Abstract
Environmental monitoring of landscapes is of increasing interest. To quantify landscape patterns, a number of metrics are used, of which Shannon’s diversity, edge length, and density are studied here. As an alternative to complete mapping, point sampling was applied to estimate the metrics for already mapped landscapes selected from the National Inventory of Landscapes in Sweden (NILS). Monte-Carlo simulation was applied to study the performance of different designs. Random and systematic samplings were applied for four sample sizes and five buffer widths. The latter feature was relevant for edge length, since length was estimated through the number of points falling in buffer areas around edges. In addition, two landscape complexities were tested by applying two classification schemes with seven or 20 land cover classes to the NILS data. As expected, the root mean square error (RMSE) of the estimators decreased with increasing sample size. The estimators of both metrics were slightly biased, but the bias of Shannon’s diversity estimator was shown to decrease when sample size increased. In the edge length case, an increasing buffer width resulted in larger bias due to the increased impact of boundary conditions; this effect was shown to be independent of sample size. However, we also developed adjusted estimators that eliminate the bias of the edge length estimator. The rates of decrease of RMSE with increasing sample size and buffer width were quantified by a regression model. Finally, indicative cost–accuracy relationships were derived showing that point sampling could be a competitive alternative to complete wall-to-wall mapping.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allard, A., Nilsson, B., Pramborg, K., Ståhl, G., & Sundquist, S. (2003). Manual for aerial photo interpretation in the National Inventory of Landscapes in Sweden NILS. Umeå, Sweden: Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences, SLU.
Allard, A., Esseen, P.-A., Holm, S., Högström, M., Marklund, L., Nilsson, B., et al. (2007). Fångst av vegetationsdata och Natura 2000-habitat i fjällen genom flygbildstolkning i IRF med punktgittermetodik (Catch of vegetation data and the Natura 2000 habitats in the mountains by Localization interpretation of the IRF with point lattice method). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Resource Management, Work Report 172 (in Swedish).
Carfagna, E., & Gallego, F. (1999). Thematic maps and statistics. In Land cover and land use information systems for European Union policy needs (pp. 219–228). Luxembourg: Office for Official publications of the European Communities.
Corona, P., Chirici, G., & Travaglini, D. (2004). Forest ecotone survey by line intersect sampling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere, 34, 1776–1783. doi:10.1139/x04-045.
Dahm, S. (2001). Investigation of forest edge lengths based on data of the first Federal Forest Inventory. Allgemeine Forst Und Jagdzeitung, 172, 81–86.
DeVries, P. G. (1986). Sampling theory for forest inventory. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
Eiden, G., Jadues, P., & Theis, R. (2005). Linear landscape features in the European Union. Developing indicators related to linear landscape features based on LUCAS transect data an EU publication report EUR 21669 “Trends of some agri-environmental indicators in the European Commission”.
Ekman, T., & Eriksson, G. (1981). Programmering i Fortran 77(in Swedish). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
EPA (2003). Environmental Monitoring Program. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
Esseen, P. A., Jansson, K. U., & Nilsson, M. (2006). Forest edge quantification by line intersect sampling in aerial photographs. Forest Ecology and Management, 230, 32–42. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.012.
Fang, S. F., Gertner, G., Wang, G. X., & Anderson, A. (2006). The impact of misclassification in land use maps in the prediction of landscape dynamics. Landscape Ecology, 21, 233–242. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-1051-7.
FAO (2000). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, forestry paper, 140. Rome.
Fjellstad, W. J., & Dramstad, W. E. (1999). Patterns of change in two contrasting Norwegian agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 45, 177–191. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00055-9.
Freese, F. (1962). Elementary forest sampling. Washington D.C.: USDA Forest service.
Gregoire, T. G., & Valentine Harry, T. (2005). Sampling techniques for natural and environmental resources. Boca Raton, Fla. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Hernandez-Stefanoni, J. L. (2006). The role of landscape patterns of habitat types on plant species diversity of a tropical forest in Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 1441–1457. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-0598-6.
Hunsaker, C. T., O’Neill, R. V., Jackson, B. L., Timmins, S. P., Levine, D. A., & Norton, D. J. (1994). Sampling to characterize landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 9, 207–226. doi:10.1007/BF00134748.
Kleinn, C. (2000). Estimating metrics of forest spatial pattern from large area forest inventory cluster samples. Forest Science, 46, 548–557.
Kleinn, C., & Traub, B. (2003). Describing landscape pattern by sampling methods. In Advances in forest inventory for sustainable forest management and biodiversity monitoring (Vol. 76, pp. 175–189).
Kleinn, C., & Vilcko, F. (2006). A new empirical approach for estimation in k-tree sampling. Forest Ecology and Management, 237, 522–533. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.072.
Lindgren, O. (1984). A study on circular sampling of Swedish forest compartments, Swedish University of Agriculture Science, Department of Biometry and Forest Management. (Thesis).
Lu, D., & Weng, Q. (2007). A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28, 823–870. doi:10.1080/01431160600746456.
McGarigal, K., & Marks, E. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape pattern. General Technical Report 351. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Metropolis, N., & Ulam, S. (1949). The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, 335–341. doi:10.2307/2280232.
NIJOS (2001). Norwegian 3Q Monitoring Program. Norwegian institute of land inventory.
Raj, D. (1968). Sampling theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ricotta, C., Corona, P., & Marchetti, M. (2003). Beware of contagion!. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62, 173–177. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00146-9.
Schreuder, H., Ernst, R., & Ramirez-Maldonado, H. (2004). Statistical techniques for sampling and monitoring natural resources. Washington D.C.: USDA, Forest service.
Smith, H. F. (1938). An empirical law describing heterogeneity in the yields of agricultural crops. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 28, 1–23.
Ståhl, G. (1998). Transect relascope sampling—a method for the quantification of coarse woody debris. Forest Science, 44, 58–63.
Thompson, S. K. (2002). Sampling (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Turner, M. G. (1989). Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 171–197. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131.
Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H., & O’Neill, R. V. (2001). Landscape ecology in theory and practice: Pattern and process. New York: Springer.
U.S. Environment Protection Agency (1994). Landscape Monitoring and Assessment Research Plan, EPA 620/DRAFT, Office of research and Development, Washington. D.C.
Vencatasawmy, C., Reese, H., & Olsson, H. (2000). The spatial normalisation of SPOT images using Point Spread Functions. In Proceedings of the international conference on integrating geographic information systems and environmental modeling: Problems, prospects, and needs for research, Banff, Canada.
Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., Hay, G. J., & Castilla, G. (2008). Towards automated segmentation of forest inventory polygons on high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Forestry Chronicle, 84, 221–230.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramezani, H., Holm, S., Allard, A. et al. Monitoring landscape metrics by point sampling: accuracy in estimating Shannon’s diversity and edge density. Environ Monit Assess 164, 403–421 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0902-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0902-0