Skip to main content
Log in

Research Setting Versus Clinic Setting: Which Produces Better Outcomes in Cognitive Therapy for Depression?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare the outcomes of cognitive therapy for depression under controlled and clinically representative conditions, while holding several therapist and clinical assessment factors constant. Treatment outcomes for a sample of 23 adults with a primary diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder who received cognitive therapy in an outpatient clinic were compared with outcomes of 18 clients who were treated in the cognitive therapy condition of a large, multi-site randomized clinical trial of treatments for depression. All participants had been treated by one of two therapists who served as clinicians in both settings. Individuals in the two samples were diagnostically and demographically similar (approximately 50 % Female, 83 % White). A variety of client characteristics, assessed prior to treatment, as well as the outcomes of treatment, were examined. Significantly superior treatment outcomes were observed in the individuals treated in the research study, relative to clients in the outpatient clinic, and the difference was not accounted for by intake characteristics. Individuals treated by the therapists in the RCT experienced almost three times as much improvement in depressive symptoms as clients seen in the outpatient setting. If replicated, the findings suggest that differences exist between treatment outcomes in research and outpatient settings and that these differences may not simply be due to therapist experience and training, or differences in patient populations. Future research should further examine the impact of fidelity monitoring, treatment expectation and motivation, and the duration and timing of treatment protocols on clinical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, A. T. (2005). The current state of cognitive therapy: A 40-year retrospective. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 953–959. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Freeman, A. (1990). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R.-A., Ball, R., & Ranieri, W. F. (1996). Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 588–597. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Amsterdam, J. D., Shelton, R. C., Young, P. R., Salomon, R. M., et al. (2005). Cognitive therapy vs. medications in the treatment of moderate to severe depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(4), 409–416. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dozois, D., Dobson, K., & Ahnberg, J. (1998). A psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychological Assessment, 10, 83–89. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, I., Shea, M. T., Watkins, J. T., Imber, S. D., Sotsky, S. M., Collins, J. F., et al. (1989). NIMH treatment of depression collaborative research program: General effectiveness of treatments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 971–982. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110013002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., & Gibbon, M. (2004). The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID-I) and the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II disorders (SCID-II). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E. S., Wright, J. H., Jarrett, R. B., & Thase, M. E. (2006). Combining cognitive therapy and medication for mood disorders. Psychiatric Annals, 36, 320–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, C. J., Fournier, J. C., Stirman, S. W., DeRubeis, R. J., Crits-Christoph, P., & Beck, A. T. (2010). The clinical effectiveness of cognitive therapy for depression in an outpatient clinic. Journal of Affective Disorders, 125(1–3), 169–176. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.12.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, S. D., DeRubeis, R. J., Evans, M. D., Wiemer, M. J., Garvey, M. J., Grove, W. M., et al. (1992). Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression: Singly and in combination. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 774–781. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100018004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsley, J., & Lee, C. M. (2007). Research-informed benchmarks for psychological treatments: Efficacy studies, effectiveness studies, and beyond. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(1), 21–33. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.1.21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Roberts, L. J., Berns, S. B., & McGlinchey, J. B. (1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application, and alternatives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 300–307. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146–159. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. (2007). Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychotherapy Research, 17(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/10503300601032506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1223–1232. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. E., Simons, A. D., Wetzel, R. D., & Lustman, P. J. (1984). Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 33–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, C. F., & Beck, J. S. (2008). Selecting, training, and supervising therapists in randomized controlled trials. In A. M. Nezu & C. M. Nezu (Eds.), Evidence-based outcome research: A practical guide to conducting randomized controlled trials for psychosocial interventions (pp. 245–262). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perepletchikova, F., Treat, T. A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Treatment integrity in psychotherapy research: Analysis of the studies and examination of the associated factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 829–841. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S., Stiles, W. B., Barkham, M., Shapiro, D. A., Hardy, G. E., & Rees, A. (1996). Acceleration of changes in session impact during contrasting time-limited psychotherapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(3), 577–586. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.3.577.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Matt, G. E., Navarro, A. M., & Phillips, G. (2000). The effects of psychological therapies under clinically representative conditions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 512–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.512.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. E., & Chambless, D. L. (2009). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders in clinical practice: A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 595–606. doi:10.1037/a0016032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strunk, D. R., Brotman, M. A., DeRubeis, R. J., & Hollon, S. D. (2010). Therapist competence in cognitive therapy for depression: Predicting subsequent symptom change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(3), 429–437. doi:10.1037/a0019631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strunk, D. R., Cooper, A. A., Ryan, E. T., DeRubeis, R. J., & Hollon, S. D. (2012). The process of change in cognitive therapy for depression when combined with antidepressant medication: Predictors of early intersession symptom gains. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,. doi:10.1037/a0029281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, J. R., Jensen-Doss, A., & Hawley, K. M. (2006). Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons. American Psychologist, 61(7), 671–689. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, D., & Kirk, J. (2005). The clinical effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy: Outcome for a large sample of adults treated in routine practice. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(10), 1243–1260. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.09.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research and manuscript preparation was supported by grants MH47383 (Dr. Beck), K99/R00MH080100 (Dr. Stirman) and MH50129 (R10) (Dr. DeRubeis) and MH55875 (R10) from the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD and by grant R49/CCR316866 (Dr. Beck) by the Center for Disease Control.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shannon Wiltsey Stirman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibbons, C.R., Wiltsey Stirman, S., DeRubeis, R.J. et al. Research Setting Versus Clinic Setting: Which Produces Better Outcomes in Cognitive Therapy for Depression?. Cogn Ther Res 37, 605–612 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9499-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9499-7

Keywords

Navigation