Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Humanising Imprisonment: A European project?

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the continued significance of human rights in the movement to develop a more comprehensive European framework to improve prison conditions. It identifies the immediate factors that underlie the movement as the successful implementation of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment; the growing number of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights applying the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to prison matters; the expansion of the number of member states of the Council of Europe; and the increased political interest at European level in penological matters. Attention is also paid to the wider ideological role that a concern for human rights plays in European criminal justice politics. The paper illustrates the reform movement by focussing on recent recommendations of the Council of Europe on various aspects of imprisonment, including the new European Prison Rules. The possible emergence of an international instrument of treaty status that would deal directly with substantive conditions of imprisonment is noted and its potential impact considered. An argument is made for the systemisation of European prison law and for further reform initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association for the Prevention of Torture (2004). Optional protocol – A manual for prevention. Geneva: Association for the Prevention of Torture/ Inter-American Institute of Human Rights.

  • Bassiouni, M. C. (1993). Human rights in the context of criminal justice: Identifying international procedural protections and the equivalent protections in national constitutions. Duke J Comparat Int Law, 3, 263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, W. (1972). The standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners. Am J Int Law, 66, 232–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (1987). The European prison rules. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (2004). Report of the Eleventh Ordinary Sitting of the Parliamentary Assembly of Tuesday 27 April 2004. Retrieved September 30, 2005, from http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=http://assembly.coe.int/documents/records/2004–2/e/0404271500e.htm .

  • Council of Europe (2005). Resolution No.4 of the European Ministers of Justice adopted at the 26th Conference of European Ministers of Justice, Helsinki, 7–8 April 2005 (MJU-26 (2005) Resol. 4 Final). Retrieved September 30, 2005, Full text available at http://www.coe.int/T/E/Legal_affairs/Legal_co-operation/Conferences_and_high-level_meetings/European_Ministers_of_Justice/MJU-26%282005%29Res4E.asp#TopOfPage.

  • European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (2001) 11th General Report on the CPTs Activities covering the period 1 January to 31 December 2000. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

  • European Union. (2002). Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States. OJ L 190, Vol. 45. 18.07.2002.

  • Giménez-Salinas i Colomer, E. (1991). Spain. In D. van Zyl Smit & F. Dünkel (Eds.), Imprisonment today and tomorrow international perspectives on prisoners’ rights and prison conditions (pp. 455). Deventer: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunau, T., & Tiesler, E. (1982). Heymans Taschenkommentare:Strafvollzugsgesetz. Köln: Carl Heymans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerner, H-J. (2004). Empfehlungen des Europarates zum Freiheitsentzug 1962–2003. Bad Godesberg: Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, L. (2004). Contrasting prisoners’ rights: A comparative examination of England and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2004). Prisons and their moral performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2000). Prisoners’ rights in the context of the European convention on human rights. Punishment and Society, 2, 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2000). International controls on sentencing and punishment. In M. Tonry & R. Frase (Eds.), Sentencing and sanctioning in Western countries (pp. 379–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2001). Developing prison standards compared. Punishment and Society, 2, 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodley, N. S. (1999). The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law (2 ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standa-Kawecka, B. (2001). Poland. In D. van Zyl Smit & F. Dünkel (Eds.), Imprisonment Today and Tomorrow International Perspectives on Prisoners’ Rights and Prison Conditions (2 edn). The Hague: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snacken, S. (2005). Bestraffing, vrijheidsberoving en mensenrechten. Een reductionistisch strafbeleid in mensenrechtelijk perspectief. In Brems, E., Sottiaux, S., Vanden Heede, P., Vandenhole, W. (Eds.), Vrijheden en vrijheidsbeneming. Mensenrechten van gedetineerden (pp. 323–353). Antwerp Oxford: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1992). Human Rights Committee, General Comment 20, Article 7, (Forty-fourth session, 1992), Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, U.N. Doc. HRI\GEN\1\Rev.l at 30 (1994).

  • Walmsley, R. (2005). World Prison Population List (6 edn). London: International Centre of Prison Studies.

  • Walmsley, R. (2001). World Prison Populations –An attempt at a complete list. In D. van Zyl Smit & F. Dünkel (Eds), Imprisonment Today and Tomorrow International Perspectives on Prisoners’ Rights and Prison Conditions (2 edn). The Hague: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E. (2003). The contradictions of American capital punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Cases

  • BGE (1976) 102 1a 279 (Switzerland).

  • BVerfGE 45 187 (Federal Republic of Germany).

  • Corte constituzionale della Repubblica Italiana, Corte cost. Sentenza, 27 September 1983, nr 274, Foro Italia 1, 2333 (Italy).

  • Cour de Cassation de France, Décision nr. 93–334 DC of January 20, 1994 (France).

  • G.B. v. Bulgaria, no. 42346/98, 11 March 2004 (ECtHR).

  • Hirst v. United Kingdom, no. 74025/01, 30 March 2004 (ECtHR).

  • Iorgov v. Bulgaria, no. 40653/98, 11 March 2004 (ECtHR).

  • Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, 15 July 2002 (ECtHR).

  • Messina v. Italy (no.2), no. 25498/94, 20 September 2000 (ECtHR).

  • Minister of Home Affairs v. National Institute for Crime Prevention and the Reintegration of Offenders and others 2004 (5) BCLR 445 (CC) (South Africa).

  • Napier v. The Scottish Ministers 2004 SLT 555 (Scotland).

  • R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hindley [2000] 2 All ER 385 (HL) (England).

  • Sauvé v. Canada 2002 SCC 68.

  • Stafford v. United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 83, ECHR 2002–V.

  • Van der Ven v. The Netherlands, no. 50901/99, § 63, ECHR 2003–II.

  • Weeks v. United Kingdom, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 144.

International Instruments

  • Council of Europe. (1983). Council of Europe Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons. ETS No. 112.

  • Council of Europe. (2006) Recommendation (2006)2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the European Prison Rules. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 January 2006 at the 952nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

  • Council of Europe. (2003). Recommendation (2003)23 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the Management by Prison Administrations of Life Sentence and other Long-term Prisoners. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 October 2003 at the 855th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

  • Council of Europe. (2003a). Recommendation (2003)22 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Conditional Release (parole). Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 24 September 2003 at the 853rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

  • Council of Europe. (1998). Recommendation No. R (98) 7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning the Ethical and Organisational Aspects of Health Care in Prison. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 April 1998 at the 627th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

  • Council of Europe. (1989). Recommendation No. R (89) 12 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Education in Prison. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 October 1989 at the 429th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

  • European Union. (2004). European Parliament Recommendation to the Council on the rights of prisoners in the European Union (2003/2188 (INI)) adopted on 9 March 2004. OJ C 102E Vol. 47. 28.4.2004.

  • United Nations. (2002). Optional Protocol to the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment G.A. Res 57/199. U.N. GAOR, 57th Session, U.N. Doc. A/RES/57/199.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk van Zyl Smit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Zyl Smit, D. Humanising Imprisonment: A European project?. Eur J Crim Policy Res 12, 107–120 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-006-9010-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-006-9010-7

Key words

Navigation