Abstract
Although cellulose nanomaterials have promising properties and performance in a wide application space, one hinderance to their wide scale industrial application has been associated with their economics of dewatering and drying and the ability to redisperse them back into suspension without introducing agglomerates or lose of yield. The present work investigates the dewatering of aqueous suspensions of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) using ultrasound as a potentially low-cost, non-thermal, and scalable alternative to traditional heat-based drying methods such as spray drying. Specifically, we use vibrating mesh transducers to develop a direct-contact mode ultrasonic dewatering platform to remove water from CNF suspensions in a continuous manner. We demonstrate that the degree of dewatering is modulated by the number of transducers, their spatial configuration, and the flow rate of the CNF suspension. Water removal of up to 72 wt.% is achieved, corresponding to a final CNF concentration of 11 wt.% in 30 min using a two-transducer configuration. To evaluate the redispersibility of the dewatered CNF material, we use a microscopic analysis to quantify the morphology of the redispersed CNF suspension. By developing a custom software pipeline to automate image analysis, we compare the histograms of the dimensions of the redispersed dewatered fibrils with the original CNF samples and observe no significant difference, suggesting that no agglomeration is induced due to ultrasonic dewatering. We also perform SEM analysis to evaluate the nanoscale morphology of these fibrils showing a width range of 20 nm–4 um. We estimate that this ultrasound dewatering technique is also energy-efficient, consuming up to 36% less energy than the enthalpy of evaporation per kilogram of water. Together with the inexpensive cost of transducers (< $1), the potential for scaling up in parallel flow configurations, and excellent redispersion of the dewatered CNFs, our work offers a proof-of-concept of a sustainable CNF dewatering system, that addresses the shortcomings of existing techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availablity
All MATLAB code and data for this article are accessible here: https://github.com/bhamla-lab/Ultrasound_CNF_Dewatering2021
References
Al Zaitone B (2019) Drying kinetics of cellulose nanofibers suspensions. In: 21st international drying symposium. pp 11–14
Amini EN, Tajvidi M, Bousfield DW et al (2019) Dewatering behavior of a wood-cellulose nanofibril particulate system. Sci Rep 9(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51177-x
Astorsdotter J (2017) Dewatering cellulose nanofibril suspensions through centrifugation
Baker CGJ, McKenzie KA (2005) Energy consumption of industrial spray dryers. Dry Technol 23:365–386. https://doi.org/10.1081/DRT-200047665
Beck S, Bouchard J, Berry R (2012) Dispersibility in water of dried nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 13:1486–1494
Beuguel Q, Tavares JR, Carreau PJ, Heuzey M (2018) Ultrasonication of spray-and freeze-dried cellulose nanocrystals in water. J Coll Interface Sci 516:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.035
Boucher RMG (1959a) Ultrasonic boosts heatless drying.pdf. Chem Eng 66:151–154
Boucher RMG (1959b) Drying by airborne ultrasonics. Ultrason News 3:8–9
Clayton SA, Scholes ON, Hoadley AFA et al (2006) Dewatering of biomaterials by mechanical thermal expression. Dry Technol 24:819–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930600733093
Čolić M, Tomić S, Bekić M (2020) Immunological aspects of nanocellulose. Immunol Lett 222:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2020.04.004
Dimic-Misic K, Maloney T, Gane P (2018) Effect of fibril length, aspect ratio and surface charge on ultralow shear-induced structuring in micro and nanofibrillated cellulose aqueous suspensions. Cellulose 25:117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1584-3
Dimic-Misic K, Maloney T, Liu G, Gane P (2017) Micro nanofibrillated cellulose (MNFC) gel dewatering induced at ultralow-shear in presence of added colloidally-unstable particles. Cellulose 24:1463–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1181-x
Dimic-Misic K, Puisto A, Paltakari J et al (2013) The influence of shear on the dewatering of high consistency nanofibrillated cellulose furnishes. Cellulose 20:1853–1864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9964-9
Engineering Toolbox (2010) Water-heat of vaporization. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/water-properties-d_1573.html. Accessed 4 Jun 2021
Foster EJ, Moon RJ, Heux L et al (2018) Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 47:2609–2679. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00895j
Gallego-Juárez JA, Riera E, de la Fuente BS et al (2007) Application of high-power ultrasound for dehydration of vegetables: processes and devices. Dry Technol 25:1893–1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930701677371
Gallego-Juárez JA, Rodriguez-Corral G, Moraleda JCG, Yang TS (1999) A new high-intensity ultrasonic technology for food dehydration. Dry Technol 17:597–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373939908917555
García-Pérez JV, Carcel JA, Mulet A, Riera E, Gallego-Juarez JA (2015) Ultrasonic drying for food preservation, Power ultrasonics. Elsevier, pp 875–910, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-028-6.00029-6
Geng L, Mittal N, Zhan C et al (2018) Understanding the mechanistic behavior of highly charged cellulose nanofibers in aqueous systems. Macromolecules 51:1498–1506. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.7b02642
Greguss P (1963) The mechanism and possible applications of drying by ultrasonic irradiation. Ultrasonics 1:83–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-624X(63)90059-3
Han J, Zhou C, Wu Y et al (2013) Self-assembling behavior of cellulose nanoparticles during freeze-drying: effect of suspension concentration, particle size, crystal structure, and surface charge. Biomacromolecules 14:1529–1540. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm4001734
Hanif Z, Jeon H, Tran TH et al (2018) Butanol-mediated oven-drying of nanocellulose with enhanced dehydration rate and aqueous re-dispersion. J Polym Res 25:191
Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H, Nogi M (2005) Optically transparent composites reinforced with plant fiber-based nanofibers. Appl Phys A 1112:1109–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-005-3316-z
