Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Critical Success Factors for Peak Electricity Demand Reduction: Insights from a Successful Intervention in a Small Island Community

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines a successful residential peak electricity demand reduction project which employed a multi-disciplinary approach. The purpose of this study was to examine the critical success factors necessary for reducing peak demand and total energy consumption in a small Australian island community. This case study research is based on qualitative data obtained from semi-structured, in-depth interviews with residents from 22 households. It is proposed that the results of the examined project are transferable to other communities if the utility is able to develop the necessary trust, access, influence, and partnership with residential consumers required to create the environment for electricity demand reduction success. Findings from this research highlight the potential approach for future policymaking aimed at reducing peak electricity demand and total energy consumption in multiple communities, thus helping achieve government low carbon targets while reducing infrastructure spending.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apajalahti, E.-L., Lovio, R., & Heiskanen, E. (2015). From demand side management (DSM) to energy efficiency services: a Finnish case study. Energy Policy, 81, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J. (1994). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T. L. (1994). Doing social research. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartusch, C., Wallin, F., Odlare, M., Vassileva, I., & Wester, L. (2011). Introducing a demand-based electricity distribution tariff in the residential sector: demand response and customer perception. Energy Policy, 39(9), 5008–5025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. The British journal of social psychology / the British Psychological Society, 39 Pt, 4(4), 555–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggart, N. W., & Lutzenhiser, L. (2007). Economic sociology and the social problem of energy inefficiency. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(8), 1070–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnemaizon, A., & Batat, W. (2011). How competent are consumers? The case of the energy sector in France: how competent are consumers? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(3), 348–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bord, R. J., Fisher, A., & Robert, E. (1998). Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives. Climate Research, 11(1), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, K., Rettie, R., & Roberts, T. C. (2014). Community, the very idea!: perspectives of participants in a demand-side community energy project. People, Place & Policy Online, 8(3), 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, K., Rettie, R., & Roberts, T. C. (2016). Householder engagement with energy consumption feedback: the role of community action and communications. Energy Policy, 88, 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnard, P., Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Analysing and presenting qualitative data. BDJ, 204(8), 429–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrico, A. R., & Riemer, M. (2011). Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: an evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: William Morrow & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th, International Student Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Darby, S. (2000). Making it obvious: Designing feedback into energy consumption. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting, Naples.

  • Darby, S. (2001). Making it obvious: Designing feedback into energy consumption. Energy efficiency in household appliances and lighting (pp. 685–696). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Dieperink, C., Brand, I., & Vermeulen, W. (2004). Diffusion of energy-saving innovations in industry and the built environment: Dutch studies as inputs for a more integrated analytical framework. Energy Policy, 32(6), 773–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilbert, A., Cui, L., Jiang, H., & Wang, W. (2013). From home energy audit to retrofit and beyond: an integrated approach to residential program evaluation for utilities. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. pp 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen, A. (1994). Survey of neighborhood-based, comprehensive community empowerment initiatives. Health Education & Behavior, 21(2), 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Rating. (2013). Managing peak demand. Retrieved from http://www.energyrating.gov.au/about/other-programs/demand-response/

  • Faruqui, A., Hledik, R., Newell, S., & Pfeifenberger, H. (2007). The power of 5 percent. The Electricity Journal, 20(8), 68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faruqui, A., Sergici, S., & Sharif, A. (2010). The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption—a survey of the experimental evidence. Energy, 35(4), 1598–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. B., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V. T., Schultz, J. A., Richter, K. P., Lewis, R. K., et al. (1995). Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 677–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. (2007). Discussion Paper 8: Influencing electricity consumption via consumer feedback: A review of experience. Paper presented at the ECEEE 2007 Summer Study, 4–9 June 2007, Berlin.

  • Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 79–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., & Hobman, E. V. (2015). Household energy use: applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41(Supplement C), 1385–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (2005). Managing energy: reducing peak load and managing risk with demand response and demand side management. Refocus, 6(5), 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, G., & Stern, P. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellings, C. W., & Yeager, K. E. (2004). Transforming the electric infrastructure. Physics Today, 57(12), 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, K., Newell, R. G., & Palmer, K. (2009). Energy efficiency economics and policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1(1), 597–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyamfi, S., Krumdieck, S., & Urmee, T. (2013). Residential peak electricity demand response—highlights of some behavioural issues. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25(Supplement C), 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, E., Johnson, M., & Vadovics, E. (2013). Learning about and involving users in energy saving on the local level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, E., Berry, L., & Soderstrom, J. (1981). Review of utility home energy audit programs. Energy, 6(7), 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Qualitative research methods series, (Vol. 37.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption—A review of models of consumer behaviour and behavioural change. A Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network. London: Sustainable Development Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong, P. (2013). Qualitative research methods (Vol. 4th). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, H. (2005). Supply and demand for low energy housing in the UK: insights from a science and technology studies approach. Housing Studies, 20(5), 815–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutzenhiser, L. (1993). Social and behavioural aspects of energy use. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 18, 247–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCalley, L. T., de Vries, P. W., & Midden, C. J. H. (2011). Consumer response to product-integrated energy feedback: behavior, goal level shifts, and energy conservation. Environment and Behavior, 43(4), 525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMakin, A. H., Malone, E. L., & Lundgren, R. E. (2002). Motivating residents to conserve energy without financial incentives. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 848–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moezzi, M., Goldman, C., Sezgen, O., Bharvirkar, R., & Hopper, N. (2004). Real time pricing and the real live firm. Paper presented at the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Breaking Out of the Box, Pacific Grove, California. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/210004qd 

  • Morris, P., Buys, L., & Vine, D. (2014). Moving from outsider to insider: peer status and partnerships between electricity utilities and residential consumers. PLoS One, 9(6), e101189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 913–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parag, Y., Zur, S., & Raz, N. (2016). Levels of consumers’ agency and capacity as predictors for electricity demand reduction in the residential sector. Energy Efficiency. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9471-6.

  • Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 569–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyrko, J., & Darby, S. (2011). Conditions of energy efficient behaviour—a comparative study between Sweden and the UK. Energy Efficiency, 4(3), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, R., Helen, A., Galin, K., & Donald, R. (2005). Community engagement, performance measurement and sustainability: experiences from Canadian community-based networks. Canadian Journal of Communication, 30(2), 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Ormston, R. (2014). Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers (Vol. second). Los Angeles: Sage. pp 430.

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

  • Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data (3rd Ed.). London: Sage.

  • Sandberg, P., Söderström, M.(2003). Industrial energy efficiency: the need for investment decision support from a manager perspective. Energy Policy, 31(15), 1623–1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2004). Changing human behaviour and lifestyle: a challenge for sustainable consumption? In L. A. Reisch & I. Ropke (Eds.), The ecological economics of consumption (pp. 111–131). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siero, F. W., Bakker, A. B., Dekker, G. B., & Van Den Burg, M. T. C. (1996). Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (1999). Information, incentives, and proenvironmental consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Policy, 22(4), 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2008). The economics of climate change. The American Economic Review, 98(2), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeglehner, G., Baaske, W., Mitter, H., Niemetz, N., Kettl, K.-H., Weiss, M., et al. (2014). Sustainability appraisal of residential energy demand and supply—a life cycle approach including heating, electricity, embodied energy and mobility. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 4(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn, B., & Martin, M. (2000). Industrial energy efficiency decision making. Energy Policy, 28(12), 831–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vine, D., Buys, L., & Morris, P. (2013). The effectiveness of energy feedback for conservation and peak demand: a literature review. Open Journal of Energy Efficiency, 2(1), 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N. B., & Duran, B. (2006). Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice, 7(3), 312–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2007). Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(1), 169–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winett, R. A., & Ester, P. (1983). Behavioral science and energy conservation: conceptualizations, strategies, outcomes, energy policy applications. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(3–4), 203–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. (2008). Who pays for the ‘beer fridge’? Evidence from Canada. Energy Policy, 36(2), 553–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, W., & Middlemiss, L. (2012). A rethink of how policy and social science approach changing individuals’ actions on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy, 41(1), 742–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Design, Creative Industries Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia

    Peter Morris & Laurie Buys

  2. School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia

    Desley Vine

Authors
  1. Peter Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Desley Vine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laurie Buys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desley Vine.

Ethics declarations

The Queensland University of Technology Human Ethics Committee granted ethics approval for interviews to take place, with written consent obtained from each participant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morris, P., Vine, D. & Buys, L. Critical Success Factors for Peak Electricity Demand Reduction: Insights from a Successful Intervention in a Small Island Community. J Consum Policy 41, 33–54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-017-9366-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-017-9366-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation