Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using a multi-feature learning method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We hypothesized that a multiparametric evaluation, based on the combination of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters, could enhance the appraisal of the likelihood of reverse remodeling and prognosis of favorable clinical evolution to improve the response of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Three hundred and twenty-three heart failure patients were retrospectively included in this multicenter study. 221 patients (68%) were responders, defined by a decrease in left ventricle end-systolic volume ≥15% at the 6-month follow-up. In addition, strain data coming from echocardiography were analyzed with custom-made signal processing methods. Integrals of regional longitudinal strain signals from the beginning of the cardiac cycle to strain peak and to the instant of aortic valve closure were analyzed. QRS duration, septal flash and different other features manually extracted were also included in the analysis. The random forest (RF) method was applied to analyze the relative feature importance, to select the most significant features and to build an ensemble classifier with the objective of predicting response to CRT. The set of most significant features was composed of Septal Flash, E, E/A, E/EA, QRS, left ventricular end-diastolic volume and eight features extracted from strain curves. A Monte Carlo cross-validation method with 100 runs was applied, using, in each run, different random sets of 80% of patients for training and 20% for testing. Results show a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.809 with a standard deviation of 0.05. A multiparametric approach using a combination of echo-based parameters of left ventricular dyssynchrony and QRS duration helped to improve the prediction of the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS et al (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 37:2129–2200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Normand C, Linde C, Singh J, Dickstein K (2018) Indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison of the major international guidelines. JACC Heart Fail 6:308–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, Sun J-P, Nihoyannopoulos P, Merlino J et al (2008) Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation 117:2608–2616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Galli E, Leclercq C, Hubert A, Bernard A, Smiseth OA, Mabo P et al (2018) Role of myocardial constructive work in the identification of responders to CRT. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19(9):1010–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernard A, Donal E, Leclercq C, Schnell F, Fournet M, Reynaud A et al (2015) Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular mechanics: understanding the response through a new quantitative approach based on longitudinal strain integrals. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:700–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mada RO, Lysyansky P, Duchenne J, Beyer R, Mada C, Muresan L et al (2016) New automatic tools to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29:966–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stankovic I, Prinz C, Ciarka A, Daraban AM, Kotrc M, Aarones M et al (2016) Relationship of visually assessed apical rocking and septal flash to response and long-term survival following cardiac resynchronization therapy (PREDICT- CRT). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell K, Eriksen M, Aaberge L, Wilhelmsen N, Skulstad H, Remme EW et al (2012) A novel clinical method for quantification of regional left ventricular pressure–strain loop area: a non-invasive index of myocardial work. Eur Heart J 33:724–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lumens J, Tayal B, Walmsley J, Delgado-Montero A, Huntjens PR, Schwartzman D et al (2015) Differentiating electromechanical from non-electrical substrates of mechanical discoordination to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8:e003744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Daubert C, Behar N, Martins RP, Mabo P, Leclercq C (2017) Avoiding non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a practical guide. Eur Heart J 38:1463–1472

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cleland JGF, Mareev Y, Linde C (2015) Reflections on EchoCRT: sound guidance on QRS duration and morphology for CRT? Eur Heart J 36:1948–1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cikes M, Sanchez-Martinez S, Claggett B, Duchateau N, Piella G, Butakoff C et al (2019) Machine learning based phenogrouping in heart failure to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Heart Fail 21(1):74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Darcy AM, Louie AK, Roberts LW (2016) Machine learning and the profession of medicine. JAMA 315:551–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shameer K, Johnson KW, Glicksberg BS, Dudley JT, Sengupta PP (2018) Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet? Heart; heartjnl-2017-311198

  15. Dickstein K, Vardas PE, Auricchio A, Daubert J-C, Linde C, McMurray J et al (2010) ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). 2010 Focused Update of ESC Guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: an update of the 2008 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy. Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 31:2677–2687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, Lancellotti P, Muraru D, Picard MH, Rietzschel ER, Rudski L, Spencer KT, Tsang W, Voigt J-U (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39.e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Google Scholar 

  18. Abraham A, Pedregosa F, Eickenberg M, Gervais P, Mueller AS, Kossaifi J, Gramfort A, Thirion B, Varoquaux G (2014) Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn. Front Neuroinform 8:14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2014.00014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pitzalis MV, Iacoviello M, Romito R, Massari F, Rizzon B, Luzzi G et al (2002) Cardiac resynchronization therapy tailored by echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular asynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:1615–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Díaz-Infante E, Sitges M, Vidal B, Mont L, Delgado V, Marigliano A et al (2007) Usefulness of ventricular dyssynchrony measured using M-mode echocardiography to predict response to resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 100:84–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Bommel RJ, Ypenburg C, Borleffs CJW, Delgado V, Marsan NA, Bertini M et al (2010) Value of tissue Doppler echocardiography in predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol 105:1153–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Risum N, Tayal B, Hansen TF, Bruun NE, Jensen MT, Lauridsen TK et al (2015) Identification of typical left bundle branch block contraction by strain echocardiography is additive to electrocardiography in prediction of long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:631–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gorcsan J III, Abraham T, Agler DA, Bax JJ, Derumeaux G, Grimm RA et al (2008) Echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy: recommendations for performance and reporting–a report from the American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony Writing Group endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21:191–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Galli E, Leclercq C, Fournet M, Hubert A, Bernard A, Smiseth OA et al (2018) Value of myocardial work estimation in the prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31:220–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lim P, Donal E, Lafitte S, Derumeaux G, Habib G, Réant P et al (2011) Multicentre study using strain delay index for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (MUSIC study). Eur J Heart Fail 13:984–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vecera J, Penicka M, Eriksen M, Russell K, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Smiseth OA (2016) Wasted septal work in left ventricular dyssynchrony: a novel principle to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:624–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Donal E, Hubert A, Le Rolle V, Leclercq C, Martins RP, Mabo P et al (2019) New multiparametric analysis of cardiac dyssynchrony: machine learning and prediction of response to CRT. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 12:1887–1888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldstein BA, Navar AM, Carter RE (2017) Moving beyond regression techniques in cardiovascular risk prediction: applying machine learning to address analytic challenges. Eur Heart J 38:1805–1814

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Samad MD, Wehner GJ, Arbabshirani MR, Jing L, Powell AJ, Geva T et al (2018) Predicting deterioration of ventricular function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot using machine learning. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19:730–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Narula S, Shameer K, Salem Omar AM, Dudley JT, Sengupta PP (2016) Machine-learning algorithms to automate morphological and functional assessments in 2D echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:2287–2295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sengupta PP, Huang Y-M, Bansal M, Ashrafi A, Fisher M, Shameer K et al (2016) Cognitive machine-learning algorithm for cardiac imaging clinical perspective: a pilot study for differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9(6):e004330. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Le Rolle V, Hernández AI, Richard P, Donal E, Carrault G (2008) Model-based analysis of myocardial strain data acquired by Tissue Doppler Imaging. Artif Intell Med 44:201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR), under grant ANR-16-CE19-0008-01 (project MAESTRO). We thank Oslo and Leuven teams for their participation in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erwan Donal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no commercial products involved in this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1803 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallard, A., Hubert, A., Smiseth, O. et al. Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using a multi-feature learning method. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37, 989–998 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02083-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02083-1

Keywords

Navigation