Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of Colonoscopy in Elderly African-American Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Average-risk individuals should be offered a screening colonoscopy beginning at 50 years of age. However, there is no clear consensus on an age at which patients should no longer be offered a screening colonoscopy. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of colonoscopy in elderly individuals based on the preprocedure indication.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent colonoscopy at Howard University Hospital from Jan 1, 2001 to Dec 31, 2005. Patients older than age 75 years were then stratified into two groups: one group classified as average risk for colon cancer and a second group classified as higher risk for finding cancer based on indication. Significant findings from colonoscopy were assigned if the patient was found to have an advanced adenoma, such as villous attributes, high-grade dysplasia, adenoma ≥1 cm, or cancer. All others findings at colonoscopy were categorized as having nonsignificant findings.

Results

During this period, 922 elderly patients (75 years of age or older) underwent colonoscopy. Based on preprocedure indications, 606 patients were considered higher risk and 316 average risk. Among the preprocedure higher-risk patients, 532 had nonsignificant findings include hemorrhoids, diverticulosis, telangiectasias, lipomas, and inflammatory polyps. Among the preprocedure average-risk patients, 286 had nonsignificant findings. From the 110 patients who underwent screening colonoscopy, 99 patients had nonsignificant findings. Malignancy was found in 42 patients: 33 who had higher-risk indications and 9 who had average-risk indications.

Conclusion

Average-risk patients are less likely to have significant findings, including cancer, on colonoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davila RE, Rajan E, Baron TH, Adler DG, Egan JV, et al. ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:546–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen GC, Laveist TA, Gearhart S, Bayless TM, Brant SR. Racial and geographic variations in colectomy rates among hospitalized ulcerative colitis patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1507–1513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashktorab H, Begum R, Akhgar A, Smoot DT, Elbedawi M, et al. Folate status and risk of colorectal polyps in African Americans. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:1462–1470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashktorab H, Smoot DT, Farzanmehr H, Fidelia-Lambert M, Momen B, et al. Clinicopathological features and microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancers from African Americans. Int J Cancer. 2005;116:914–919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clegg LX, Li FP, Hankey BF, Chu K, Edwards BK. Cancer survival among US whites and minorities: a SEER (surveillance, epidemiology, and end results) program population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1985–1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Palis BE, Bentrem DJ, Talamonti MS, et al. Adequacy and importance of lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:247–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, et al. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:230–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiffman ML, Farrel MT, Yee YS. Risk of bleeding after endoscopic biopsy or polypectomy in patients taking aspirin or other NSAIDS. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:458–462.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectl cancer: U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:627–637.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stevens T, Burke CA. Colonoscopy screening in the elderly: when to stop? Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1881–1885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Karajeh MA, Sanders DS, Hurlstone DP. Colonoscopy in elderly people is a safe procedure with a high diagnostic yield: a prospective comparative study of 2000 patients. Endoscopy. 2006;38:226–230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pox C, Schmiegel W, Classen M. Current status of screening colonoscopy in Europe and in the United States. Endoscopy. 2007;39:168–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Duncan JE, Sweeney WB, Trudel JL, Madoff RD, Mellgren AF. Colonoscopy in the elderly: low risk, low yield in asymptomatic patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:646–651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Schembre DB, Ayub K, Gluck M, et al. Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients: prevalence of neoplasia and estimated impact on life expectancy. Jama. 2006;295:2357–2365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grant #CA102681, funded by the National Cancer Institute, NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Ashktorab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smoot, D.T., Collins, J., Dunlap, S. et al. Outcome of Colonoscopy in Elderly African-American Patients. Dig Dis Sci 54, 2484–2487 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-0965-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-0965-3

Keywords

Navigation