Kelly PV, Gardner DJ, WMGramlich (2021) Optimizing lignocellulosic nanofibril dimensions and morphology by mechanical refining for enhanced adhesion. Carbohyd Polym 273:11856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118566
Miller T, Kramer C, Fisher A (2015) Bandwidth study on energy use and potential energy saving opportunities in U.S. pulp and paper manufacturing. US Dep Energy
Missoum K, Bras J, Belgacem MN (2012) Water redispersible dried nanofibrillated cellulose by adding sodium chloride. Biomacromolecules 13:4118–4125
Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J et al (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00108b
Musielak G, Mierzwa D, Kroehnke J (2016) Food drying enhancement by ultrasound–a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 56:126–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.08.003
Nigmatullin R, Johns MA, Muñoz-García JC et al (2020) Hydrophobization of cellulose nanocrystals for aqueous colloidal suspensions and gels. Biomacromolecules 21:1812–1823. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01721
Park C-W, Han S-Y, Namgung H-W et al (2017) Effect of spray-drying condition and surfactant addition on morphological characteristics of spray-dried nanocellulose. J Environ Sci 33:33–38. https://doi.org/10.7747/jfes.2017.33.1.33
Patel DK, Dutta SD, Lim KT (2019) Nanocellulose-based polymer hybrids and their emerging applications in biomedical engineering and water purification. RSC Adv 9:19143–19162. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra03261d
Peng Y, Gardner DJ (2013) Influence of drying method on the material properties of nanocellulose I: thermostability and crystallinity. Cellulose 20:2379–2392
Peng Y, Gardner DJ, Han Y (2012a) Drying cellulose nanofibrils: in search of a suitable method. Cellulose 19:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9630-z
Peng Y, Gardner DJ, Han Y (2012b) Drying cellulose nanofibrils : morphology characterization. In: 55th international convention of society of wood science and technology. pp 1–9
Peng Y, Gardner DJ, Han Y et al (2013) Influence of drying method on the surface energy of cellulose nanofibrils determined by inverse gas chromatography. J Colloid Interface Sci 405:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.05.033
Peng C, Momen AM, Moghaddam S (2017a) An energy-efficient method for direct-contact ultrasonic cloth drying. Energy 138:133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.025
Peng C, Ravi S, Patel VK et al (2017b) Physics of direct-contact ultrasonic cloth drying process *. Energy 125:498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.138
Penttila PA, Ra P, Maunu SL et al (2012) The effect of drying method on the properties and nanoscale structure of cellulose whiskers. Cellulose 901:912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9695-3
Quiévy N, Jacquet N, Sclavons M et al (2010) Influence of homogenization and drying on the thermal stability of microfibrillated cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 95:306–314
Rantanen J, Maloney TC (2015) Consolidation and dewatering of a microfibrillated cellulose fiber composite paper in wet pressing. Eur Polym J 68:585–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.045
Rebouillat S, Pla F (2013) State of the art manufacturing and engineering of nanocellulose: a review of available data and industrial applications. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol 04:165–188. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2013.42022
Sabarez H, Swiergon P, Knoerzer K (2019) Drying process and apparatus
Sehaqui H, Liu A, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2010) Fast preparation procedure for large, flat cellulose and cellulose/inorganic nanopaper structures. Biomacromolecules 2195:2198
Sethi J, Oksman K, Illikainen M, Sirviö JA (2018) Sonication-assisted surface modification method to expedite the water removal from cellulose nanofibers for use in nanopapers and paper making. Carbohydr Polym 197:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.05.072
Sim K, Lee J, Lee H, Youn HJ (2015) Flocculation behavior of cellulose nanofibrils under different salt conditions and its impact on network strength and dewatering ability. Cellulose 22:3689–3700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0784-y
Sinquefield S, Ciesielski PN, Li K et al (2020) Nanocellulose dewatering and drying: current state and future perspectives. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:9601–9615. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01797
UMaine The Process development Center (2021) https://umaine.edu/pdc/nanocellulose/. Accessed 7 Jul 2021
Wetterling J, Jonsson S, Mattsson T, Theliander H (2017) The influence of ionic strength on the electroassisted filtration of microcrystalline cellulose. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:12789–12798. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03575
Wetterling J, Sahlin K, Mattsson T et al (2018) Electroosmotic dewatering of cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose 25:2321–2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1733-3
Zhai L, Kim HC, Kim JW, Kim J (2020) Simple centrifugal fractionation to reduce the size distribution of cellulose nanofibers. Sci Rep 10(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68642-7
Zimmermann MVG, Borsoi C, Lavoratti A et al (2016) Drying techniques applied to cellulose nanofibers. J Reinf Plast Compos 35:682–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684415626286
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support from Renewable Bioproducts Institute at Georgia Tech, Atlanta, USA. The authors would also like to thank the team from the Process Development Centre at University of Maine, Dr. Colleen Walker, Dr. Douglas Bousfield and Donna A. Johnson, for advising with the benchmarking experiments and providing samples.
Funding
Renewable Bioproducts Institute, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Consent for publication
The authors consent for publication by the journal.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file2 (MP4 18224 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ringania, U., Harrison, J., Moon, R.J. et al. Dewatering of cellulose nanofibrils using ultrasound. Cellulose 29, 5575–5591 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04626-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04626-2