Abstract
Gesturally controlled information and communication technologies, such as tablet devices, are becoming increasingly popular tools for teaching and learning. Based on the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and embodied cognition, this study investigated the impact of explicit instructions to trace out elements of tablet-based worked examples on mathematical problem-solving. Participants were 61 primary school children (8–11 years), who studied worked examples on an iPad either by tracing temperature graphs with their index finger or without such tracing. Results confirmed the main hypothesis that finger tracing as a form of biologically primary knowledge would support the construction of biologically secondary knowledge needed to understand temperature graphs. Children in the tracing condition achieved higher performance on transfer test questions. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R., Davoli, C., Du, F., Knapp, W., III, & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107, 1035–1047.
Alibali, M. W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 307–331.
Alibali, M. W., & DiRusso, A. A. (1999). The function of gesture in learning to count: more than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14, 37–56.
Atkinson, R., Lin, L., & Harrison, C. (2009). Comparing the efficacy of different signaling techniques. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 954–962). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/31608.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.
Bara, F., Gentaz, E., & Colé, P. (2007). Haptics in learning to read with children from low socio-economic status families. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 643–663.
Bara, F., Gentaz, E., Colé, P., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). The visuo-haptic and haptic exploration of letters increases the kindergarten-children’s understanding of the alphabetic principle. Cognitive Development, 19, 433–449.
Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Board of Studies NSW Syllabuses for the Australian curriculum (2012). Mathematics K-10, Stage 3, Statistics and Probability. Retrieved March 20, from http://syllabus.bos.nsw.edu.au/mathematics/mathematics-k10/content/1147/.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2014). Learning from observing hands in static and animated versions of non-manipulative tasks. Learning and Instruction, 34, 11–22.
Chum, M., Bekkering, H., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2007). Motor and visual codes interact to facilitate visuospatial memory performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1189–1193.
Colonnesi, C., Stams, G. J. J. M., Koster, I., & Noom, M. J. (2010). The relation between pointing and language development: a meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 352–366.
Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362.
Cosman, J., & Vecera, S. (2010). Attention affects visual perceptual processing near the hand. Psychological Science, 21, 1254–1258.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
de Koning, B., & Tabbers, H. (2013). Gestures in instructional animations: a helping hand to understanding non-human movements? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 683–689.
Docebo (2014). E-Learning Market Trends & Forecast 2014–2016 Report. Retrieved from http://www.docebo.com/elearning-lms-resources/papers-researches/.
Evans, M. A., Williamson, K., & Pursoo, T. (2008). Preschoolers’ attention to print during shared book reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 106–129.
Foglia, L., & Wilson, R. A. (2013). Embodied cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4, 319–325.
Geary, D. C. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science. Educational Psychologist, 43, 179–195.
Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: meta-analyses of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16, 511–525.
Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 573–585.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Learning through gesture. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2, 595–607.
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 297–315.
Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2014). Does tracing worked examples enhance geometry learning? Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 14, 45–49.
Hu, F.-T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2015). Getting the point: tracing worked examples enhances learning. Learning and Instruction, 35, 85–93.
Hulme, C., Monk, A., & Ives, S. (1987). Some experimental studies of multi-sensory teaching: the effects of manual tracing on children’s paired-associate learning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 299–307.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC horizon report: 2014 K-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Justice, L. M., Kaderavek, J. N., Fan, X., Sofka, A., & Hunt, A. (2009). Accelerating preschoolers’early literacy development through classroom-based teacher-child storybook reading and explicitprint referencing. Language, Speech, and Hearing in Schools, 40, 67–85.
Kalenine, S., Pinet, L., & Gentaz, E. (2011). The visual and visuo-haptic exploration of geometrical shapes increases their recognition in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 18–26.
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509–539.
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: united brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 31–42.
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: the collective working memory effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 615–624.
Kita, S. (2001). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leahy, W., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When auditory presentations should and should not to be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(4), 401–418.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load and the imagination effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(7), 857–875.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 943–951.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2005). Interactions among the imagination, expertise reversal, and element interactivity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 266–276.
Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van Der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32–42.
Liszkowski, U., Brown, P., Callaghan, T., Takada, A., & de Vos, C. (2012). A prelinguistic gestural universal of human communication. Cognitive Science, 36, 698–713.
Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Henning, A., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Twelve-month-olds point to share attention and interest. Developmental Science, 7, 297–307.
Macken, L., & Ginns, P. (2014). Pointing and tracing gestures may enhance anatomy and physiology learning. Medical Teacher, 36, 569–601.
Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & DaPra, C. S. (2012). An embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 239–252.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Montessori, M. (1912/1964). The Montessori Method. Cambridge, MA: Robert Bentley, Inc.
Moreno, R., Reislein, M., & Ozogul, G. (2010). Using virtual peers to guide visual attention during learning. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 52–60.
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429.
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 27–45.
Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198.
Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., McGinty, A. S., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2012). Increasing young children’s contact with print during shared reading: longitudinal effects on literacy achievement. Child Development, 83, 810–820.
Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognitive Science, 34, 602–619.
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
Sheu, F.-R., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Taking a signal: a review of gesture-based computing research in education. Computers in Education, 78, 268–277.
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 411–417.
Spence, C. (2010). Crossmodal spatial attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 182–200.
Spitzer, M. (2013). To swipe or not to swipe?—the question in present day education. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2, 95–99.
Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 43, 216–266.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 400–410.
Wong, A., Marcus, N., Smith, L., Cooper, G. A., Ayres, P., Paas, F., et al. (2009). Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 339–347.
Van der Burg, E., Olivers, C., Bronkhorst, A., & Theeuwes, J. (2009). Poke and pop: tactile-visual synchrony increases visual saliency. Neuroscience Letters, 450, 60–64.
Van Gog, T., Ericsson, K. A., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2005). Instructional design for advanced learners: establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 73–81.
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2009). The mirror-neuron system and observational learning: implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 21–30.
Wong, A., Leahy, W., Marcus, N., & Sweller, J. (2012). Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 449–457.
Acknowledgment
This research was funded by the University of Wollongong’s Research Council Small Grant Scheme, 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agostinho, S., Tindall-Ford, S., Ginns, P. et al. Giving Learning a Helping Hand: Finger Tracing of Temperature Graphs on an iPad. Educ Psychol Rev 27, 427–443 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9315-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9315-5