Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing the acceptability of self-sampling for HPV among Haitian immigrant women: CBPR in action

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether pairing self-sampling for HPV with community health workers (CHWs) is a culturally acceptable method for cervical cancer screening among Haitian immigrant women residing in Little Haiti, the predominately Haitian neighborhood in Miami, FL.

Methods

As part of a larger, ongoing community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative in Little Haiti, Haitian CHWs recruited 246 eligible women to this study. Participants provided self-collected cervical specimens for HPV testing and answered a series of questions about their experience with self-sampling for HPV.

Results

The vast majority of women (97.6%) was comfortable using the self-sampler at home, would recommend this screening method to their friends and/or family members (98.4%), and described the sampler as easy to use (95.1%). Additionally, 97% of all self-collected specimens were deemed adequate for HPV testing.

Conclusions

When paired with CHWs, who are of Haitian descent and well respected in Little Haiti, self-sampling is a highly acceptable method of cervical screening for Haitian women in this ethnic enclave. This approach addresses critical access barriers, including poverty, language difficulties, and sociocultural concerns about modesty, that may similarly affect Pap smear utilization among other immigrant or medically underserved population sub-groups. Coupled with generally positive reviews of the device, the low rate of insufficient specimens for testing suggests that this device is promising for use in non-clinical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanghavi Goel M, Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Ngo-Metzger Q, Phillips RS (2003) Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening: the importance of foreign birth as a barrier to care. J Gen Intern Med 18:1028–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Alba I, Hubbell FA, McMullin JM, Weningson JM, Saitz R (2005) Impact of U.S. citizenship status on cancer screening among immigrant women. J Gen Internal Med 20(3):290–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hiatt R, Pasick R, Stewart S, Bloom J, Davis P, Gardiner P et al (2001) Community-based cancer screening for underserved women: design and baseline findings from the Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Study. Prev Med 33(3):190–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman HP, Wingrove BK (2005) Excess cervical cancer mortality: a marker for low access to health care in poor communities. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute, Center to reduce cancer health disparities, May 2005. NIH Pub. No. 05-5282

  5. FCDS (2007) Florida Cancer Data System

  6. CDC CfDCP (2008) Cervical Cancer: Compare by State. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group, Atlanta, GA; 2004 [cited 2008 Nov 17]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cervical/statistics/state.htm

  7. Green EH, Freund KM, Posner MM, David MM (2005) Pap smear rates among Haitian immigrant women in eastern Massachussetts. Public Health Rep 120:133–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fruchter RG, Remy JC, Burnett WS, Boyce JG (1986) Cervical cancer in immigrant Caribbean women. Am J Public Health 76(7):797–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobetz E, Menard J, Barton B, Pierre L, Diem J, Denize Auguste P (2009) Patne en Akyson: addressing cancer disparities in little haiti through research and social action. Am J Public Health 99(7):1163–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. ACOG (2003) Cervical cytology screening. ACOG Practice Bull No 45 102:417–427

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, Moscicki A-B, Smith RA, Eyre HJ et al (2002) American cancer society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA A Cancer J Clin 52:342–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. CDC CfDCP (2008) National center for chronic disease prevention and health promotion: behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Atlanta, GA. 2008. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/

  13. Zéphir F (2004) The Haitian Americans. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press

  14. U.S. Census Bureau (2006) American Fact Finder, Summary File 3. U.S. Bureau of the Census; 2000 [cited 2006 July 17]. Available from: http://www.census.gov

  15. Marmot M, Wilkinson R (eds) (2003) Social determinants of health: the solid facts, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lindau ST, Tomori C, Lyons T, Langseth L, Bennett CL, Garcia P (2002) The association of health literacy with cervical cancer prevention knowledge and health behaviors in a multiethnic cohort of women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(5):938–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Committee on Health Literacy (2004) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. In: Nielsen-bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA (eds) National Academies Press, Washington, DC

