Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and implementation of coral reef biocriteria in U.S. jurisdictions

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coral reefs worldwide are declining at an alarming rate and are under continuous threat from both natural and anthropogenic environmental stressors. Warmer sea temperatures attributed to global climate change and numerous human activities at local scales place these valuable ecosystems at risk. Reefs provide numerous services, including shoreline protection, fishing, tourism and biological diversity, which are lost through physical damage, overfishing, and pollution. Pollution can be controlled under provisions of the Clean Water Act, but these options have not been fully employed to protect coral reefs. No U.S. jurisdiction has implemented coral reef biocriteria, which are narrative or quantitative water quality standards based on the condition of a biological resource or assemblage. The President’s Ocean Action Plan directs the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop biological assessment methods and biological criteria for evaluating and maintaining the health of coral reef ecosystems. EPA has formed the Coral Reef Biocriteria Working Group (CRBWG) to foster development of coral reef biocriteria through focused research, evaluation and communication among Agency partners and U.S. jurisdictions. Ongoing CRBWG activities include development and evaluation of a rapid bioassessment protocol for application in biocriteria programs; development of a survey design and monitoring strategy for the U.S. Virgin Islands; comprehensive reviews of biocriteria approaches proposed by states and territories; and assembly of data from a variety of monitoring programs for additional metrics. Guidance documents are being prepared to assist U.S. jurisdictions in reaching protective and defensible biocriteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, J. C., & Pickard, G. L. (1990). The physical oceanography of coral-reef systems. In Z. Dubinsky (Ed.), Ecosystems of the World, volume 25, coral reef (pp. 11–48). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, R. B., Edmunds, P. J., Precht, W. F., Swanson, D. W., & Levitan, D. R. (1994). Large-scale, long-term monitoring of Caribbean coral reefs: Simple, quick, inexpensive techniques. Atoll Research Bulletin, 421, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, R. T., Hilting, A. K., & Hayes, M. L. (2001). The changing health of coral reefs. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 7(5), 1255–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F., Field, J. C., & Scavia, D. (Eds.) (2000). The potential consequences of climate variability and change on coastal areas and marine resources. Silver Spring: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. E., & Howard, L. S. (1985). Assessing the effects of “stress” on reef coral. Advances in Marine Biology, 22, 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, A., & Burrows, F. M. (2005). Restoration monitoring of coral reefs. In G. W. Thayer, T. A. McTigue, R. J. Salz, D. H. Merkey, F. M. Burrows, & P. F. Gayaldo (Eds.), Science-based restoration monitoring of coastal habitats, volume two: Tools for monitoring coastal habitats (pp. 3.1–3.72). Silver Spring: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, D., Burke, L., McManus, J., & Spaulding, M. (1998). Reefs at risk: A map-based indicators of threats to the world’s coral reefs. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesar, H., Burke, L., & Pet-Soede, L. (2003). Economics of worldwide coral reef degradation. Netherlands: World Wildlife Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coral Reef Conservation Act of 2000 (CRCA) (2000). [P.L. 106-562; 16 U.S.C. 6401 et seq; December 23, 2000].

  • Courtney, L. A., Fisher, W. S., Raimondo, S., Oliver, L. M., & Davis, W. P. (2007). Estimating three-dimensional colony surface area of field corals. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 351, 234–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, M. P., Gibson, G. R., & Potts, K. W. (Eds.) (1996). A coral reef symposium on practical, reliable, low cost monitoring methods for assessing the biota and habitat conditions of coral reefs, January 26–27, 1995. Silver Spring: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, K., Hammet, M., & Minato, C. (2003). The first four years: Hawaii coral reef initiative research program (1998–2002). Social Science Research Institute, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 72 pp.

  • Ecological Society of America (ESA) (2000). Ecosystem services: A primer. Washington, DC.

  • Fisher, W. S. (2007). Stony coral rapid bioassessment protocol (60 pp.), EPA/600/R-06/167. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. S., Davis, W. P., Quarles, R. L., Patrick, J., Campbell, J. G., Harris, P. S., et al. (2007). Characterizing coral condition using estimates of three-dimensional colony surface area. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 125, 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) (2005). 2004 CREMP executive summary, May 2005. St. Petersburg, FL.

