Abstract
Data interpretation is a common task in geoscientific disciplines. Interpretation difficulties occur especially if the data that have to be interpreted are of arbitrary dimension. This paper describes the application of a statistical method, called self-organizing mapping (SOM), to interpret multidimensional, non-linear, and highly noised geophysical data for purposes of geological prediction. The underlying theory is explained, and the method is applied to a six-dimensional seismic data set. Results of SOM classifications can be represented as two-dimensional images, called feature maps. Feature maps illustrate the complexity and demonstrate interrelations between single features or clusters of the complete feature space. SOM images can be visually described and easily interpreted. The advantage is that the SOM method considers interdependencies between all geophysical features at each instance. An application example of an automated geological interpretation based on the geophysical data is shown.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klose, C.D.: Engineering geological rock mass characterisation of granitic gneisses based on seismic in-situ measurements, Scientific Technical Report, GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam (2004). STR 04/08, http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/bib/pub/str0408/0408.htm
Ji, S., Salisbury, M.: Shear-wave velocities, anisotropy and splitting in high-grade mylonites. Tectonophysics 221, 453–473 (1993)
Garbin, H.D., Knopoff, L.: The compressional modulus of a material permeated by a random distribution of circular cracks. Q. Appl. Math. 30, 453–464 (1973)
Garbin, H.D., Knopoff, L.: The shear modulus of a material permeated by a random distribution of free circular cracks. Q. Appl. Math. 33, 296–300 (1975)
O'Connel, R.J., Budiansk, B.: Seismic velocities in dry and saturated cracked solids. J. Geophys. Res. 79(35), 5412–5426 (1974)
Henyey, T.H., Pomphrey, R.J.: Self-consistent moduli of a cracked soil. Geophys. Res. Lett. 9, 903–906 (1982)
Moos, D., Zoback, M.D.: In situ studies of velocity in fractured crystalline rocks. J. Geophys. Res. 88(B3), 2345–2358 (1983)
Stierman, D.J.: Geophysical and geological evidence for fracturing, water circulation and chemical alteration in granitic rocks adjacent to major strike slip faults. J. Geophys. Res. 89(B7), 5849–5857 (1984)
Kohonen, T.: Self-organizing formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern. 43(1), 59–69 (1982)
Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd edition. Springer, Berlin (2001)
Bieniawski, Z.T.: Engineering Rock Mass Classification. Wiley, New York (1989)
Vesanto, J.: Data Exploration Process Based on Self-Organizing Map. PhD thesis, Helsinki University of Technology (2002) http://lib.tkk.fi/Diss/2002/isbn9512258978/
Silverman, B.W.: Density Estimation. London (1986)
LeCun, Y.: Effective Learning and Second-order Methods, A Tutorial at NIPS 93. Denver (1993)
Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)
Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.J.: Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (1990)
Klose, C.D., Loew, S.: Engineering geological rock mass characterisation of granitic gneisses based on seismic in-situ measurements during tunnel excavations. In: Schubert, W. (ed.) Rock Engineering Theory and Practice, ISRM Regional Symposium EUROCK '04, pp. 120–126. VGE (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klose, C.D. Self-organizing maps for geoscientific data analysis: geological interpretation of multidimensional geophysical data. Comput Geosci 10, 265–277 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-006-9022-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-006-9022-x