  18. Freeman H (2004) Poverty, culture, and social injustice: determinants of cancer disparities. CA A Cancer J Clin 54:72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Adler N, Ostrove J (1999) Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don’t. Ann N Y Acad Sci 896:3–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Irwin A, Valentine N, Brown C, Loewenson R, Solar O et al (2006) The commission on social determinants of health: tackling the social roots of health inequities. PLoS Med 3(6):e106. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saint-Jean G, Crandall LA (2005) Sources and barriers to health care coverage for Haitian immigrants in Miami-Dade County, Florida. J Health Care Poor Underserved 16:29–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Laguerre M (1984) American odyssey: Haitians in New York City. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller NL (2000) Haitian ethnomedical systems and biomedical practitioners: directions for clinicians. J Transcult Nurs 11(3):204–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brodwin PE (1996) Medicine and morality in Haiti: the contest for healing power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  25. Singer M, Davison L, Gerdes G (1988) Culture, critical theory, and reproductive illness behavior in haiti. Med Anthropol Q 2(4):370–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Menard J (2008) The social context of cervical cancer knowledge and prevention among Haitian immigrant women. University of South Florida, Tampa

    Google Scholar 

  27. CDC CfDCP (2008) Medical examinations of aliens (refugees and immigrants). Department of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta; 2008 [cited 2008 Nov 17]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/health.htm

  28. Farmer P (1992) AIDS and accusation: Haiti and the geography of blame. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  29. Colin J, Paperwalla G (1996) Haitians. In: Lipson JG, Dibble SL (eds) Culture and nursing care: a pocket guide. UCSF Nursing Press, San Francisco, pp 139–54

  30. Castle P, Aftab A, Saint-Jean G, Mendez L (2006) Detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus in specimens collected with a novel self-sampling device. J Clin Microbiol 44(6):2158–2159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Minkler M, Wallerstein N (2003) Community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  32. Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E, Becker A, Allen A, Guzman R (2003) Critical issues in developing and following community based research principles. Jossey-Bass, San Franciso, CA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Edgren K, Parker E, Israel B, Lewis T, Salinas M, Robins T et al (2005) Community involvement in the conduct of a health education intervention and research project: community action against asthma. Health Promo Pract 6:263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dzuba I, Díaz EY, Allen B, Leonard YF, Lazcano Ponce EC, Shah KV et al (2002) The acceptability of self-collected samples for HPV testing vs. the Pap test as alternatives in cervical cancer screening. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 11(3):265–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Knesel B, Dry J, Wald-Scott C (2005) Preliminary evaluation of a cervical self-sampling device with liquid-based cytology and multiparameter molecular testing. J Reprod Med 50:256–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nobbenhuis M, Helmerhorst T, van den Brule A, Rozendaal L, Jaspars L, Voorhorst F et al (2002) Primary screening for high risk HPV by home obtained cervicovaginal lavage is an alternative screening tool for unscreened women. J Clin Pathol 55:435–439

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Denny L, Kuhn L, De Souza M, Pollack A, Dupree W, Wright TJ (2005) Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294(17):2173–2181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fairley C, Chen S, Tabrizi S, Quinn M, McNeil J, Garland S (1992) Tampons: a novel patient-administered method for the assessment of genital human papillomavirus infection. J Infect Dis 165:1103–1106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kahn J, Slap G, Huang B, Rosenthal S, Wanchick A, Kollar L et al (2004) Comparison of adolescent and young adult self-collected and clinician-collected samples for human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol 103(5):952–959

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Serwadda D, Wawer M, Shah K, Sweankambo N, Daniel R, Lorincz A et al (1999) Use of a hybrid capture assay of self-collected vaginal swabs in rural Uganda for detection of human papillomavirus. J Infect Dis 180:1316–1319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hillemanns P, Kimmig R, Huttermann U, Dannecker C, Thaler C (1999) Screening for cervical neoplasia by self-assessment for human papillomavirus DNA [letter]. Lancet 354:1970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wright T, Denny L, Kuhn L, Pollack A, Lorincz A (2000) HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer. JAMA 283(1):81–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Moscicki A (1993) Comparison between methods for human papillomavirus DNA testing: a model for self-testing in young women. J Infect Dis 167:723–725

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Harper D, Hildesheim A, Cobb J, Greenberg M, Vaught J, Lorincz A (1999) Collection devices for human papillomavirus. J Fam Pract 48:531–535

