Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Property Prices and Exposure to Multiple Noise Sources: Hedonic Regression with Road and Railway Noise

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the effect of road and railway noise on property prices. It uses the hedonic regression technique on a Swedish data set that contains information about both road and railway noise for each property, and finds that road noise has a larger negative impact on the property prices than railway noise. This is in line with the evidence from the acoustical literature which has shown that individuals are more disturbed by road than railway noise, but contradicts recent results from a hedonic study on data of the United Kingdom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson H (2008) Willingness to pay for car safety: evidence from Sweden. Environ Resour Econ 41(4): 579–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson H, Ögren M (2007) Noise charges in rail infrastructure: a pricing schedule based on the marginal cost principle. Trans Policy 14(3):204–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson H, Ögren M (2007) Noise charges in road traffic: a pricing schedule based on the marginal cost principle. Working Paper 2007:15, VTI, Department of Transport Economics, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Anselin L (1999) Spatial econometrics. Mimeo, University of Texas at Dallas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (2003) Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(2): 153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsenio E, Bristow AL, Wardman M (2006) Stated choice valuations of traffic related noise. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 11(1): 15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranzini A, Ramirez JV (2005) Paying for quiteness: the impact of noise on geneva rents. Urban Stud 42(4): 633–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranzini A, Schaerer C, Ramirez JV, Thalmann P (2008) Feel it or measure it. Percieved versus measured noise in hedonic models. EAERE 16th Annual Conference

  • Bateman I, Day B, Lake I, Lovett A (2001) The effects of road traffic on residential property values: a literature review and hedonic pricing study. Technical report, University of East Anglia, Economic & Social Research Council, and Univeristy College London

  • Bateman IJ, Day BH, Iain L (2004) The valuation of transport-related noise in birmingham. Non-technical report to DfT, University of East Anglia, UK

  • Day B, Bateman I, Lake I (2007) Beyond implicit prices: recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model. Environ Resour Econ 37(1): 211–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekeland I, Heckman JJ, Nesheim L (2004) Identification and estimation of hedonic models. J Polit Econ 112(1): 60–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1996) Future noise policy—European Commission Green Paper. Report COM(96) 540 final, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium

  • European Commission (1998) White paper on fair pricing for transport infrastructure use

  • European Commission (2002) Environmental noise directive 2002/49/EG

  • Freeman AM (1974) Air pollution and property values: a further comment. Rev Econ Stat 56: 554–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman AM (2003) The measurement of environmental and resource values. Resources for the Future, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod GD, Scarpa R, Willis KG (2002) Estimating the benefits of traffic calming on through routes. J Transp Econ Policy 36(2): 211–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Haab TC, McDonnel KE (2003) Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson H, Nielsen H (1996) Road traffic noise—nordic prediction method. TemaNord 1996:525, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark. ISBN 92-9120-836-1

  • Kim CW, Phipps TT, Anselin L (2003) Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. J Environ Econ Manage 45: 24–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miedema HME, Oudshoorn CGM (2001) Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ Health Perspect 109(4): 409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navrud S (2004) The economic value of noise within the european union—a review and analysis of studies. Mimeo

  • Nelson JP (1982) Highway noise and property values: a survey of recent evidence. J Transp Econ Policy 16(2): 117–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson JP (2004) Meta-analysis of airport noise and hedonic property values. J Transp Econ Policy 38(1): 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen H (1996) Railway traffic noise—the nordic prediction method. TemaNord 1996:524, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark. ISBN 92-9120-837-X

  • Nijland HA, Van Kempen EEMM, Van Wee GP, Jabben J (2003) Costs and benefits of noise abatement measures. Transp Policy 10(2): 131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijland HA, Van Wee GP (2005) Traffic noise in europe: a comparison of calculation methods, noise indices and noise standards for road and railroad traffic in europe. Transp Rev 25(5): 591–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhrström E, Skånberg A, Barreård L, Svensson H, Ängerheim P (2005) Effects of simultaneous exposure to noise from road and railway traffic. Inter-Noise

  • Palmquist RB (2005) Handbook of environmental economics: valuing environmental changes, vol. 2 of handbooks in economics 20, Chapter property value models. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 763–819

  • Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 82(1): 34–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg U, Ejsmont JA (2002) Tyre/road noise reference book. Informex, Kisa, Sweden, ISBN 91-631-2610-9

  • SIKA (2008) Samhällsekonomiska kalkylprinciper och kalkylvärden för transportsektorn. SIKA PM 2008:3, SIKA (Swedish Institute for Transport and Communications Analysis), Stockholm, Sweden

  • Small KA, Steimetz S (2007) Spatial hedonics and the willingness to pay for residential Amenities. Working Papers 05-06-31, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics

  • Theebe MAJ (2004) Planes, trains and automobiles: the impact of traffic noise on house prices. J Real Estate Finance Econ 28(2/3): 209–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler W (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the detroit region. Econ Geogr 46: 234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmsson M (2000) The impact of traffic noise on the values of single-family houses. J Environ Plann Manage 43(6): 799–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Andersson.

Additional information

This study was funded by Banverket and Vägverket, and the financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

The authors are solely responsible for the results and views expressed in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, H., Jonsson, L. & Ögren, M. Property Prices and Exposure to Multiple Noise Sources: Hedonic Regression with Road and Railway Noise. Environ Resource Econ 45, 73–89 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9306-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9306-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation