Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Landsat Satellite Monitoring on Conservation Biology

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landsat 7’s recent malfunctioning will result in significant gaps in long-term satellite monitoring of Earth, affecting not only the research of the Earth science community but also conservation users of these data. To determine whether or how important Landsat monitoring is for conservation and natural resource management, we reviewed the Landsat program’s history with special emphasis on the development of user groups. We also conducted a bibliographic search to determine the extent to which conservation research has been based on Landsat data. Conservation biologists were not an early user group of Landsat data because a) biologists lacked technical capacity – computers and software – to analyze these data; b) Landsat’s 1980s commercialization rendered images too costly for biologists’ budgets; and c) the broad-scale disciplines of conservation biology and landscape ecology did not develop until the mid-to-late 1980s. All these conditions had changed by the 1990s and Landsat imagery became an important tool for conservation biology. Satellite monitoring and Landsat continuity are mandated by the Land Remote Sensing Act of 1992. This legislation leaves open commercial options. However, past experiments with commercial operations were neither viable nor economical, and severely reduced the quality of monitoring, archiving and data access for academia and the public. Future satellite monitoring programs are essential for conservation and natural resource management, must provide continuity with Landsat, and should be government operated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous: 1964,‘Foreword’, in: Proceedings of the First Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, 13–15 February 1962, Infrared Laboratory, Institute of Science and Technology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.

  • Bowler, P.: 1993, The Norton History of the Environmental Sciences, W.W. Norton, New York, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, D., Nielsen, D. and Tangley, L.: 1997, The Last Frontier Forests: Ecosystems and Economics at the Edge, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen, C.: 1995,‘Development and conservation on Costa Rica’s Osa Peninsula, 1937–1977: A regional case study of historical land use policy and practice in a small neotropical country’, Ph.D. Diss., The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, M. A.: 2001,‘Synergistic interactions between habitat fragmentation and fire in evergreen tropical forests’, Conserv. Biol. 15, 1515–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draeger, W. C., Holm, T. M., Lauer, D. T. and Thompson, R. J.: 1997,‘The availability of Landsat data: Past, present, and future’, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 63, 869–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doake, C. S. M. and Vaughan, D. G.: 1991,‘Rapid disintegration of the Wordie Ice Shelf in response to atmospheric warming’, Nature 350, 328–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustan, P., Dobson, E. and Nelson, G. A.: 2001,‘Landsat Thematic Mapper: Detection of shifts in community composition of coral reefs’, Conserv. Biol. 15, 892–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goward, S. N. and Williams, D. L.: 1997,‘Landsat and earth systems science: Development of terrestrial monitoring’, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 63, 887–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goward, S. N., Masek, J. G., Williams, D. L. and Irons, J. R.: 1999, The Landsat Science Mission: Today and Tomorrow, Technical Report, Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goward, S. N., Masek, J. G., Williams, D. L. and Irons, J. R.: 2000, The Landsat 7 Mission: Terrestrical Research for the 21st Century, Technical Report, Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J. J.: 2001,‘On the Value of Coordinating Landsat Operations’, Master’s Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. D., Idso, S. B. and Otterman, J.: 1975,‘Surface albedo and desertification’, Science 189, 1012–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. L.: 1998, What it Took: A History of the USGS EROS Data Center, Center for Western Studies, Augustana College, Sioux Falls, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, J. T. and Ostrovsky, M.: 2003,‘From space to species: Ecological applications of remote sensing’, TREE 18, 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffler, R. and Spayd, L.: 1990,‘30 Years of Operational Environmental Satellites: A Retrospective and Future View of the United States Program’, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A., April 1990, Vol. 1, 18–25, 87–105.

