Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role of cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute chest pain in the emergency department

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluation of patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department remains a challenging task because of a variety of etiologies that range from benign to potentially fatal. Although majority of patients do not have myocardial ischemia as the cause of their presentation, the clinical work up can be time consuming, costly and inconclusive. Recent technical advances in cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have led to better diagnostic accuracy in evaluating patients with chest pain. In this paper, we review the role of cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating patients with chest pain in the emergency department.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC et al (1987) Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room. Am J Cardiol 60:219–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McCarthy BD, Beshansky JR, D’ Agostino RB, Selker HP (1993) Missed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the emerygency department: results from a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med 22:579–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffmann U, Pena A, Cury R et al (2006) Cardiac CT in emergency department patients with acute chest pain. Radiographics 26:963–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernick PJ et al (2000) The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI. JAMA 284:835–842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW et al (2002) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:1366–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rifkin RD, Parisi AF, Folland E (1979) Coronary calcification in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 44:141–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy JH, Palmer FJ (1974) Incidence and significance of coronary artery calcification. Br Heart J 36:499–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker CR, Kleffel T, Crispin A et al (2001) Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1295–1298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA et al (1995) Coronary artery calcium areas by electron beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area: a histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 92:2157–2162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baumgart D, Schmermund A, Goerge G et al (1997) Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography for detection of coronary atherosclerosis. JACC 30:57–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Budoff MJ, Georgiou D, Brody A et al (1996) Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: a multicenter study. Circulation 93:898–904

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ et al (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rumberger JA, Brundage BH, Rader DJ, Kondos G (1999) Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons. Mayo Clin Proc 74:243–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nasir K, Michos ED, Blumenthal RS et al (2005) Detection of high-risk young adults and women by coronary calcium and National Cholesterol Education Program Panel III guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:1931–1936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haberl R, Becker A, Leber A et al (2001) Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:451–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hecht HS, Budoff MJ, Berman DS, Ehrlich J, Rumberger JA (2006) Coronary artery calcium scanning: clinical paradigms for cardiac risk assessment and treatment. Am Heart J 151:1139–1146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McLaughlin VV, Balogh T, Rich S et al (1999) Utility of electron beam computed tomography to stratify patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain. Am J Cardiol 84:327–328, A8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Laudon DA, Vukov LF, Breen JF et al (1999) Use of electron-beam computed tomography in the evaluation of chest pain patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 33:15–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Georgiou D, Budoff MJ, Kaufer E et al (2001) Screening patients with chest pain in the emergency department using electron beam tomography: a follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:105–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hideya Y, Matthew JB, Bin L et al (2002) Reproducibility of three different scoring systems for measurement of coronary calcium. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 5:391–397

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rubinshtein R, Gasper T, Halon DA et al (2007) Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease among patients with zero or low calcium score undergoing 64-slice cardiac multidetector computed tomography by evaluation of a chest pain syndrome. Am J Cardiol 99:472–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burke AP, Taylor A, Farb A et al (2000) coronary calcification: insights from sudden coronary death victims. Z Kardiol 89(suppl 2):49–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Greenland P, La Bree L, Azen SP et al (2004) Coronary calcium score combined with framingham score for risk reduction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 291:210–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM et al (1999) ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1756–1824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. JACC 46:147–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT et al (2002) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). J Am Coll Cardiol 40:1531–1540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. White CS, Kuo D, Kelemen M et al (2005) chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: Can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation. Am J Radiol 185:533–540

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gallagher MJ, Ross MA, Raff GL (2007) The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med 49:125–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hoffmann U, Nagurney J, Moselewiski F et al (2006) Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 114:2251–2260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldstein J, Gallagher M, O’Neill W et al (2007) A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:863–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubenshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T et al (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 115:1762–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Budoff MJ, Cohen MC, Garcia MJ et al (2005) ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:383–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS et al (2006) Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1840–1845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stephen Amis E, Priscilla FB, Kimberly EA et al (2007) American college of radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 5:272–284

    Google Scholar 

  38. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S et al (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298:317–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Thompson RC, Cullom SJ (2006) Issues regarding radiation dosage of cardiac nuclear and radiography procedures. J Nucl Cardiol 13:19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kwong R, Schussheim A, Rekhraj S et al (2003) Detecting acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 107:531–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS et al (2006) Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1427–1432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1315–1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Roguin A, Zviman MM, Meininger GR et al (2004) Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe. In vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T. Circulation 110:475–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1475–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Suite G035, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA

    Ali Salah, David J. Moliterno & Mushabbar A. Syed

  2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    Roger Humphries

Authors
  1. Ali Salah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David J. Moliterno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roger Humphries
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mushabbar A. Syed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mushabbar A. Syed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salah, A., Moliterno, D.J., Humphries, R. et al. Role of cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute chest pain in the emergency department. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24, 331–342 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-007-9266-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-007-9266-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation