Skip to main content
Log in

Coping with Preference Anomalies in Cost–Benefit Analysis: A Market-Simulation Approach

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodological strategy for cost–benefit analysis (CBA) which does not require the assumption that individuals’ preferences satisfy standard coherence conditions, and so renders CBA immune to the problems generated by preference anomalies. The proposal treats CBA as an exercise in market simulation, based on the measurement of surplus. Anomalies occur when surplus measurements vary according to the hypothetical payment mechanism used. In such cases, the mechanism that is the “closest market analogue” should be used. This approach is used to resolve problems associated with some familiar anomalies, including inconsistencies between “citizen” and “consumer” valuations, and endowment effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardsley, N. and R. Sugden (forthcoming), ‘Human nature and sociality in economics’, in S.-C. Kolm and J. Mercier Ythier, eds., The Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, Amsterdam: North Holland.

  • I. Bateman (2002) Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual Cheltenham Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Bateman A. Munro B. Rhodes C. Starmer R. Sugden (1997) ArticleTitle‘A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 479–505 Occurrence Handle10.1162/003355397555262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore (1999) ArticleTitle‘Why Experiment in Economics?’ Economic Journal 109 F16–F24 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0297.00399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Camerer (1989) ArticleTitle‘An Experimental Test of Several Generalized Utility Theories’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2 61–104 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00055711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Camerer (1995) Individual Decision Making J. H. Kagel A. E. Roth (Eds) Handbook of Experimental Economics Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Deaton J. Muellbauer (1980) Economics and Consumer Behavior Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Fehr S. Gächter (2000) ArticleTitle‘Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments’ American Economic Review 90 980–994 Occurrence Handle10.1257/aer.90.4.980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Gibbard (1973) ArticleTitle‘Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result’ Econometrica 41 587–602 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1914083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. M. Hanemann (1999) The Economic Theory of WTP and WTA I. Bateman K. Willis (Eds) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC and Developing Countries Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Hargreaves Heap (2002) Everybody is Talking About it: Intersubjectivity and the Television Industry E. Fullbrook (Eds) Intersubjectivity in Economics Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hey C. Orme (1994) ArticleTitle‘Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data’ Econometrica 62 1291–1326 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2951750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Hicks (1943) ArticleTitle‘The Four Consumer Surpluses’ Review of Economic Studies 8 108–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and R. Sugden (2005), ‘Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation’, Environmental & Resource Economics 32, 161--181 (this issue).

  • D. Kahneman J. Knetsch R. Thaler (1990) ArticleTitle‘Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem’ Journal of Political Economy 98 1325–1348 Occurrence Handle10.1086/261737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Kahneman A. Tversky (1979) ArticleTitle‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk’ Econometrica 47 263–291 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1914185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Kahneman C. Varey (1991) Notes on the Psychology of Utility J. Elster J. Roemer (Eds) Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being Cambridge University Press Cambridge 127–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, J. (2005), ‘Gains, Losses, and the USA–EPA Economic Analyses Guidelines: A Hazardous Product?’, Environmental & Resource Economics 32, 91--112 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • List, J. (2005), ‘Scientific Numerology, Preference Anomalies, and Environmental PolicyMaking’, Environmental & Resource Economics 32, 35--53 (this issue).

  • G. Loewenstein (1999) ArticleTitle‘Experimental Economics from the Viewpoint of Behavioural Economics’ Economic Journal 109 F25–F34 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0297.00400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Loewenstein D. Adler (1995) ArticleTitle‘A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes’ Economic Journal 105 929–937 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2235159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Loewenstein J. Elster (Eds) (1992) Choice over Time Russell Sage Foundation New York

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Looomes C. Starmer R. Sugden (2003) ArticleTitle‘Do Anomalies Disappear in Repeated Markets?’ Economic Journal 113 IssueID2003 C153–C166 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0297.00108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Munro R. Sugden (2003) ArticleTitle‘On the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 50 407–428 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00033-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Plott (1996) Rational Individual Behaviour in Markets and Social Choice Processes: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis K. J. Arrow E. Colombatto M. Perlman C. Schmidt (Eds) The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour Macmillan Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Shogren S. Cho C. Koo J. List C. Park P. Polo R. Wilhelmi (2001) ArticleTitle‘Auction Mechanisms and the Measurement of WTP and WTA’ Resource and Energy Economics 23 97–109 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0928-7655(00)00038-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Starmer (1999) ArticleTitle‘Experimental Economics: Hard Science or Wasteful Tinkering?’ Economic Journal 109 F5–F15 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0297.00398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Starmer R. Sugden (1989) ArticleTitle‘Violations of the Independence Axiom in Common Ratio Problems: An Experimental Test of Some Competing Hypotheses’ Annals of Operations Research 19 79–102 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02283515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Sugden (1999a) Public Goods and Contingent Valuation I. Bateman K. Willis (Eds) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC and Developing Countries Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sugden (1999b) Alternatives to the Neoclassical Theory of Choice I. Bateman K. Willis (Eds) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC and Developing Countries Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sugden (2003) Conceptual Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Minimalist Account A. Pearman P. Mackie J. Nellthorp (Eds) Transport Projects, Programmes and Policies: Evaluation Needs and Capabilities Aldershot Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sugden (2004) ArticleTitle‘The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences’ American Economic Review 94 1014–1033 Occurrence Handle10.1257/0002828042002714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Tversky D. Kahneman (1991) ArticleTitle‘Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 1039–1061 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2937956

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Sugden.

Additional information

JEL classifications: D61, D63, Q51

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sugden, R. Coping with Preference Anomalies in Cost–Benefit Analysis: A Market-Simulation Approach. Environ Resource Econ 32, 129–160 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6031-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6031-5

Key words

Navigation