Skip to main content
Log in

Is There a Core Process Across Depression and Anxiety?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is emerging evidence of overlap across cognitive processes. One explanation of this overlap is the presence of a single, higher-order latent process. In this study we tested for a core process and its ability to account for symptoms of depression and anxiety. Using Structural Equation Modeling we compared a model where processes (worry, thought suppression and experiential avoidance) are treated as separate predictors of symptoms (anxiety and depression) against a model where they are represented by one latent factor. These models were applied in three analyses: a cross-sectional student sample; a longitudinal subset of this analogue sample; and a cross-sectional sample of individuals with long-term health conditions. Comparison of the models showed that while the two sets of models provided comparable fits to the data, the single factor models provided a more parsimonious solution. In addition, the latent factor explained a large proportion of variance in all measured processes, suggesting a high degree of overlap between them. It also explained more variance in symptoms than the processes separately. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis further supported a single factor solution, and the item loadings indicated that the core process represented a perceived inability to control negative thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We also conducted the analyses in Fig. 1 after removing problematic items from the AAQ. This had little effect on the results of the analyses [Separate process: X2 (6) = 9.82, n.s,, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = .05 (CI90 = .00, lower, .11, upper); Common Factor: X2 (8) = 12.85, n.s,, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = .05 (CI90 = .00, lower, .10, upper); Chi-square change (2) = 3.08, n.s.]. We therefore only present the results of analyses using the complete scale.

  2. We also tested this model separately for depression [X2 (2) = 4.29, n.s,, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .07 (CI90 = .00, lower, .17, upper)] anxiety [X2 (2) = 3.60, n.s,, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .06 (CI90 = .00, lower, .16, upper)], and stress [X2 (2) = 5.46, n.s,, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .09 (CI90 = .00, lower, .18, upper)], all of which showed moderate to good fit. In all three models the common factor was a significant predictor of the outcome (B depression = .46, p < .001; B anxiety = .46, p < .001; B stress = .46, p < .001).

  3. We also conducted the analyses in Fig. 2 after removing problematic items from the AAQ. This had little effect on the results of the analyses [Separate process: X2 (6) = 15.61, p < .05, CFI = .97, RMSEA = .13 (CI90 = .05, lower, .21, upper); Common Factor: X2 (8) = 16.80, p < .05, CFI = .97, RMSEA = .11 (CI90 = .03, lower, .18, upper); Chi-square change (2) = 1.19, n.s.]. We therefore only present the results of analyses using the complete scale.

  4. We also tested this model separately for depression [X2 (2) = 1.65, n.s,, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = .00 (CI90 = .00, lower, .19, upper)] anxiety [X2 (2) = .96, n.s,, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = .00 (CI90 = .00, lower, .16, upper)], and stress [X2 (2) = 1.11, n.s,, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = .00 (CI90 = .00, lower, .17, upper)], all of which showed moderate to good fit. In all three models the common factor was a significant predictor of the outcome (B depression = .34, p < .001; B anxiety = .50 p < .001; B stress = .37, p < .001).

  5. We also conducted the analyses in Fig. 4 after removing problematic items from the AAQ. This had little effect on the results of the analyses [Separate process: X2 (2) = 6.61, p < .05, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .11 (CI90 = .02, lower, .21, upper); Common Factor: X2 (4) = 11.23, p < .05, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .10 (CI90 = .03, lower, .17, upper); Chi-square change (2) = 4.62, n.s.]. We therefore only present the results of analyses using the complete scale.

  6. The common factor models were also separately for depression [X2 (2) = 4.56, n.s,, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .08 (CI90 = .00, lower, .19, upper)] and anxiety [X2 (2) = 5.47, n.s,, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .10 (CI90 = .00, lower, .20, upper)], both of which showed moderate to good fit. In both models the common factor was a significant predictor of the outcome (B depression = .63, p < .001; B anxiety = .83, p < .001).

