Skip to main content
Log in

A quarter century of decline of autopsies in the Netherlands

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Autopsy rates have been declining worldwide. The present study reports the outcome of a retrospective analysis of all non-forensic autopsies in the Netherlands over a course of 25 years, and compares these with the most recent Dutch study.

Method

Retrospectively, 25 years of data on clinical autopsies from the Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo- and Cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA) was paired with the mortality registry (Statistics Netherlands).

Results

The crude prevalence of autopsies declined from 7.07% in 1991 to 2.73% in 2015. After adjusting for age at death, there was no difference in autopsy rate between males and females. An increasing age significantly decreased the autopsy rate.

Conclusion

In the Netherlands, clinical autopsies have been declining over the last quarter century. Age at death, but not sex, was associated with the autopsy rate. These different results stress the importance of correct collection and analysis methods of data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Burton JL, Underwood J. Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet. 2007;369(9571):1471–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Turnbull A, Osborn M, Nicholas N. Hospital autopsy: endangered or extinct? J Clin Pathol. 2015;68(8):601–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raut A, Andrici J, Severino A, Gill AJ. The death of the hospital autopsy in Australia? The hospital autopsy rate is declining dramatically. Pathology. 2016;48(7):645–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaensbacher S, Waldhoer T, Berzlanovich A. The slow death of autopsies: a retrospective analysis of the autopsy prevalence rate in Austria from 1990 to 2009. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(7):577–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grassow-Narlik M, Wessolly M, Friemann J. Autopsy rates in Germany. Pathologe. 2017;38(5):422–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuijpers CC, Fronczek J, van de Goot FR, Niessen HW, van Diest PJ, Jiwa M. The value of autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: discrepant findings persist. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67(6):512–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wittschieber D, Klauschen F, Kimmritz AC, von Winterfeld M, Kamphues C, Scholman HJ, et al. Who is at risk for diagnostic discrepancies? Comparison of pre- and postmortal diagnoses in 1800 patients of 3 medical decades in East and West Berlin. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e37460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwanda-Burger S, Moch H, Muntwyler J, Salomon F. Diagnostic errors in the new millennium: a follow-up autopsy study. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(6):777–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2849–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blokker BM, Weustink AC, Hunink MGM, Oosterhuis JW. Autopsy rates in the Netherlands: 35 years of decline. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0178200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Statistics Netherlands. Statline. https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/37556/table?ts=1573559612666.

  12. Casparie M, Tiebosch AT, Burger G, Blauwgeers H, van de Pol A, van Krieken JH, et al. Pathology databanking and biobanking in The Netherlands, a central role for PALGA, the nationwide histopathology and cytopathology data network and archive. Cell Oncol. 2007;29(1):19–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. 2000;19(3):335–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van den Tweel JG, Wittekind C. The medical autopsy as quality assurance tool in clinical medicine: dreams and realities. Virchows Arch. 2016;468(1):75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smits CH, van den Beld HK, Aartsen MJ, Schroots JJ. Aging in the Netherlands: state of the art and science. Gerontologist. 2014;54(3):335–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bartholomeus G. H. Latten.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latten, B.G.H., Overbeek, L.I.H., Kubat, B. et al. A quarter century of decline of autopsies in the Netherlands. Eur J Epidemiol 34, 1171–1174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00572-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00572-9

Keywords

Navigation