Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conducting shorter VEP tests to estimate visual acuity via assessment of SNR

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The estimation of visual acuity (VA) via visual evoked potentials (VEP) is a valuable measure for all preverbal and non-verbal subjects whether adults or children. The aim of this study is to introduce a novel technique of VEP acquisition based on estimates of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and comparison to a predefined detection threshold. We aim to demonstrate the reduction in total study time without compromising the accuracy of the VEP-determined acuity estimate.

Methods

The VEP-determined acuity of twelve normal subjects was assessed via a spatial frequency (SF) sweep. A pattern reversal checkerboard stimulus utilised SFs ranging from 0.1 to 28 cycles per degree (cpd). Using linear extrapolation and Bland–Altman analysis, VEP-acquired acuity was compared to a conventional Snellen Acuity measurement. An SNR test, Fsp, assessed signal quality to determine the minimum amount of sweep data required for VEP-based VA estimation.

Results

VEP acuity estimates correlated strongly (r 2 = 0.91, SD = 0.06), leading to a VA limit via extrapolation. Bland–Altman analysis revealed agreement between tests is statistically valid (95 % CI −0.11 to 0.42 logMAR). The Fsp statistic indicated SFs 1.3–3.6 cpd yielded Fsp >3.1 within 15 s of acquisition with frequencies >3.6 cpd being sub-threshold. The Kruskal–Wallis statistic compared final Fsp values for SFs as groups, where F = 208.82 ranking each frequency, with frequencies >7.2 cpd ranking lowest.

Discussion

The Fsp as an SNR measurement shows that rapid, quality-driven clinical tests for VEP-based acuity estimates can be conducted without compromising accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Regan D (1977) Speedy assessment of visual acuity in amblyopia by the evoked potential method. Ophthalmologica 175:159–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayama K (1979) Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern reversal visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:703–713

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ridder WH (2004) Methods of visual acuity determination with the spatial frequency sweep visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol 109:239–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mackay AM, Bradnam MS, Hamilton R, Elliot AT, Dutton GN (2008) Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:438–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Norcia AM, Tyler CW (1985) Spatial frequency sweep VEP: visual acuity during the first year of life. Vision Res 25:1399–1408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Tormene AP, Vaegan (2010) ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials. Documenta Ophthalmologica 120:111–119

  7. Daniel C, Wood FS (1980) Fitting equations to data. Wiley-Interscience, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elberling C, Wahlgreen O (1985) Estimation of auditory brainstem response by means of bayesian inference. Scand Audiol 14:89–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Don M, Elberling C, Waring M (1984) Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 13:219–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Elberling C, Don M (1987) Detection functions for the human auditory brainstem response. Scand Audiol 16:89–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yadav NK, Almoqbel F, Head L, Irving EL, Leat SJ (2009) Threshold determination in sweep VEP and the effects of criterion. Doc Ophthalmol 119:109–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenassi E, Likar K, Stirn-Kranjc B, Brecel J (2008) VEP maturation and visual acuity in infants and preschool children. Doc Ophthalmol 117:111–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bach M, Wilke M, Wilhelm B, Zrenner E, Wilke R (2010) Basic quantitative assessment of visual performance in patients with very low vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:1255–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arai M, Katsumi O, Paranhos FR, Lopes De Faria JM, Hirose T (1997) Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:242–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Katsumi O, Arai M, Wajima R, Denno S, Hirose T (1996) Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs Snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus. Vision Res 36:903–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adoh TO, Woodhouse JM (1994) The Cardiff acuity test used for measuring visual acuity development in toddlers. Vision Res 34:555–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), University of Queensland (Approval No. 2009001430).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kartik K. Iyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iyer, K.K., Bradley, A.P. & Wilson, S.J. Conducting shorter VEP tests to estimate visual acuity via assessment of SNR. Doc Ophthalmol 126, 21–28 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9355-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9355-9

Keywords

Navigation