  • Fore, L. S., Fisher, W. S., & Davis, W. S. (2006a). Bioassessment tools for stony corals: Statistical evaluation of candidate metrics in the Florida Keys. EPA-260-R-06-002. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fore, L. S., Fisher, W. S., & Davis, W. S. (2006b). Bioassessment tools for stony corals: Field testing of monitoring protocols in the US Virgin Islands (St. Croix). EPA-260-R-06-004. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, B. G., Imberger, J., & Smith, S. V. (1987). Scaling analysis of coral reef systems: An approach to problems of scale. Coral Reefs, 5, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (1999). Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world’s coral reefs. Marine and Freshwater Research, 50, 839–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houk, P., Didonato, G., Iguel, J., & van Woesik, R. (2005). Assessing the effects of non-point source pollution on American Samoa’s coral reef communities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 107, 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, D. K. (1997). Reefs as dynamic systems. In C. Birkeland (Ed.), Life and death of coral reefs (pp. 43–67). New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. E., Kurtz, J. C., & Fisher, W. S. (Eds.) (2000). Evaluation guidelines for ecological indicators. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA/620/R-99/005, Office of Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, S. C., Erdmann, M. V., Karr, J. R., Gibson, J. R., & Potts, K. W. (2001). Charting a course toward diagnostic monitoring: A continuing review of coral reef attributes and a research strategy for creating coral reef indexes of biotic integrity. Bulletin of Marine Science, 69, 701–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G. M., Leeworthy, V. R., Bell, F. W., & Bonn, M. A. (2001). Socioeconomic study of reefs in southeast Florida. Report (Hazen and Sawyer) to Broward County, Palm Beach County, Miami-Dade County (Florida), Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 255 pp.

  • Jokiel, P. L., & Brown, E. K. (2000). Coral reef assessment and monitoring program (CRAMP) final report 1998–1999. Kaneohe: Hawai’i Institute of Marine Biology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokiel, P. L., Brown, E. K., Friedlander, A., Ku′ulei Rodgers, S., & Smith, W. R. (2004). Hawai’i coral reef assessment and monitoring program: Spatial patterns and temporal dynamics in reef coral communities. Pacific Science, 58(2), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. (1991). Biological integrity: A long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecological Applications, 1, 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. (1993). Measuring biological integrity: Lessons from streams. In S. Woodley, J. Kay, & G. Francis (Eds.), Ecological integrity and the management of ecosystems (pp. 83–104). Delray Beach: St. Lucie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. (1995). Protecting aquatic ecosystems: Clean water is not enough. In W. S. Davis & T. P. Simon (Eds.), Biological assessment and criteria: Tools for water resource planning and decisions making. Boca Raton: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., & Chu, E. W. (1999). Restoring life in running waters: Better biological monitoring. Washington, DC: Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. (1997). Ecology: A bridge between science and society. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, J. C. (1997). Ecosystem interactions in the tropical coastal seascape. In C. Birkeland (Ed.), Life and death of coral reefs (pp. 288–297). New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, R. H. (1993). Coral reefs: Present problems and future concerns resulting from anthropogenic disturbance. American Zoologist, 33, 524–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. S., Garrison, G., Grober, R., Hillis, Z. M., & Franke, M. A. (1994). Coral reef monitoring manual for the Caribbean and Western Atlantic. U.S. Virginia Islands: National Park Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohmann, S. O., Hayes, J. J., Newhall, R. C., Monaco, M. E., & Grigg, R. W. (2005). The area of potential shallow-water tropical and subtropical coral ecosystems in the United States. Coral Reefs, 24-3, 370–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebens, K. P. (1994). Biodiversity of coral reefs: What we are losing and why. American Zoologist, 34, 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shick, J. M., Lesser, M. P., & Jokiel, P. L. (1996). Effects of ultraviolet radiation on corals and other coral reef organisms. Global Change Biology, 2, 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy (TNC) (2006). Are Florida’s reefs resilient? A guide to the Florida reef resilience program. Summerland Key, Florida.

  • Turgeon, D. D., Asch, R. G., Causey, B. D., Dodge, R. E., Japp, W., Banks, K., et al. (2002). The state of coral reef ecosystems of the United States and Pacific Freely Associated States: 2002. Silver Spring: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) (1984). Comparing coral reef survey methods. Paris, France.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2007). About EPA’s report on the environment. Retrieved June 17, 2007 from www.epa.gov/indicators/abouteii.htm.

  • Waddell, J. E. (Ed.) (2005). The state of coral reef ecosystems of the United States and Pacific Freely Associated States: 2005. Silver Spring: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. W. (1957). Scleractinia. In R. C. Morre (Ed.), Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part F. Coelentrata (pp. 328–444). Boulder: Geological Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C. R. (1996). Global change and coral reefs: Impacts on reefs, economies and human cultures. Global change Biology, 2, 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C. (Ed.) (2004). Status of coral reefs of the world: 2004 (Vol. 1). Townsville, Queensland, Australia: Australian Institute of Marine Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Bradley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradley, P., Fisher, W.S., Bell, H. et al. Development and implementation of coral reef biocriteria in U.S. jurisdictions. Environ Monit Assess 150, 43–51 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0670-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0670-2

Keywords

Navigation