Abstract
The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the major target site of the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Whether endoscopic findings can predict the histological diagnosis and degree of severity in GVHD remains controversial. We investigated the degree of correlation between endoscopic and histological findings, and evaluated the impact of endoscopic examination on clinical decision in GVHD management. This study was conducted as a retrospective single-center study. One hundred and one patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and at the risk of GI GVHD were referred for endoscopic evaluation. Endoscopic images and histology were reviewed to diagnose and grade in a blind fashion, and the histological findings were used as the “gold standard” for diagnosis. Endoscopic findings revealed a significantly positive association with histological abnormalities of GVHD (odds ratio [OR] = 33.6, 95% CI 4.3–261.1), and the sensitivity and specificity were 98 and 44%, respectively. The kappa coefficient for agreement between the endoscopic and histological grading was 0.423 (p-value < 0.001). Ten (18%) patients out of 57 histology-negative cases were managed successfully as GVHD on the endoscopic finding. Though the overall reliability of endoscopic diagnosis in GVHD is still insufficient in terms of sensitivity and specificity, high-grade cases such as grades 3 or 4 showed specific endoscopic findings to draw a significant agreement with histological findings. Endoscopic examination can give critical information and impose a pivotal impact on clinical decision when the histology is discordant with clinical presentation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armitage JO (1994) Bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 330:827–838. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199403243301206
Wagner JE Jr, Vogelsang GB, Beschorner WE (1989) Pathogenesis and pathology of graft-vs.-host disease. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 11:196–212
Sullivan KM (1999) Graft-versus-host disease. In: Thomas ED, Blume KB, Forman SJ (eds) Hematopoietic cell transplantation, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 515–536
Flowers ME, Kansu E, Sullivan KM (1999) Pathophysiology and treatment of graft-versus-host disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 13:1091–1112. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8588(05)70111-8
Terdiman JP, Linker CA, Ries CA, Damon LE, Rugo HS, Ostroff JW (1996) The role of endoscopic evaluation in patients with suspected intestinal graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation. Endoscopy 28:680–685
Appleton AL, Sviland L, Pearson AD, Green MA, Eastham EJ, Malcolm AJ (1993) The need for endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 16:183–185. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199302000-00015
Nishida T, Hamaguchi M, Hirabayashi N, Haneda M, Terakura S, Atsuta Y, Imagama S, Kanie T, Murata M, Taji H, Suzuki R, Morishita Y, Kodera Y (2004) Intestinal thrombotic microangiopathy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: a clinical imitator of acute enteric graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 33:1143–1150. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704512
Zeigler ZR, Shadduck RK, Nemunaitis J, Andrews DF, Rosenfeld CS (1995) Bone marrow transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: a case series. Bone Marrow Transplant 15:247–253
Cox GJ, Matsui SM, Lo RS, Hinds M, Bowden RA, Hackman RC, Meyer WG, Mori M, Tarr PI, Oshiro LS, Ludert JE, Meyers JD, McDonald GB (1994) Etiology and outcome of diarrhea after marrow transplantation: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 107:1398–1407
Wu D, Hockenberry DM, Brentnall TA, Baehr PH, Ponec RJ, Kuver R, Tzung SP, Todaro JL, McDonald GB (1998) Persistent nausea and anorexia after marrow transplantation: a prospective study of 78 patients. Transplantation 66:1319–1324. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199811270-00010
Hackman RC, Wolford JL, Gleaves CA, Myerson D, Beauchamp MD, Meyers JD, McDonald GB (1994) Recognition and rapid diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus infection in marrow transplant recipients. A comparison of seven virologic methods. Transplantation 57:231–237. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199401001-00014
Cruz-Correa M, Poonawala A, Abraham SC, Wu TT, Zahurak M, Vogelsang G, Kalloo AN, Lee LA (2002) Endoscopic findings predict the histologic diagnosis in gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Endoscopy 34:808–813. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34257
Ponec RJ, Hackman RC, McDonald GB (1999) Endoscopic and histologic diagnosis of intestinal graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation. Gastrointest Endosc 49:612–621. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70390-1
Snover DC, Weisdorf SA, Vercellotti GM, Rank B, Hutton S, McGlave P (1985) A histopathologic study of gastric and small intestinal graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Human Pathol 16:387–392. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(85)80232-X
McDonald GB, Sale GE (1984) The human gastrointestinal tract after allogeneic marrow transplantation In: Sale GI, Shulman HM (eds) The pathology of bone marrow transplantation. Masson, New York, p 83
McDonald GB, Shulman HM, Sullivan KM, Spencer GD (1986) Intestinal and hepatic complications of human bone marrow transplantation. Part I. Gastroenterology 90:460–477
Nydegger A, Catto-Smith AG, Tiedemann K, Hardikar W (2007) Diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease—is rectal biopsy enough? Pediatr Blood Cancer 48:561–566. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20924
Thompson B, Salzman D, Steinhauer J, Lazenby AJ, Wilcox CM (2006) Prospective endoscopic evaluation for gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: determination of the best diagnostic approach. Bone Marrow Transplant 38:371–376. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705453
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheung, D.Y., Kim, J.I., Kim, S.S. et al. Endoscopic Evaluation in Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Comparisons with Histological Findings. Dig Dis Sci 53, 2947–2954 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0262-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0262-6