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Agorastos T, Dinas K, Lloveras B, Font R, Kornegary J, Bontis J et al (2005) Self-sampling versus physician-sampling for human papillomavirus testing. Int J STDS AIDS 16:727–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. de Alba I, Anton-Culver H, Hubbell FA, Ziogas A, Hess JR, Bracho A et al (2008) Self-sampling for human papillomavirus in a community setting: feasibility in Hispanic women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(8):2163–2168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pengsaa P, Sriamporn S, Kritpetcharat O, Kamsa-Ard S, Suwanrungruang K, Noda S et al (2003) A comparison of cytology with Pap smears taken by a gynecologist and with a self-sampling device. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 4(2):99–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Longatto-Filho A, Roteli-Martins C, Hammes L, Etlinger D, Pereira S, Erzen M et al (2008) Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as cervical cancer screening option. Experience from the LAMS study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 29(4):327–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Karwalajtys T, Howard M, Sellors J, Kaczorowski J (2006) Vaginal self sampling versus physician cervical sampling for HPV among younger and older women. Sex Transm Infect 82(4):337–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bais A, van Kemenade F, Berkhof J, Verheijen R, Snijders P, Voorhorst F et al (2007) Human papillomavirus testing on self-sampled cervicovaginal brushes: an effective alternative to protect nonresponders in cervical screening programs. Int J Cancer 120(7):1505–1510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Barata P, Mai V, Howlett R, Gagliardi A, Stewart D (2008) Discussions about self-obtained samples for HPV testing as an alternative for cervical cancer prevention. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 8:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  52. Boskey E, Atherly-Trim S, O’Campo P, Strobino D, Misra D (2004) Acceptability of a self-sampling technique to collect vaginal smears for gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Women’s Health Issues 14(1):14–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Budge M, Halford J, Haran M, Mein J, Wright G (2005) Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45(3):215–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Castle PE, Aftab A, Saint-Jean G, Mendez L (2006) Detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus in specimens collected with a novel self-sampling device. J Clin Microbiol 44(6):2158–2159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Daponte A, Pournaras S, Mademtzis I, Hadjichristodoulou C, Kostopoulou E, Maniatis A et al (2006) Evaluation of HPV 16 PCR detection in self- compared with clinician-collected samples in women referred for colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol 103(2):463–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Harper D, Noll W, Belloni D, Cole B (2002) Randomized clinical trial of PCR-determined human papillomavirus detection methods: self-sampling versus clinician-directed—biologic concordance and women’s preferences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(3):365–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Knesel BW, Dry JC, Wald-Scott C, Aftoh A (2005) Preliminary evaluation of a cervical self-sampling device with liquid-based cytology and multiparameter molecular testing. J Reprod Med 50(4):256–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Blake DR, Maldeis N, Barnes MR, Hardick A, Quinn TC, Gaydos CA (2008) Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for Chlamydia trachomatis using cervical swabs, urine, and self-obtained vaginal swabs in a sexually transmitted disease clinic setting. Sex Transm Dis 35(7):649–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chandeying V, Garland S, Tabrizi S (2006) Prevalence and typing of human papilloma virus (HPV) among female sex workers and outpatient women in southern Thailand. Sexual Health 3(1):11–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chernesky M, Hook E, Martin D, Lane J, Johnson R, Jordan J et al (2005) Women find it easy and prefer to collect their own vaginal swabs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. Sex Transm Dis 32(12):729–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Saint-Jean G, Crandall LA (2005) Utilization of preventive care by Haitian immigrants in Miami, Florida. J Immigr Health 7(4):283–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Brittany Ashlock, Ty Schwartzlander and Rachel Becker for their various contributions to this project; Drs. Thomas Hooton, Jennifer Hu, and Joseph Lucci, III for their guidance and support; members of Patnè en Aksyon for their commitment to improving the health of Haitian immigrant women in Miami; and our Community Health Workers, Mirlene Jacques and Patricia Dorcius, who made this study possible. This research was funded by a UM/Sylvester Pap Corps Cancer Disparities Grant 2007, a UM Institute for Women’s Health Developmental Research Grant 2008, and the American Cancer Society, grant number MRSGT-07-159-01-CPHPS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin Kobetz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbee, L., Kobetz, E., Menard, J. et al. Assessing the acceptability of self-sampling for HPV among Haitian immigrant women: CBPR in action. Cancer Causes Control 21, 421–431 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9474-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9474-0

Keywords

Navigation