Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of myocardial flow reserve prediction without the use of dynamic data from myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantification of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) provides diagnostic value for detection of cardiovascular artery disease. However, the common calculation method for MFR requires dynamic acquisition and specific software. The study aimed to predict coronary artery disease by simpler calculation of myocardial count without the use of dynamic data from 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography (MP-PET). This study included 40 consecutive patients suspected of ischemic heart disease and 7 healthy controls (34 men and 13 women, 66 ± 12 years). All participants underwent adenosine stress and rest 13N-ammonia MP-PET. From the dynamic images, the MFR in the entire left ventricular myocardium (ELV) and the three-vessel area was calculated by dividing stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) by rest MBF. From the static images, the myocardium-to-background ratio (MBR) was calculated by dividing each area’s counts/pixel by background counts in the upper thoracic aorta/pixel in both stress and rest images. The MBR-increasing rate (MBR-IR) was calculated by dividing stress MBR by rest MBR. The relationship between MFR and MBR-IR in each area was examined. The cutoff diagnostic value of MBR-IR corresponding to that of MFR for detection of cardiovascular artery disease was calculated. Each MBR-IR was closely correlated with each MFR (r = 0.830 in ELV, r = 0.864 in LAD, r = 0.829 in LCX, r = 0.757 in RCA). The cutoff values of MBR-IR were 1.45 in ELV, 1.46 in LAD, 1.41 in LCX, and 1.45 in RCA, respectively. This study demonstrated that quantification of MBR-IR may provide diagnostic value for detection of coronary artery disease as well as MFR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ter-Pogossian MM, Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Mullani NA (1975) Apositron-emission transaxial tomograph for nuclear imaging (PETT). Radiology 114:89–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schelbert HR, Phelps ME, Hoffman E, Huang SC, Kuhl DE (1980) Regional myocardial blood flow, metabolism and function assessed noninvasively with positron emission tomography. Am J Cardiol 46:1269–1277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaemperli O, Bengel FM, Kaufmann PA (2011) Cardiac hybrid imaging. Eur Heart J 32:2100–2108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh N, Rimoldi OE, Beanlands RS, Camici PG (2010) Assessment of myocardial ischaemia and viability: role of positron emission tomography. Eur Heart J 31:2984–2995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Gebhard C et al (2012) Diagnosticvalue of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET: added value of myocardial flow reserve. J Nucl Med 53:1230–1234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Valenta I et al (2009) Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:150–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van de Hoef TP, van Lavieren MA, Damman P et al (2014) Physiological basis and long-term clinical outcome of discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7:301–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yokoyama I, Ohtake T, Momomura S, Nishikawa J, Sasaki Y, Omata M (1996) Reduced coronary flow reserve in hypercholesterolemic patients without overt coronary stenosis. Circulation 94:3232–3238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M, Rosenspire KC, Krivokapich J, Schelbert H, Kuhl DE (1990) Noninvasive quantification of regional blood flow in the human heart using N-13 ammonia and dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:1032–1042

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Yap JT, Rimoldi O, Camici PG (1999) Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with oxygen-15 labeled water and PET. J Nucl Med 40:1848–1856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomiyama T, Ishihara K, Suda M et al (2015) Impact of time-of-flight on qualitative and quantitative analyses of myocardial perfusion PET studies using 13N-ammonia. J Nucl Cardiol 22:998–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomiyama T, Kumita S, Ishihara K et al (2015) Patients with reduced heart rate response to adenosine infusion have low myocardial flow reserve in 13N-ammonia PET studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:1089–1095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Taki J, Fujino S, Nakajima K et al (2001) (99 m) Tc-sestamibi retention characteristics during pharmacologic hyperemia in human myocardium: comparison with coronary flow reserve measured by Doppler flowire. J Nucl Med 42:1457–1463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fukushima Y, Kumita S, Tokita Y, Sato N (2016) Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion SPECT after intravenous bolus administration of Nicorandil in patients with acute ischemic heart failure. J Nucl Med 57:385–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Surti S, Kuhn A, Werner ME, Perkins AE, Kolthammer J, Karp JS (2007) Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. J Nucl Med 48:471–480

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DeGrado TR, Hanson MW, Turkington TG et al (1996) Estimation of myocardial blood flow for longitudinal studies with 13N-labeled ammonia and positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 3:494–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schelbert HR, Phelps ME, Huang SC et al (1981) N-13 ammonia as an indicator of myocardial blood flow. Circulation 63:1259–1272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Loghin C, Sdringola S, Gould KL (2004) Common artifacts in PET myocardial perfusion images due to attenuation-emission misregistration: clinical significance, causes, and solutions. J Nucl Med 45:1029–1039

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwaiger M, Ziegler S, Nekolla SG (2005) PET/CT: challenge for nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Med 46:1664–1678

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alessio AM, Kohlmyer S, Branch K, Chen G, Caldwell J, Kinahan P (2007) Cine CT for attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT. J Nucl Med 48:794–801

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Keiichi Ishihara, MD, PhD, for his helpful discussion and advice. We are also grateful to the radiology technologists Masaya Suda, Koji Kanaya, and Minoru Sakurai for their technical assistance in conducting 13N-ammonia MP-PET.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidenobu Hashimoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived (28-10-655). This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashimoto, H., Fukushima, Y., Kumita, Si. et al. Feasibility of myocardial flow reserve prediction without the use of dynamic data from myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34, 1323–1329 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1335-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1335-z

Keywords

Navigation