Abstract
HER receptor family plays an important role in normal embryonic development and is involved in pathogenesis and progression of some types of cancer. Neuroblastic tumors (NT) are common pediatric neoplasms with a poor outcome in a significant number of patients. The biological and prognostic role of HER family in NT is not well established. In the current study we evaluated HER1–4 receptors expression, their prognostic significance and clinicopathological correlations in a series of 103 NTs by immunohistochemical assessment of HER1–4 expression and FISH analysis of EGFR and HER2 copy number status. HER receptors are commonly expressed in NT but it was not due to EGFR or HER2 amplification. EGFR, HER2 and HER4 show correlation with tumor histology. It seems that these receptors take part in neuroblastic cell differentiation and Schwannian stroma development. EGFR and HER2 positivity are more frequently found in favorable histological risk group of tumours (P = 0.004 and P = 0.01 respectively) while high expression of HER4 is significantly more often found in patients with metastatic disease (P = 0.03). Moreover tumors with HER2 polysomy were more often found in children ≤18 months, with localized disease, and favorable histological group. Our study showed that the role of HER family members in NT biology is interrelated and complex but their expression level may present a novel prognostic factor for NT patients outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References:
Brodeur G (2003) Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigma. Nat Rev Cancer 3:203–216
Maris J, Hogarty M, Bagatell R, Cohn S (2007) Neuroblastoma. Lancet 369:2106–2120
Nakagawara A (2004) Neural crest development and neuroblastoma: the genetic and biological link. Prog Brain Res 146:233–242
Mosse YP, Laudenslager M, Longo L, Maris J (2008) Identification of ALK as a major familial neuroblastoma predisposition gene. Nature 455:930–935
Shimada H, Ambros I, Dehner L et al (1999) The international neuroblastoma pathology classification (the Shimada system). Cancer 86:364–372
Joshi W, Silverman J, Altshuler G et al (1993) Systematization of primary histopathologic and fine-needle aspiration cytologic features and description of unusual histopathologic feature of neuroblastic tumors: a report from the Pediatric Oncology Group. Hum Pathol 24:493–504
Cohn S, Pearson A, London W et al (2009) The international neuroblastoma risk group (INRG) classification system: an INRG task force report. J Clin Oncol 27:289–297
Fong A, Park J (2009) High-risk neuroblastoma: a therapy in evolution. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 26:539–548
Jakacki R, Hamilton M, Gilbertson R et al (2008) Pediatric phase I and pharmacokinetic study of Erlotinib followed by the combination of Erlotinib and Temozolomid: a children’s oncology group phase I consortium study. J Clin Oncol 26:4921–4927
Vermuelen J, De Preter K, Naranjo A et al (2009) Predicting outcomes for children with neuroblastoma using a multigene expression signature: a retrospective SIOPEN/COG/GPOH study. Lancet Oncol 10:663–671
Baselga J, Swain S (2009) Novel anticancer targets: revisiting ERBB2 and discovering ERBB3. Nat Rev Cancer 9:463–475
Citri A, Yarden Y (2006) EGF-ERBB signaling: towards the systems level. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:505–516
Zaczek A, Brandt B, Bielawski KP (2005) The diverse signaling network of EGFR, HER2, HER3 and HER4 tyrosine kinase receptors and the consequences for therapeutic approaches. Histol Histopathol 20:1005–1015
Britsch S, Li L, Kirchhoff S et al (1998) The ErbB2 and ErbB3 receptors and their ligand, neuregulin-1, are essential for development of the sympathetic nervous system. Genes Dev 12:1825–1836
Casalini P, Iorio M, Galmozzi E, Menard S (2004) Role of HER receptors family in development and differentiation. J Cell Physiol 200:343–350
Chan R, Hardy W, Laing M, Hardy S, Muller W (2002) The catalytic activity of the ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase is essential for embryonic development. Mol Cell Biol 22:1073–1078
Ganti R, Skapek S, Zhang J et al (2006) Expression and genomic status of EGFR and ErbB-2 in alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Modern Pathol 19:1213–1220