  • Landgrebe, D.: 1997,‘The evolution of Landsat data analysis’, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 63, 859–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambkin, E.: 2003,‘Editorial’, LUCC Newsletter 9, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, D. T., Morain, S. A. and Salomonson, V. V.: 1997,‘The Landsat program: Its origins, evolution and impacts’, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 63, 831–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, R. O., Nair, U.S., Pielke, R. A., Sr. and Welch, R. M.: 2001,‘Climatic impact of tropical lowland deforestation on nearby montane cloud forests’, Science 294, 584–587.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M.: 2004, Inventing Global Ecology: Tracking the Biodiversity Ideal in India, 1947–1997, Ohio University Press, Athens, OH, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, P. E.: 1990, Viewing the Earth: The Social Construction of the Landsat Satellite System, MIT Press, Cambridge, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, P. E.: 1992,‘Making big technology serve the user: U.S. Remote Sensing Programs,’ Hist. Technol. 9, 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, P. E. and Williamson, R. A.: 1998,‘Observing the Earth from Space’, in: J. M. Logsdon, R. D. Launius, D. H. Onkst and S. J. Garber (eds), Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in the History of the U.S. Civil Space Program, NASA History Division, Washington, DC, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. and Kent, J.: 2000,‘Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities’, Nature 403, 853–858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad, D. C., Verissimo, A., Alencar, A., Nobre, C. A., Eirivelthon, L., Lefebvre, P., Schlesinger, P., Potter, C., Moutinho, P., Mendoza, E., Cochrane, M. A. and Brooks, V.: 1999,‘Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire’, Nature 398, 505–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F.: 1987,‘From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: A look at The Nature Conservancy’, Biol. Cons. 41, 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Abell, R., Allnutt, T., Carpenter, C., McClenchan, L., D’Amico, J., Hurley, P., Kassen, K., Strand, H., Taye, M. and Thieme, M.: 2000, The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Distinctive Ecoregions, Technical Report, World Wildlife Fund U.S., Washington DC.

  • O’Neal, R. D.: 1990,‘Welcoming Address’, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 1, 18–25 April 1990, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A., 15–17.

  • Otterman, J.: 1976,‘No desertification mechanism’, Science 194, 747–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L. and Brooks, T. M.: 1995,‘The future of biodiversity’, Science 269, 347–350.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reichhardt, T.: 1999,‘Research to benefit from cheaper Landsat images’, Nature 400, 702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J., Running, S. W. and Matson, P. A.: 1991,‘What does remote sensing do for ecology?’, Ecology 72, 1918–1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, A. G. A., Harriss, R. C. and Skole, D.: 2001,‘Deforestation in Costa Rica: A quantitative analysis using remote sensing imagery’, Biotropica 33, 378–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. J., Davis, F., Csuti, B., Noss, R., Butterfield, B., Groves, C., Anderson, H., Caicco, S., D’Ericha, F., Edwards, T. C., Ulliman, J. and Wright, R. G.: 1993,‘Gap analysis: A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity’, Wildl. Monogr. 123, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shay, J. R.: 1964,‘Report of the Working Group on Agriculture, Forestry, and Botany’, in: Proceedings of the First Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, 13–15 February 1962, Infrared Laboratory, Institute of Science and Technology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.

  • Sheffner, E. J.: 1994,‘The Landsat program: Recent history and prospects’, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 60, 735–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skole, D. and Tucker, C. J.: 1993,‘Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data from 1978 to 1988’, Science 260, 1905–1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E. and Orians, G.: 2001,‘Preface’, in M. Soulé and G. Orians (eds), Conservation Biology: Research Priorities for the Next Decade, Island Press, Covelo, CA, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steininger, M. K., Tucker, C. J., Ersts, P., Killeen, T. J., Villegas, Z. and Hecht, S. B.: 2001,‘Clearance and fragmentation of tropical deciduous forest in Tierras Bajas, Santa Cruz, Bolivia’, Conserv. Biol. 15, 856–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. J., Grant, D. M. and Dykstra, J. D.: 2004,‘NASA’s global orthorectified Landsat data set’, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 70, 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W., Spector, S., Gardiner, N., Fladeland, M., Sterling, E. and Steininger, M.: 2003,‘Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation’, TREE 18, 306–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey: 2003a,‘Landsat: A global land-observing program’, USGS Fact Sheet 023-03, 1–4.

  • United States Geological Survey: 2003b,‘Landsat monthly update – June 2003’, Online Newsletter 1–3.

  • United States Geological Survey: 2004,‘Landsat monthly update – April 2004’, Online Newsletter 1–3.

  • Weart, S. R.: 2003, The Discovery of Global Warming, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weart, S. R.: 2004, The Discovery of Global Warming, 2004 Text, http://www.aip.org/history/climate/index.html#contents.

  • Wilson, E. O.: 1994, Naturalist, Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, E. B.: 1975, The Evolution of IBP, Cambridge University Press, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine A. Christen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leimgruber, P., Christen, C.A. & Laborderie, A. The Impact of Landsat Satellite Monitoring on Conservation Biology. Environ Monit Assess 106, 81–101 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-0763-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-0763-0

Keywords

Navigation