Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are HPV vaccination services accessible to high-risk communities? A spatial analysis of HPV-associated cancer and Chlamydia rates and safety-net clinics

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

While HPV vaccines can greatly benefit adolescents and young women from high-risk areas, little is known about whether safety-net immunization services are geographically accessible to communities at greatest risk for HPV-associated diseases. We explore the spatial relationship between areas with high HPV risk and proximity to safety-net clinics from an ecologic perspective.

Methods

We used cancer registry data and Chlamydia surveillance data to identify neighborhoods within Los Angeles County with high risk for HPV-associated cancers. We examined proximity to safety-net clinics among neighborhoods with the highest risk. Proximity was measured as the shortest distance between each neighborhood center and the nearest clinic and having a clinic within 3 miles of each neighborhood center.

Results

The average 5-year non-age-adjusted rates were 1,940 cases per 100,000 for Chlamydia and 60 per 100,000 for HPV-associated cancers. A large majority, 349 of 386 neighborhoods with high HPV-associated cancer rates and 532 of 537 neighborhoods with high Chlamydia rates, had a clinic within 3 miles of the neighborhood center. Clinics were more likely to be located within close proximity to high-risk neighborhoods in the inner city. High-risk neighborhoods outside of this urban core area were less likely to be near accessible clinics.

Conclusions

The majority of high-risk neighborhoods were geographically near safety-net clinics with HPV vaccination services. Due to low rates of vaccination, these findings suggest that while services are geographically accessible, additional efforts are needed to improve uptake. Programs aimed to increase awareness about the vaccine and to link underserved groups to vaccination services are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A et al (2013) Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2009, featuring the burden and trends in human papillomavirus(HPV)-associated cancers and HPV vaccination coverage levels. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(3):175–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Human papillomavirus-associated cancers—United States, 2004–2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 61(15):258–261

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freeman HP, Wingrove BK (2005) Excess cervical cancer mortality: a marker for low access to health care in poor communities. National Cancer Institute, Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  4. Horner MJ et al (2011) U.S. geographic distribution of prevaccine era cervical cancer screening, incidence, stage, and mortality. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(4):591–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Krieger N et al (1999) Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988–92 (United States). Cancer Causes Control 10(6):525–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yin D, Morris C, Allen M, Cress R, Bates J, Liu L (2010) Does socioeconomic disparity in cancer incidence vary across racial/ethnic groups? Cancer Causes Control 21(10):1721–1730

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coughlin SS et al (2008) Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Soc Sci Med 66(2):260–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Datta GD et al (2006) Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among U.S. black women: a multilevel analysis. Cancer 106(3):664–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCarthy AM, Dumanovsky T, Visvanathan K, Kahn AR, Schymura MJ (2010) Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in mortality among women diagnosed with cervical cancer in New York City, 1995–2006. Cancer Causes Control 21(10):1645–1655

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schootman M et al (2006) Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities. J Epidemiol Community Health 60(3):202–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh GK, Miller BA (2004) Health, life expectancy, and mortality patterns among immigrant populations in the United States. Can J Public Health 95(3):I14–I21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Benard VB et al (2008) Examining the association between socioeconomic status and potential human papillomavirus-associated cancers. Cancer 113(10 Suppl):2910–2918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Watson M, Saraiya M, Wu X (2009) Update of HPV-associated female genital cancers in the United States, 1999–2004. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 18(11):1731–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Garland SM et al (2007) Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases. N Engl J Med 356(19):1928–1943

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paavonen J et al (2009) Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet 374(9686):301–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. CDC (2007) Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), in MMWR early release 2007, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, pp 1–24

  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations: human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine recommendations. Cited 30 Mar 2013. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/acip-list.htm#hpv

  18. CDC (2012) National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13 through 17 years—United States, 2011, in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. pp 671–677

  19. Brisson M, Drolet M, Malagon T (2013) Inequalities in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers: implications for the success of HPV vaccination. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(3):158–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. CDC (2011) ACIP-VFC vaccine resolutions for vaccines to prevent human papillomavirus. pp 1–2

  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Section 317 Immunization Program. Cited 1 Mar 2012. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/reports/plans/pdf20100610/CDC_Section%20317%20Immunizations%20June%202010.pdf

  22. Bastani R et al (2011) Understanding suboptimal human papillomavirus vaccine uptake among ethnic minority girls. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(7):1463–1472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guerry SL, De Rosa CJ, Markowitz LE, Walker S, Liddon N, Kerndt PR, Gottlieb SL (2011) Human papillomavirus vaccine initiation among adolescent girls in high-risk communities. Vaccine 29(12):2235–2241

    Google Scholar 

  24. Allard SW, Tolman RM, Rosen D (2003) Proximity to service providers and service utilization among welfare recipients: the interaction of place and race. J Policy Anal Manage 22(4):599–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fu LY et al (2009) Spatial accessibility to providers and vaccination compliance among children with medicaid. Pediatrics 124(6):1579–1586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang B et al (2009) Does distance matter? Distance to mammography facilities and stage at diagnosis of breast cancer in Kentucky. J Rural Health 25(4):366–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chao C, Velicer C, Slezak JM, Jacobsen SJ (2010) Correlates for human papillomavirus vaccination of adolescent girls and young women in a managed care organization. Am J Epidemiol 171(3):357–367

    Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor SL et al (2006) ZIP code correlates of HIV-testing: a multi-level analysis in Los Angeles. AIDS Behav 10(5):579–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Teach SJ et al (2006) Spatial accessibility of primary care pediatric services in an urban environment: association with asthma management and outcome. Pediatrics 117(4 Pt 2):S78–S85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guagliardo MF (2004) Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. Int J Health Geogr 3(1):3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McLafferty S, Grady S (2005) Immigration and geographic access to prenatal clinics in Brooklyn, NY: a geographic information systems analysis. Am J Public Health 95(4):638–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharkey JR et al (2009) Association between neighborhood need and spatial access to food stores and fast food restaurants in neighborhoods of colonias. Int J Health Geogr 8:9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cordasco KM et al (2010) English language proficiency and geographical proximity to a safety net clinic as a predictor of health care access. J Immigr Minor Health 13(2):260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gordon-Larsen P et al (2006) Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics 117(2):417–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nykiforuk CI, Flaman LM (2011) Geographic information systems (GIS) for health promotion and public health: a review. Health Promot Pract 12(1):63–73

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zenk SN, Tarlov E, Sun J (2006) Spatial equity in facilities providing low- or no-fee screening mammography in Chicago neighborhoods. J Urban Health 83(2):195–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Du P et al (2010) The roles of social domains, behavioral risk, health care resources, and chlamydia in spatial clusters of US cervical cancer mortality: not all the clusters are the same. Cancer Causes Control 21(10):1669–1683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pruitt SL, Schootman M (2010) Geographic disparity, area poverty, and human papillomavirus vaccination. Am J Prev Med 38(5):525–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Boscoe FP, Ward MH, Reynolds P (2004) Current practices in spatial analysis of cancer data: data characteristics and data sources for geographic studies of cancer. Int J Health Geogr 3(1):28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Diez Roux AV (2001) Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health 91(11):1783–1789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kawachi I, Berkman LF (2003) Neighborhoods and health. Oxford University Press, New York, p 352

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Mobley LR, Kuo TM, Andrews L (2008) How sensitive are multilevel regression findings to defined area of context? A case study of mammography use in California. Med Care Res Rev 65(3):315–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pickett KE, Pearl M (2001) Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health 55(2):111–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Krieger N et al (2002) Zip code caveat: bias due to spatiotemporal mismatches between zip codes and US census-defined geographic areas—the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health 92(7):1100–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kahn JA, Lan D, Kahn RS (2007) Sociodemographic factors associated with high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Obstet Gynecol 110(1):87–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Franceschi S et al (2007) Cervical infection with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women from ten areas in four continents. A cross-sectional study. Sex Transm Dis 34(8):563–569

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lehtinen M et al (2011) Chlamydia trachomatis infection and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Sex Transm Infect 87(5):372–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Madeleine MM et al (2007) Risk of cervical cancer associated with Chlamydia trachomatis antibodies by histology, HPV type and HPV cofactors. Int J Cancer 120(3):650–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. SEER (2009) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2006. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006

  50. Curtis A et al (2011) Confidentiality risks in fine scale aggregations of health data. Comput Environ Urban Syst 35(1):57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. U.S. Census Bureau (2012) American community survey. Cited 10 Mar 2012. Available from: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/about_the_survey/american_community_survey/

  52. U.S. Census Bureau (2008) A compass for understanding and using American community survey data, in US census 2010. Washington, D.C.

  53. Penchansky R, Thomas JW (1981) The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care 19(2):127–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Scott LM, Janikas MV (2010) Handbook of applied spatial analysis spatial statistics in ArcGIS. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kneebone E, Nadeau C, Berube A (2011) The re-emergence of concentrated poverty: metropolitan trends in the 2000s, in Metropolitan Opportunity Series, T.M.P.P.a. Brookings, Editor 2011, The Brookings Institute, Washington D.C.

  56. Silver D, Blustein J, Weitzman BC (2012) Transportation to clinic: findings from a pilot clinic-based survey of low-income suburbanites. J Immigr Minor Health 14(2):350–355

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bednarczyk RA, Birkhead GS (2011) Reducing financial barriers to vaccinating children and adolescents in the USA. Curr Opin Pediatr 23(1):105–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Young JL et al (2011) Human papillomavirus vaccination recommendation may be linked to reimbursement: a survey of Virginia family practitioners and gynecologists. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 24(6):380–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Tsui J, Gee GC, Rodriguez HP, Kominski GF, Glenn BA, Singhal R, Bastani R (2013) Exploring the role of neighborhood socio-demographic factors on HPV vaccine initiation among low-income, ethnic minority girls. J Immigr Minor Health 15(4):732–740

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lau M, Lin H, Flores G (2012) Factors associated with human papillomavirus vaccine-series initiation and healthcare provider recommendation in US adolescent females: 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health. Vaccine 30(20):3112–3118

    Google Scholar 

  61. Vadaparampil ST et al (2011) Missed clinical opportunities: provider recommendations for HPV vaccination for 11–12 year old girls are limited. Vaccine 29(47):8634–8641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kharbanda EO et al (2011) Text message reminders to promote human papillomavirus vaccination. Vaccine 29(14):2537–2541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Tiro JA et al (2012) Multilevel correlates for human papillomavirus vaccination of adolescent girls attending safety net clinics. Vaccine 30(13):2368–2375

    Google Scholar 

  64. Short MB et al (2005) Parental acceptance of adolescent vaccines within school-based health centres. Herpes 12(1):23–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Robitz R et al (2011) Parent attitudes about school requirements for human papillomavirus vaccine in high-risk communities of Los Angeles, California. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(7):1421–1429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Smith PJ et al (2005) The association between having a medical home and vaccination coverage among children eligible for the vaccines for children program. Pediatrics 116(1):130–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Szilagyi PG et al (2008) Delivering adolescent vaccinations in the medical home: a new era? Pediatrics 121(Suppl 1):S15–S24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Krieger N et al (2005) Painting a truer picture of US socioeconomic and racial/ethnic health inequalities: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health 95(2):312–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The analysis for the study was conducted under funding by the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Pre-doctoral Fellowship Grant and the UCLA NIH/NCI R25 Cancer Education and Career Development Program. Jennifer Tsui is currently funded by the NIH/NCI T32 Postdoctoral Research Fellowship program at Columbia University, which supported the completion and submission of this manuscript. We thank Myles Cockburn, Ph.D, for providing the Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program’s geographic data. We also thank our colleagues at the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health’s Sexually Transmitted Disease Program for providing Chlamydia data. We gratefully acknowledge Myles Cockburn, Ph.D and Andrew Rundle, Dr.PH, for their feedback on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Tsui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsui, J., Rodriguez, H.P., Gee, G.C. et al. Are HPV vaccination services accessible to high-risk communities? A spatial analysis of HPV-associated cancer and Chlamydia rates and safety-net clinics. Cancer Causes Control 24, 2089–2098 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0286-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0286-x

Keywords

Navigation