Abstract
Telepsychiatry, the use of televideo in psychiatric assessment and treatment, is utilized throughout Canada. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is common, with significant burdens of suffering and cost. This systematic review explores the literature on the use of televideo to diagnose and treat MDD, particularly acceptability and patient satisfaction, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. A literature search was conducted for years 1946 to 2019. Study eligibility criteria included: MDD as the condition of interest, use of televideo technology, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), Adult (18 years or older) population, any clinical setting, and any healthcare professional providing care. The study must have included at least one of the following measures, satisfaction, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Fourteen studies were included. Satisfaction is equivalent to or significantly higher than face-to-face intervention. Both televideo and control groups found relief from depressive symptoms, with differences either statistically insignificant or in favour of televideo. Despite increased cost upfront for televideo due to the technology required, televideo would eventually be more cost-effective due to reducing travel expenses. Limitations include that there is little RCT data, and what exists often uses a collaborative treatment model. Many studies consisted solely of U.S. Veterans, and have limited generalizability. Further research needed to directly compare psychiatrist assessment over televideo versus in-person, and determine if particular patient subgroups benefit more from televideo or in-person intervention.
Systematic review registration number: CRD42016048224.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT). (2016). Clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: Disease burden and principles of care. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(9), 510–523.
Cevik, M., Bamford, C. G. G., & Ho, A. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic-a focused review for clinicians. Clinical Microbiology & Infection, 26(7), 842–847.
Chaet, D., Clearfield, R., Sabin, J. E., et al. (2017). Ethical practice in telehealth and telemedicine. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32(10), 1136–1140.
Choi, N. G., Marti, C. N., Bruce, M. L., et al. (2014). Six-month postintervention depression and disability outcomes of in-home telehealth problem-solving therapy for depressed, low-income homebound older adults. Depress Anxiety, 31, 653–661.
Chong, J., & Moreno, F. (2012). Feasibility and acceptability of clinic-based telepsychiatry for low-income Hispanic primary care patients. Telemedicine and e-Health, 18(4), 297–304.
Egede, L. E., Acierno, R., Knapp, R. G., et al. (2015). Psychotherapy for depression in older veterans via telemedicine: A randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Psychiatry, 2, 693–701.
Egede, L. E., Acierno, R., Knapp, R. G., et al. (2016). Psychotherapy for depression in older veterans via telemedicine: Effect on quality of life, satisfaction, treatment credibility, and service delivery perception. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 77(12), 1704–1711.
Egede, L. E., Gebregziabhera, M., Walker, R. J., et al. (2017). Trajectory of cost overtime after psychotherapy for depression in older Veterans via telemedicine. Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 157–162.
Egede, L. E., Dismuke, C. E., Walker, R. J., et al. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of behavioural activation for depression in older adult veterans: In person-care versus telehealth. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 79(5), e1–e8.
Fortney, J. C., Pyne, J. M., Edlund, M. J., et al. (2007). A randomized trial of telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(8), 1086–1093.
Fortney, J. C., Maciejewski, M. L., Tripathi, S. P., et al. (2011). A budget impact analysis of telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression. Medical Care, 49(9), 872–880.
Fortney, J. C., Pyne, J. M., Mouden, S. B., et al. (2013). Practice-based versus telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression in rural federally qualified health centers: A pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 414–425.
García-Lizana, F., & Muñoz-Mayorga, I. (2010). Telemedicine for depression: A systematic review. Perspect in Psychiatr Care, 46(2), 119–126.
Hubley, S., Lynch, S. B., Schneck, C., et al. (2016). Review of key telepsychiatry outcomes. World Journal of Psychiatry, 6(2), 269–282.
Lambert, K., & Wertheimer, M. (2016). Telepsychiatry: Who, what, where, and how. Psychiatric News. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2016.2a13.
Luxton, D. D., Pruitt, L. D., Wagner, A., et al. (2016). Home-based telebehavioral health for U.S. military personnel and veterans with depression: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(11), 923–934.
Moreno, F. A., Chong, J., Dumbauld, J., et al. (2012). Use of standard webcam and internet equipment for telepsychiatry treatment of depression among underserved Hispanics. Psychiatric Services, 63(12), 1213–1217.
Ontario Telemedicine Network. (2018). OTN Annual report 2017/18. Retrieved April 7, 2019, from https://otn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/otn-annual-report.pdf.
Pyne, J. M., Fortney, J. C., Mouden, S., et al. (2015). Cost-effectiveness of on-site versus off-site collaborative care for depression in rural FQHCs. Psychiatric Services, 66(5), 491–499.
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). (2013). Telepsychiatry: RANZCP telehealth survey results. Retrieved October 20, 2019, from https://www.ranzcp.org/files/resources/practice-resources/telehealth-survey-results-v11-(2).aspx.
Ruskin, P. E., Silver-Aylaian, M., Kling, M. A., et al. (2004). Treatment outcomes in depression: Comparison of remote treatment through telepsychiatry to in-person treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1471–1476.
Serhal, E., Crawford, A., Cheng, J., et al. (2017). Implementation and utilisation of telepsychiatry in Ontario: A Population-based study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 62(10), 716–725.
Smolenski, D. J., Pruitt, L. D., Vuletic, S., et al. (2017). Unobserved heterogeneity in response to treatment for depression through videoconference. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 40(3), 303–308.
Wampold, B. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14(3), 270–277.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guaiana, G., Mastrangelo, J., Hendrikx, S. et al. A Systematic Review of the Use of Telepsychiatry in Depression. Community Ment Health J 57, 93–100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00724-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00724-2