Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying optimal approaches to scale up colorectal cancer screening: an overview of the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC)’s learning laboratory

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Use of recommended screening tests can reduce new colorectal cancers (CRC) and deaths, but screening uptake is suboptimal in the United States (U.S.). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded a second round of the Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) in 2015 to increase screening rates among individuals aged 50–75 years. The 30 state, university, and tribal awardees supported by the CRCCP implement a range of multicomponent interventions targeting health systems that have low CRC screening uptake, including low-income and minority populations. CDC invited a select subset of 16 CRCCP awardees to form a learning laboratory with the goal of performing targeted evaluations to identify optimal approaches to scale-up interventions to increase uptake of CRC screening among vulnerable populations. This commentary provides an overview of the CRCCP learning laboratory, presents findings from the implementation of multicomponent interventions at four FQHCs participating in the learning laboratory, and summarizes key lessons learned on intervention implementation approaches. Lessons learned can support future program implementation to ensure scalability and sustainability of the interventions as well as guide future implementation science and evaluation studies conducted by the CRCCP learning laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. United States Preventive Services Task Force (2016) Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 315(23):2564–2575. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2017) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/index.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2017

  3. Health Resources & Services Administration (2016) National Health Center Data. https://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx?q=t6b&year=2016&state=. Accessed 26 Jan 2018

  4. Seeff LC, DeGroff A, Joseph DA, Royalty J, Tangka FK, Nadel MR, Plescia M (2013) Moving forward: using the experience of the CDCs’ Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program to guide future colorectal cancer programming efforts. Cancer 119(Suppl 15):2940–2946. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Community Preventive Services Task Force (2016) The guide to community preventive services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Community Preventive Services Task Force, Atlanta. https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/cancer-screening-multicomponent-interventions-colorectal-cancer. Accessed 6 Oct 2017

  6. DeGroff A, Sharma K, Satsangi A, Kenney K, Joseph D, Ross K, Leadbetter S, Helsel B, Kammerer B, Firth R, Rockwell T, Short W, Tangka F, Wong F, Richardson L (2018) Implementing evidence-based interventions in U.S. Healthcare Systems to increase colorectal cancer screening: year 1 results of the CDC Colorectal Cancer Control Program. Prev Chronic Dis (Paper Under Review)

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) Guidance for measuring colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in health system clinics. US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/crccp/pdf/Guidance_Measuring_CRC_Screening_Rates.pdf

  8. Subramanian S, Tangka F, Hoover S, Royalty J, DeGroff A, Joseph D (2017) Costs of colorectal cancer screening provision in CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Control Program: comparisons of colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT based screening. Eval Program Plan 62:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tangka F, Subramanian S, Hoover S, Royalty J, Joseph K, DeGroff A, Joseph D, Chattopadhyay S (2017) Costs of promoting cancer screening: evidence from CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP). Eval Program Plan 62:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Health Resources and Services Administration (2018) UDS data comparison. https://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx. Accessed on 7 Jan 2018

  11. Subramanian S, Tangka F, Hoover S, Cole Beebe ME, DeGroff A, Royalty J et al (2013) Costs of planning and implementing federally funded colorectal cancer screening. Cancer 119(Suppl. 15):2855–2862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Trogdon JG, Ekwueme DU, Subramanian S, Crouse W (2014) Economies of scale in federally-funded, state-organized public health programs: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Programs. Health Care Manag Sci 17(4):321–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding support for Sujha Subramanian and Sonja Hoover was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Contract No. 200-2014-61263 Task 4, to RTI International). The provision of data by awardees was supported through funding under a cooperative agreement (DP15-1502) with CDC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florence K. L. Tangka.

Additional information

The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tangka, F.K.L., Subramanian, S., Hoover, S. et al. Identifying optimal approaches to scale up colorectal cancer screening: an overview of the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC)’s learning laboratory. Cancer Causes Control 30, 169–175 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1109-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1109-x

Keywords

Navigation