References

  • Aldao, A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2010). Specificity of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: A transdiagnostic examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 974–983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. J., Freedland, K. E., Clouse, R. E., & Lustman, P. J. (2001). The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care, 24, 1069–1078.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., Allen, L. B., & Choate, M. L. (2004). Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders. Behavior Therapy, 35, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., Ellard, K. K., Fairholme, C. P., Farchione, T. J., Boisseau, C. L., & Ehrenreich May, J. T. (2011). Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Crudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modelling with EQS and EQS/windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, T. A., Carey, M., Mullan, R. J., Spratt, C. G., & Spratt, M. B. (2009). Assessing the statistical and personal significance of the method of levels. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 311–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, T. A., & Mullan, R. J. (2007). Patients taking the lead. A naturalistic investigation of a patient-led approach to treatment in primary care. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 20, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, T. A., & Mullan, R. J. (2008). Evaluating the method of levels. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 21, 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi, S. K. (1991). Clinical irrelevance of HAD factor structure. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 461–470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. N., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). Cognitive inflexibility among ruminators and nonruminators. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 699–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, C., Coventry, P., Khara, A., Bower, P., Mansell, W., & Bakerly, N. D. (2012). Perseverative negative cognitive processes are associated with depression in people with long-term conditions. Chronic Illness, 8, 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, C., McGowan, L., Clark-Carter, D., & Creed, F. (2002). Depression in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 52–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, C., Percival, C., McGowan, L., Douglas, J., Tomenson, B., Cotter, L., et al. (2004). The risk factors for depression in first myocardial infarction patients. Psychological Medicine, 34, 1083–1092.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehring, T., & Watkins, E. R. (2008). Repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic process. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 1, 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., Doll, H. A., O’Connor, M. E., Bohn, K., Hawker, D. M., et al. (2009). Transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with eating disorders: A two-site trial with 60-week follow-up. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 311–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., & Shafran, R. (2003). Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders: A “transdiagnostic” theory and treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 509–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. P., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2008). Shared and unique cognitive factors in social anxiety. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 1, 206–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frasure-Smith, N., Lespérance, F., Prince, R. H., Verrier, P., Garber, R. A., Juneau, M., et al. (1997). Randomised trial of home-based psychosocial nursing intervention for patients recovering from myocardial infarction. The Lancet, 350, 473–479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garety, P. A., Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., Freeman, D., & Bebbington, P. E. (2001). A cognitive model of the positive symptoms of psychosis. Psychological Medicine, 31, 189–195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garver, M. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1999). Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modelling to test for construct validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20, 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavard, J. A., Lustman, P. J., & Clouse, R. E. (1993). Prevalence of depression in adults with diabetes. An epidemiological evaluation. Diabetes Care, 16, 1167–1178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P., & Irons, C. (2004). A pilot exploration of the use of compassionate images in a group of self-critical people. Memory, 12, 507–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. G., Watkins, E., Mansell, W., & Shafran, R. (2004). Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: A transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., et al. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Strosahl, K., Gifford, E. V., & Follette, V. M. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152–1168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. B. (1965). The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58, 295–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoelter, D. R. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Fang, A., & Asnaani, A. (2012). Emotion dysregulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 29, 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E. (1990). Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: Review and a conceptual model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 156–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katon, W., Lin, E. H. B., & Kroenke, K. (2007). The association of depression and anxiety with medical symptom burden in patients with chronic medical illness. General Hospital Psychiatry, 29, 147–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lespérance, F., Frasure-Smith, N., Koszycki, D., Laliberté, M.-A., van Zyl, L. T., Baker, B., et al. (2007). Effects of citalopram and interpersonal psychotherapy on depression in patients with coronary artery disease. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 297, 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linville, P. (1996). Attention inhibition: Does it underlie ruminative thought? In Ruminative thoughts (pp. 121–133). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  • Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1993). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS). Kensington: University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustman, P. J., Griffith, L. S., Clouse, R. E., & Cryer, P. E. (1986). Psychiatric illness in diabetes mellitus: Relationship to symptoms and glucose control. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 736–742.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, C., Nixon, D., & Coren, A. (2006). Long term conditions and depression: Considerations for best practice in practice based commissioning. National Institute for Mental Health in England, Care Services Improvement Partnership. London: Department of Health.

  • Mansell, W. (2005). Control theory and psychopathology: An integrative approach. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78, 141–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, W. (2008). The seven Cs of CBT: A consideration of the future challenges for cognitive behavioural therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 641–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, W., Harvey, A., Watkins, E. R., & Shafran, R. (2008). Cognitive behavioral processes across psychological disorders: A review of the utility and validity of the transdiagnostic approach. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 1, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, W., Harvey, A., Watkins, E., & Shafran, R. (2009). Conceptual foundations of the transdiagnostic approach to CBT. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, R. K., Murray, H. W., & Barlow, D. H. (2009). Balancing fidelity and adaptation in the dissemination of empirically-supported treatments: The promise of transdiagnostic interventions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 946–953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, F., Clark, D. M., Grey, N., Wild, J., Hirsch, C., Fennell, M., et al. (2009). A demonstration of the efficacy of two of the components of cognitive therapy for social phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 496–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, F., Shafran, R., & Cooper, S. (2010). What does a transdiagnostic approach have to offer the treatment of anxiety disorders? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 491–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (1991). Longitudinal research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennin, D. S., Holoway, R. M., Fresco, D. M., Moore, M. T., & Heimberg, R. G. (2007). Delineating components of emotion and its dysregulation in anxiety and mood psychopathology. Behaviour Therapy, 38, 284–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State worry questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moussavi, S., Chatterji, S., Verdes, E., Tandon, A., Patel, V., & Ustun, B. (2007). Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: Results from the world health surveys. Lancet, 370, 851–858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, P. J. (2008). An open trial of a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral group therapy for anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 39, 242–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, P. J., & Philipp, L. M. (2008). Transdiagnostic approaches to the treatment of anxiety disorders: A quantitative review. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45, 214–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W. T. (2005). Behaviour: The control of perception (2nd ed.). New Cannan, CT: Benchmark Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. B., Bonnici, D. M., Mackinnon, A. J., & Worcester, M. C. (2001). Psychometric evaluation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) among female cardiac patients. British Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 373–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, A. M., Seitchik, A. E., Gentes, E. L., Jones, J. D., & Hallion, L. S. (2011). Perseverative thought: A robust predictor of response to emotional challenge in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 867–874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problems: A cognitive-behavioural analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 571–583.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z., Teasdale, J., & Williams, M. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrom, S. C., Tsao, J. C. I., Alden, L. E., & Craske, M. G. (2000). Worry and rumination: Repetitive thought as a concomitant and predictor of negative mood. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 671–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafran, R., Clark, D. M., Fairburn, C. G., Arntz, A., Barlow, D. H., Ehlers, A., et al. (2009). Mind the gap: Improving the dissemination of CBT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 902–909.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spinhoven, P., Ormel, J., Sloekers, P. P., Kempen, G. I., Speckens, A. E., & van Hemert, A. M. (1997). A validation study of the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychological Medicine, 27, 363–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, E., Moulds, M., & Mackintosh, B. (2005). Comparisons between rumination and worry in a non-clinical population. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1577–1585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. B., Golding, J. M., & Burnam, M. A. (1988). Psychiatric disorder in a sample of the general population with and without chronic medical conditions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 976–981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On Chi-square difference and z tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge and thank Maaria Faruq for her contribution to the original questionnaires and data collection for Study 1; and Lars White and Lizzie Reilly who contributed to the study design. We also acknowledge the Emotion Regulation in Others and the Self (EROS) research group for their input during data analysis. We also acknowledge Peter Coventry, Angee Khara, Peter Bower, and Nawar Diar Bakerly, who contributed to the original study from which the sample from Study 2 is taken. During preparation of the manuscript Timothy Bird was supported by an interdisciplinary studentship from the Economic and Social Research Council and Medical Research Council [grant number ES/I024980/1].

Conflict of interest

None of the authors of the manuscript has declared any conflict of interest that may arise from being named as an author on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Bird.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bird, T., Mansell, W., Dickens, C. et al. Is There a Core Process Across Depression and Anxiety?. Cogn Ther Res 37, 307–323 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9475-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9475-2

Keywords

Navigation