of biological aerosols. Journal Aerosol Science, 30(1), 737–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolokotroni, M., Ge, Y. T., & Katsoulas, D. (2002). Monitoring and modelling indoor air quality and ventilation in classroom within a purpose-designed naturally ventilated school. Indoor & Built Environment, 11, 316–326.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazaridis, M., & Drossinos, Y. (1998). Multilayer resuspension of small identical particles by turbulent flow. Aerosol Science and Technology, 28(6), 548–560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Chan, Z. (2003). A balance-point method for assessing the effect of natural ventilation on indoor particle concentrations. Atmospheric Environment, 37(30), 4277–4285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matson, U. (2005). Comparison of the modelling and the experimental results on concentrations of ultra-fine partcles indoors. Building and Environment, 40, 996–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendall, M. J., & Heath, G. A. (2005). Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? A critical review of the literature. Indoor Air, 15(1), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monn, C. (2001). Exposure assessment of air pollutants: A review on special heterogeneity and indoor/ outdoor/personal exposure to suspended particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide and ozone. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 1–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morawska, L., Hee, C., Hitcins, J., Gilbert, D., & Parappukkaran, S. (2001). The relationship between indoor and outdoor airborne particles in the residential environment. Atmospheric Environment, 35(20), 3463–3473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorster, G., Ferin, J., Gelein, R., & Weiss, B. (1995). Association of particulate air pollution and acute mortality: Involvement of ultrafine particles. Inhalation Toxicology, 7, 111–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, A., Wichmann, H. E., Tuch, T., Heinrich, J., & Heyder, J. (1997). Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 155, 1376–1383.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, C. A., Dockery, D. W., & Schwartz, J. (1995). Review of epidemiological evidence of health effects of particulate air pollution. Inhalation Toxicology, 7, 1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, J. D., Buchanan, C. R., & Dunn-Rankin, D. (2003). Measurement and prediction of indoor air flow in a model room. Energy and Buildings, 35(5), 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quest technologies (2000). IAQ monitor. Wisconsin: Quest technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riain, C. M., Mark, D., Davies, M., Harrison, R. M., & Byrne, M. A. (2003). Averaging periods for indoor–outdoor ratios of pollution in naturally ventilated non-domestic buildings near a busy road. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 4121–4132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaton, A., MacNee, W., Donaldson, K., & Godden, D. (1995). Particulate air pollution and acute health effects. Lancet, 345, 176–178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheff, P. A., Paulius, V. K., Huang, S. W., & Conroy, L. M. (2000). Indoor air quality in a middle school, part I: Use of CO2 as a trace for effective ventilation. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 15(11), 824–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, T. L., & Layton, D. W. (1995). Deposition, resuspension and penetration of particles within a residence. Atmospheric Environment, 29(13), 1487–1497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Theerachaisupakij, W., Matsusaka, S., Akashi, Y., & Masuda, H. (2003). Reentrainment of deposited particles by drag and aerosol collision. Journal of Aerosol Science, 34, 261–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tippayawong, N., & Khuntong, P. (2007). Model prediction of indoor particle concentrations in a public school classroom. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 30(6), 1077–1083.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wadden, R. A., & Scheff, P. A. (1983). Indoor air pollution: Characterization, prediction, control. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, L. (1996). Indoor particles: A review. Journal of the Air Waste Management Association, 46, 98–126.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, L. (2000). Correlations of personal exposure to particles with outdoor air measurements, a review of recent studies. Aerosol Science and Technology, 32, 15–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, C. J. (1982). Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, 63, 1309–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, C. J., Ackleson, S. G., Davis, R. E., Feddema, J. J., Klink, K. M., Legates, D. R., et al. (1985). Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. Journal of Geophysics Research, 90, 8995–9005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yocom, J. E. (1982). Indoor–outdoor air quality relationships: A critical review. Journal of Air Pollution Control Association, 32(5), 500–520.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, B., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Yang, X., & Huang, D. (2004). Comparison of indoor aerosol particle concentration and deposition in different ventilated rooms by numerical method. Building and Environment, 39(1), 1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zollner, I., Gabrio, T., & Link, B. (2007). Concentrations of particulate matter in schools in Southwest Germany. Inhalation Toxicology, 19(S1), 245–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India

    Radha Goyal & Mukesh Khare

Authors
  1. Radha Goyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mukesh Khare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radha Goyal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goyal, R., Khare, M. Indoor air quality modeling for PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0 in naturally ventilated classrooms of an urban Indian school building. Environ Monit Assess 176, 501–516 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1600-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1600-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation