Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The emergence of contemporary criminology: an oral history of its development as an independent profession

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Criminology, as an independent academic pursuit, has maturated to the point where it is now interested in exploring its genealogy. Larger soio-political developments evidenced a pattern of influence in terms of promoting ideas and building the field’s infrastructure. The field’s growth from its early professionalization is documented here through an analysis of oral histories offered by seventeen influential scholars. Respondents explained their respective journeys to the field via three avenues: biographical, intellectual, and through the graduate school experience. Four scholars spoke to the emotive elements that attracted them to the field. The remainder sought answers to nagging questions on either empirical or theoretical matters. Lastly, the semi-structured interviews elicited accounts of their respective graduate school curricula and the role of mentoring. The essential lesson to be drawn from the collective experience is that the graduate school experience should include exposure to the broader liberal tradition and on the history of the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the sake of brevity, “Criminology” is used throughout as an omnibus term to account for the study of theories of criminal behavior and the administration of justice (ie Criminal Justice).

  2. The breakdown of the eight declines was as follows. Four dropped correspondence on either the mailed invitation (1) or the email overture (3). Three declined via email responses, generally citing personal reasons. One potential interviewee was approached on the author’s behalf by a respondents and communicated a demurral via that contact.

References

  1. Gans, H. (1992). Sociological amnesia: the noncumulation of normal social science. Sociological Forum, 7(4), 701–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abbott, A. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Savelsberg, J. J., King, R. D., & Cleveland, L. L. (2002). Politicized scholarship? Science on crime and the state. Social Problems, 49(3), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ben-David, J., & Collins, R. (1966). Social factors in the origins of a new science: the case of psychology. American Sociological Review, 31(4), 451–465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaziano, E. (1996). Ecological metaphors as scientific boundary work: Innovation and authority in interwar sociology and biology. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4), 874–907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akers, R. L. (1992). Linking sociology and its specialties: the case of criminology. Social Forces, 71(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaschik, S. (2013). Sociology vs. criminology. Inside Higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/06/18/discipline Retrieved July 23, 2013.

  11. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). The challenge of crime in a free society. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clear, T. (2001). Has academic criminal justice come of age? Justice Quarterly, 18(4), 709–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bursik, R. (2009). The dead sea scrolls and criminological knowledge: 2008 presidential address to the American society of criminology. Criminology, 47(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rafter, N. (2010). Science and memory in criminology: the American Society of Criminology 2009 Sutherland Address. Criminology, 48(2), 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibson, M. (1998). Biology or environment? Race and southern “deviancy” in the writings of Italian criminologists, 1880–1920. In J. Schneider (Ed.), Italy’s southern question: Orientalism in one Country (pp. 99–115). Oxford, England: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wetzell, R. F. (2000). Inventing the criminal: a history of German criminology, 1880–1945. UNC Press.

  17. Beirne, P. (1993). Inventing criminology: essays on the rise of ‘homo criminalis’. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garland, D. (1985). British criminology before 1935. The British Journal of Criminology, 28(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Becker, P., & Wetzell, R. F. (Eds.). (2006). Criminals and their scientists: the history of criminology in international perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Laub, J. (2002). A century of delinquency research and delinquency theory. In F. E. Zimring, D. S. Tanenhaus, & B. Dohrn (Eds.), A century of juvenile justice (pp. 179–205). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hirschi, T., & Rudisill, D. (1976). The great American search: Causes of crime 1876–1976. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 423(1), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rafter, N. (2007). Somatotyping, antimodernism, and the production of criminological knowledge. Criminology, 45(4), 805–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rafter, N. (2008). The criminal brain: understanding biological theories of crime. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rafter, N. (2008). Criminology’s darkest hour: Biocriminology in Nazi Germany. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41(2), 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gibson, M. (2002). Born to Crime: Cesare Lombroso and the origins of biological criminology. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cullen, F. T., Wright, J. P., & Blevins, K. R. (Eds.). (2006). Taking stock: the status of criminological theory. Advances in Criminological Theory, vol. 15.. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., Myer, A. J., & Adler, F. (Eds.). (2011). The origins of American criminology, vol. 16. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laub, J. (1983). Criminology in the making: an oral history. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cavendar, G. (1993). Doing theory: an interview with Albert K. Cohen. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 18(1), 100–18.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cavendar, G. (1995). We matter: The lives of girls and women: An interview with Meda Chesney-Lind. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 19(2), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Laub, J. (2002). Introduction: the life and work of Travis Hirschi. In J. H. Laub (Ed.), The craft of criminology: selected papers of Travis Hirschi. Transaction: New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cavendar, G. (1996). I tried to change the world: An interview with Coramae Richey Mann. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(2), 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cullen, F. T., & Messner, S. F. (2007). The making of criminology revisited: an oral history of Merton’s anomie paradigm. Theoretical Criminology, 11(1), 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cavendar, G. (1994). Social ambiguities: an interview with Jerome H. Skolnick. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 19(1), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Adler, F. (2002). Reflections on a scholarly career: an interview with Marvin Wolfgang. In B. Cohen, R. A. Silverman, & T. P. Thornberry (Eds.), Criminology at the millennium (pp. 1–13). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Bursik, R. (1998). A premature encapsulation. The Criminologist, 13(5), 1, 6–8, 10, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chambliss, W. (1987). I wish I didn’t know now what I didn’t know then. The Criminologist, 12(6), 1, 5–7, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Geis, G., & Dodge, M. (Eds.). (2002). Lessons of criminology. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Savelsberg, J. J. (2007). Between worlds: Marginalities, comparisons, sociology. In M. Deflem (Ed.), Sociologists in a global age: biographical perspectives (pp. 49–64). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Short, J. F., Jr. (1969). A natural history of one sociological career. In I. L. Horowitz (Ed.), Sociological self-images: a collective portrait. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Savelsberg, J., & Flood, S. (2011). Criminology meets Collins: global theory of intellectual change and a policy-oriented field. Sociological Forum, 26(1), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Terkel, S. (1970). Hard times: an oral history of the great depression. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Terkel, S. (1984). The good war: an oral history of world war two. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Terkel, S. (1992). Race: How blacks and whites think and feel about the American obsession. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bennett, J. (1981). Oral history and delinquency: the rhetoric of criminology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shaw, C. R. (1930). The jack-roller: A delinquent boy’s own story. Philadelphia, PA: Albert Sarfer.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Shaw, C. R. (1931). The natural history of a delinquent career. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2007). Changes in scholarly influence in major American criminology and criminal justice journals between 1986 and 2000. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18(1), 6–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hagan, J. (2001). Northern passage: American Vietnam war resisters in Canada. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Adler, F. (1975). Sisters in crime. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cohen, L. E., & Vila, B. K. (1996). Self-control and social control: An exposition of the Gottfredson-Hirschi/Sampson-Laub debate. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 5(2), 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Deegan, M. J. (1988). Jane addams and the men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Schulz, K. (2010). Being wrong: adventures in the margin of error. London: Portobello Books.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Justice, Law and Criminology, American University, Ward 270, 4400 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20016, USA

    Brendan D. Dooley

Authors
  1. Brendan D. Dooley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan D. Dooley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dooley, B.D. The emergence of contemporary criminology: an oral history of its development as an independent profession. Crime Law Soc Change 66, 339–357 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9630-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9630-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation