Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection pre- and post-treatment is mandatory in the current era of decreasing prevalence and increasing antibiotic resistance. The diagnostic performance of most tests is poorer in clinical situations with low bacterial density which is seen in conditions such as atrophic gastritis or intake of antisecretory and antibiotic medications. Noninvasive tests require less cost and resource but provide excellent accuracy; however, endoscopy with testing of gastric biopsy specimens is indicated where alarming symptoms are present or antibiotic susceptibility testing by culture is desired. Newer modalities such as polymerase chain reaction testing provide additional virulence and antibiotic sensitivity profiling. This article outlines new developments and the key parameters of each test, as careful selection of test modality within the clinical context is required for adequate management of infected symptomatic patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tonkic A, Tonkic M, Lehours P, Mégraud F. Epidemiology and diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2012;17:1–8.
Malfertheiner P, Mégraud F, O’Morain CA, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection—the Maastricht IV/Florence consensus report. Gut. 2012;61:646–664.
Burucoa C, Delchier J-C, Courillon-Mallet A, et al. Comparative evaluation of 29 commercial Helicobacter pylori serological kits. Helicobacter. 2013;18:169–179.
Gisbert JP, Pajares JM. Review article: 13C-urea breath test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection—a critical review. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:1001–1017.
Ferwana M, Abdulmajeed I, Alhajiahmed A, et al. Accuracy of urea breath test in Helicobacter pylori infection: meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:1305–1314.
Leal YA, Flores LL, Fuentes-Pananá EM, Cedillo-Rivera R, Torres J. 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Helicobacter. 2011;16:327–337.
Perets TT, Shporn E, Boltin D, Dickman R, Niv Y. Stability of 13C-urea breath test samples over time in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Lab Anal. 2015. doi:10.1002/jcla.21841.
Koletzko S, Haisch M, Seeboth I, et al. Isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection with 13C-urea breath test. Lancet. 1995;345:961–962.
Braden B, Haisch M, Duan LP, Lembcke B, Caspary WF, Hering P. Clinically feasible stable isotope technique at a reasonable price: analysis of 13CO2/12CO2-abundance in breath samples with a new isotope selective-nondispersive infrared spectrometer. Z Gastroenterol. 1994;32:675–678.
Braden B, Teuber G, Dietrich CF, Caspary WF, Lembcke B. Comparison of new faecal antigen test with 13C-urea breath test for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection and monitoring eradication treatment: prospective clinical evaluation. Bmj. 2000;320:148.
Korkmaz H, Kesli R, Karabagli P, Terzi Y. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of five different stool antigen tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Helicobacter. 2013;18:384–391.
Korkmaz H, Findik D, Ugurluoglu C, Terzi Y. Reliability of stool antigen tests: investigation of the diagnostic value of a new immunochromatographic Helicobacter pylori approach in dyspeptic patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:657–660.
Gisbert JP, de la Morena F, Abraira V. Accuracy of monoclonal stool antigen test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1921–1930.
Marchildon PA, Sugiyama T, Fukuda Y, et al. Evaluation of the effects of strain-specific antigen variation on the accuracy of serologic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:1480–1485.
Yamada K, Sugiyama T, Mihara H, et al. Fragmented CagA protein is highly immunoreactive in Japanese patients. Helicobacter. 2012;17:187–192.
Leodolter A, Vaira D, Bazzoli F, et al. European multicentre validation trial of two new non-invasive tests for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antibodies: urine-based ELISA and rapid urine test. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18:927–931.
Hartman DJ, Owens SR. Are routine ancillary stains required to diagnose Helicobacter infection in gastric biopsy specimens? An institutional quality assurance review. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137:255–260.
Uotani T, Graham DY. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori using the rapid urease test. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3:9.
Osaki T, Mabe K, Hanawa T, Kamiya S. Urease-positive bacteria in the stomach induce a false-positive reaction in a urea breath test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:814–819.
Manes G, Zanetti MV, Piccirillo MM, Lombardi G, Balzano A, Pieramico O. Accuracy of a new monoclonal stool antigen test in post-eradication assessment of Helicobacter pylori infection: comparison with the polyclonal stool antigen test and urea breath test. Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37:751–755.
Graham DY, Klein PD, Evans DJ, et al. Campylobacter pylori detected noninvasively by the 13C-urea breath test. Lancet. 1987;1:1174–1177.
Allahverdiyev AM, Bagirova M, Caliskan R, et al. Isolation and diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori by a new method: Microcapillary culture. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:2622–2628.
Cellini L, Di Campli E, Di Bartolomeo S, Bessa LJ, Baffoni M, Di Giulio M. New transport medium for cultural recovery of Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:4325–4329.
Park SA, Ko A, Lee NG. Stimulation of growth of the human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori by atmospheric level of oxygen under high carbon dioxide tension. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:96.
Eshmuratov A, Nah JC, Kim N, et al. The correlation of endoscopic and histological diagnosis of gastric atrophy. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:1364–1375.
Yoo JY, Kim N, Park YS, et al. Detection rate of Helicobacter pylori against a background of atrophic gastritis and/or intestinal metaplasia. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:751–755.
Braden B. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. BMJ. 2012;344:e828.
Sánchez-Delgado J, Gené E, Suárez D, et al. Has H. pylori prevalence in bleeding peptic ulcer been underestimated? A meta-regression. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:398–405.
Choi YJ, Kim N, Lim J, et al. Accuracy of diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Helicobacter. 2012;17:77–85.
Kalach N, Gosset P, Dehecq E, et al. Usefulness of gastric biopsy-based real time-PCR for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;61:307–312.
Singh V, Mishra S, Rao GRK, et al. Evaluation of nested PCR in detection of Helicobacter pylori targeting a highly conserved gene: HSP60. Helicobacter. 2008;13:30–34.
Xiong LJ, Tong Y, Wang Z, Mao M. Detection of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori by stool PCR in children: a comprehensive review of literature. Helicobacter. 2013;18:89–101.
Anagnostopoulos GK, Yao K, Kaye P, et al. High-resolution magnification endoscopy can reliably identify normal gastric mucosa, Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis, and gastric atrophy. Endoscopy. 2007;39:202–207.
Yagi K, Nakamura A, Sekine A. Characteristic endoscopic and magnified endoscopic findings in the normal stomach without Helicobacter pylori infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:39–45.
Yagi K, Saka A, Nozawa Y, Nakamura A. Prediction of Helicobacter pylori status by conventional endoscopy, narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopy in stomach after endoscopic resection of gastric cancer. Helicobacter. 2014;19:111–115.
Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Burg J, et al. Diagnosing Helicobacter pylori in vivo by confocal laser endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:2119–2123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atkinson, N.S.S., Braden, B. Helicobacter Pylori Infection: Diagnostic Strategies in Primary Diagnosis and After Therapy. Dig Dis Sci 61, 19–24 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3877-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3877-4