Ho R, Minturn J, Hishiki T et al (2005) Proliferation of human neuroblastomas mediated by the epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Res 65:9868–9875
Richards KN, Zweidler-McKay PA, Van Roy N et al (2010) Signaling of ERBB receptor tyrosine kinases promotes neuroblastoma growth in vitro and in vivo. Cancer 116:3233–3243
Qualman S, Bowen J, Fitzgibbons P et al (2005) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with neuroblastoma and related neuroblastic tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:874–883
Izycka-Swieszewska E, Wozniak A, Kot J et al (2010) Prognostic significance of HER2 expression in neuroblastic tumors. Mod Pathol 23:1261–1268
Corzo C, Bellosillo B, Corominas J et al (2007) Does polysomy of chromosome 17 have a role in ERBB2 and topoisomerase IIα expression. Tumor Biol 28:221–228
Varella-Garcia M (2006) Stratification of non-small cell lung cancer patients for therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: the EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization assay. Diagn Pathol 1:19
Vandensompele J, Baudis M, De Preter K et al (2005) Unequivocal delineation of clinicogenetic subgroups and development of a new model for improved outcome prediction in neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 23:2280–2299
Gilbertson RJ (2005) ERBB2 in pediatric cancer: innocent until proven guilty. Oncologist 10:508–517
Rogers S, Harrington K, Rhys-Evans P et al (2005) Biological significance of c-erbB family oncogenes in head and neck cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 24:47–69
Layfield L, Thompson K, Dodge R, Kerns B (1995) Prognostic indicators for neuroblastoma: stage, grade, DNA ploidy, MIB-1-proliferation index, p53, HER-2/neu and EGFR—a survival study. J Surg Oncol 59:21–27
Tamura S, Hosoi H, Kuwahara Y et al (2007) Induction of apoptosis by an inhibitor of EGFR in neuroblastoma cells. BBRC 358:226–232
Rossler J, Odenthal E, Geoerger B et al (2009) EGFR inhibition using Gefitinib is not active in neuroblastoma cell lines. Anticancer Res 29:1327–1334
Chiu B, Mirkin B, Madonna M (2007) Epidermal growth factor can induce apoptosis in neuroblastoma. Mitogenic and apoptotic actions of EGF on neuroblastoma cells are concentration-dependent. J Ped Surg 42:482–488
Tovey S, Reeves J, Stanton P, Ozanne B, Barlett J, Cooke T (2006) Low expression of HER2 protein in breast cancer is biologically significant. J Pathol 210:358–362
Goji J, Nakamura H, Ito H, Mabuchi O, Hashimoto K, Sano K (1995) Expression of c-ErbB2 in human neuroblastoma tissues, adrenal medulla adjacent to tumor, and developing mouse neural crest cells. Am J Pathol 146:660–672
Gambini C, Sementa AR, Boni L et al (2003) Expression of HER2/neu is uncommon in human neuroblastic tumors and is unrelated to tumor progression. Cancer Immunol Immunother 52:116–120
Hayashi M, Inokuchi M, Takagi Y et al (2008) High expression of HER3 is associated with a decreased survival in gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:7843–7849
Witton C, Reeves J, Going J, Cooke T, Barlett J (2003) Expression of the HER1–4 family of receptor tyrosine kinases in breast cancer. J Pathol 200:290–297
Srinivasan R, Poulsom R, Hurst H, Gullick W (1998) Expression of the c-erbB-4/HER4 protein and mRNA in normal human fetal and adult tissues and in a survey of nine solid tumor types. J Pathol 185:236–245
Muraoka-Cook R, Sandahl M, Husted C et al (2006) The intracellular domain of ErbB4 induces differentiation of mammary epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell 17:4118–4129
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant from Polish MEN N401 176 31/3867. The authors thank Dagmara Warzocha and Anita Matyskiel for their excellent technical support.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska and Agnieszka Wozniak contributed equally.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Izycka-Swieszewska, E., Wozniak, A., Drozynska, E. et al. Expression and significance of HER family receptors in neuroblastic tumors. Clin Exp Metastasis 28, 271–282 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-010-9369-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-010-9369-1