Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How Should We Report Endoscopic Results in Patient’s with Barrett’s Esophagus?

  • Review
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Barrett’s esophagus is the only known pre-cancerous lesion for esophageal adenocarcinoma and is diagnosed by high-definition white light endoscopy demonstrating a columnar-lined esophagus along with biopsy evidence of intestinal metaplasia. With accurate performance and reporting of the endoscopic procedure, an evidence-based management strategy can be developed for treatment of Barrett’s dysplasia. However, cross-sectional data demonstrate that there is still inconsistency among gastroenterologists in performance and reporting of endoscopic findings in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Here, we present an evidence-based review of how to report endoscopic findings in Barrett’s esophagus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharma P. Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2548–2556.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, Gerson LB. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:30–50. (quiz 51).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Skinner DB, Walther BC, Riddell RH, Schmidt HE, Lascone C, Demeester TR. Barrett’s esophagus. Comparison of benign and malignant cases. Ann Surg. 1983;198:554–565.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Spechler SJ, Zeroogian JM, Antonioli DA, Wang HH, Goyal RK, et al. Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Lancet. 1994;344:1533–1536.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung KW, Talley NJ, Romero Y, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of intestinal metaplasia of the gastroesophageal junction and Barrett’s esophagus: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1447–1455. (quiz 1456).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sikkema M, Looman CW, Steyerberg EW, et al. Predictors for neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1231–1238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman HG, Bhat SK, Murray LJ, et al. Symptoms and endoscopic features at Barrett’s esophagus diagnosis: implications for neoplastic progression risk. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:527–534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buttar NS, Wang KK, Sebo TJ, et al. Extent of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus correlates with risk of adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1630–1639.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Montgomery E, Bronner MP, Greenson JK, et al. Are ulcers a marker for invasive carcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus? Data from a diagnostic variability study with clinical follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:27–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters FP, Brakenhoff KP, Curvers WL, et al. Histologic evaluation of resection specimens obtained at 293 endoscopic resections in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:604–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tharavej C, Hagen JA, Peters JH, et al. Predictive factors of coexisting cancer in Barrett’s high-grade dysplasia. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:439–443.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma N, Srivastava S, Kern F, et al. Endoscopic modalities for the diagnosis of Barrett’s oesophagus. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4:733–740.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown J, Sharma P. From Prague to Seattle: improved endoscopic technique and reporting improves outcomes in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:4–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Visrodia K, Iyer PG, Schleck CD, et al. Yield of repeat endoscopy in Barrett’s esophagus with no dysplasia and low-grade dysplasia: a population-based study. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:158–167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh M, Gupta N, Gaddam S, et al. Practice patterns among U.S. gastroenterologists regarding endoscopic management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:689–695.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwon RS, Adler DG, Chand B, et al. High-resolution and high-magnification endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:399–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Canto MI, Anandasabapathy S, Brugge W, et al. In vivo endomicroscopy improves detection of Barrett’s esophagus-related neoplasia: a multicenter international randomized controlled trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:211–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma P, Hawes RH, Bansal A, et al. Standard endoscopy with random biopsies versus narrow band imaging targeted biopsies in Barrett’s oesophagus: a prospective, international, randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2013;62:15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2014;63:7–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, et al. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:e18-52. (quiz e13).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boyce HW. Endoscopic definitions of esophagogastric junction regional anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:586–592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi DW, Baek SJ, Ahn SH, et al. Endoscopically observed lower esophageal capillary patterns. Korean J Intern Med. 2002;17:245–248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1084–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wallner B. Endoscopically defined gastroesophageal junction coincides with the anatomical gastroesophageal junction. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2155–2158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ogiya K, Kawano T, Ito E, et al. Lower esophageal palisade vessels and the definition of Barrett’s esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:645–649.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Andrici J, Tio M, Cox MR, et al. Hiatal hernia and the risk of Barrett’s esophagus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:415–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson DA, Younes Z, Hogan WJ. Endoscopic assessment of hiatal hernia repair. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:650–659.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22:601–616.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Weusten B, Bisschops R, Coron E, et al. Endoscopic management of Barrett’s esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy. 2017;49:191–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gopal DV, Lieberman DA, Magaret N, et al. Risk factors for dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE): results from a multicenter consortium. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48:1537–1541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Menke-Pluymers MB, Hop WC, Dees J, et al. Risk factors for the development of an adenocarcinoma in columnar-lined (Barrett) esophagus. The Rotterdam Esophageal Tumor Study Group. Cancer. 1993;72:1155–1158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Anaparthy R, Gaddam S, Kanakadandi V, et al. Association between length of Barrett’s esophagus and risk of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in patients without dysplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1430–1436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma P, Morales TG, Bhattacharyya A, Garewal HS, Sampliner RE. Dysplasia in short-segment Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective 3-year follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:2012–2016.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Weston AP, Krmpotich PT, Cherian R, Dixon A, Topalosvki M. Prospective long-term endoscopic and histological follow-up of short segment Barrett’s esophagus: comparison with traditional long segment Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:407–413.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Conio M, Aste H, Bonelli L. “Short” Barrett’s esophagus: a condition not to be underestimated. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sharma P, Dent J, Armstrong D, et al. The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett’s esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1392–1399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Alvarez Herrero L, Curvers WL, Van Vilsteren FG, et al. Validation of the Prague C&M classification of Barrett’s esophagus in clinical practice. Endoscopy. 2013;45:876–882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vahabzadeh B, Seetharam AB, Cook MB, et al. Validation of the Prague C & M criteria for the endoscopic grading of Barrett’s esophagus by gastroenterology trainees: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:236–241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chang CY, Lee YC, Lee CT, et al. The application of Prague C and M criteria in the diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus in an ethnic Chinese population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee YC, Cook MB, Bhatia S, et al. Interobserver reliability in the endoscopic diagnosis and grading of Barrett’s esophagus: an Asian multi-national study. Endoscopy. 2010;42:699–704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gupta N, Gaddam S, Wani SB, et al. Longer inspection time is associated with increased detection of high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:531–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bisschops R, Areia M, Coron E, et al. Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4:629–656.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Enestvedt BK, Lugo R, Guarner-Argente C, et al. Location, location, location: does early cancer in Barrett’s esophagus have a preference? Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:462–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kariyawasam VC, Bourke MJ, Hourigan LF, et al. Circumferential location predicts the risk of high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma in short-segment Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:938–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cassani L, Sumner E, Slaughter JC, et al. Directional distribution of neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus is not influenced by distance from the gastroesophageal junction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:877–882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Axon A, Diebold MD, Fujino M, et al. Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005;37:570–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Prasad GA, Bansal A, Sharma P, et al. Predictors of progression in Barrett’s esophagus: current knowledge and future directions. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1490–1502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Pech O, Gossner L, Manner H, et al. Prospective evaluation of the macroscopic types and location of early Barrett’s neoplasia in 380 lesions. Endoscopy. 2007;39:588–593.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Abela JE, Going JJ, Mackenzie JF, et al. Systematic four-quadrant biopsy detects Barrett’s dysplasia in more patients than nonsystematic biopsy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:850–855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Levine DS, Blount PL, Rudolph RE, et al. Safety of a systematic endoscopic biopsy protocol in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1152–1157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Boerwinkel DF, Swager AF, Curvers WL, Bergman JJ. The clinical consequences of advanced imaging techniques in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:622–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gill RS, Singh R. Endoscopic imaging in Barrett’s esophagus: current practice and future applications. Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;25:89–95.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Wolfsen HC, Sharma P, Wallace MB, et al. Safety and feasibility of volumetric laser endomicroscopy in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:631–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. ASGE Technology Committee, Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations thresholds for adopting real-time imaging-assisted endoscopic targeted biopsy during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:684–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sharma P, Brill J, Canto M, et al. White paper AGA: advanced imaging in Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:2209–2218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chedgy FJQ, Subramaniam S, Kandiah K, et al. Acetic acid chromoendoscopy: improving neoplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:5753–5760.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Reaud S, Croue A, Boyer J. Diagnostic accuracy of magnifying chromoendoscopy with detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia using acetic acid in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2006;30:217–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mayinger B, Oezturk Y, Stolte M, et al. Evaluation of sensitivity and inter- and intra-observer variability in the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus with enhanced magnification endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:349–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yagi K, Nakamura A, Sekine A, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of mucosal adenocarcinomas and intestinal metaplasia of columnar-lined esophagus using enhanced-magnification endoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2006;18:S21–S26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Fortun PJ, Anagnostopoulos GK, Kaye P, et al. Acetic acid-enhanced magnification endoscopy in the diagnosis of specialized intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett’s oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:735–742.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Bhandari P, Kandaswamy P, Cowlishaw D, et al. Acetic acid-enhanced chromoendoscopy is more cost-effective than protocol-guided biopsies in a high-risk Barrett’s population. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25:386–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Longcroft–Wheaton G, Duku M, Mead R, et al. Acetic acid spray is an effective tool for the endoscopic detection of neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:843–847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Pohl J, May A, Rabenstein T, et al. Comparison of computed virtual chromoendoscopy and conventional chromoendoscopy with acetic acid for detection of neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy. 2007;39:594–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Vazquez-Iglesias JL, Alonso-Aguirre P, Diz-Lois MT, et al. Acetic acid allows effective selection of areas for obtaining biopsy samples in Barrett’s esophagus. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;19:187–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Pohl J, Pech O, May A, et al. Incidence of macroscopically occult neoplasias in Barrett’s esophagus: are random biopsies dispensable in the era of advanced endoscopic imaging? Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2350–2356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Coletta M, Sami SS, Nachiappan A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, Ragunath K. Acetic acid chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of early neoplasia and specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:57–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kandiah K, Chedgy FJQ, Subramaniam S, et al. International development and validation of a classification system for the identification of Barrett’s neoplasia using acetic acid chromoendoscopy: the Portsmouth acetic acid classification (PREDICT). Gut. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wani S, Sharma P. Narrow band imaging in Barrett’s esophagus. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;1:53–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wolfsen HC, Crook JE, Krishna M, et al. Prospective, controlled tandem endoscopy study of narrow band imaging for dysplasia detection in Barrett’s Esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:24–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Sharma P, Bergman JJ, Goda K, et al. Development and validation of a classification system to identify high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:591–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, 4801 Linwood Boulevard, Kansas City, MO, 64128, USA

    Venkata Subhash Gorrepati & Prateek Sharma

  2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mailstop 1023, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA

    Prateek Sharma

Authors
  1. Venkata Subhash Gorrepati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prateek Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prateek Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorrepati, V.S., Sharma, P. How Should We Report Endoscopic Results in Patient’s with Barrett’s Esophagus?. Dig Dis Sci 63, 2115–2121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5067-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5067-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation