Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Varying Levels of Family History of Breast Cancer in Relation to Mammographic Breast Density (United States)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We examined the relationship between breast cancer family history and mammographic breast density.

Methods

Participants included 35,019 postmenopausal women aged ≥40 years enrolled in a population-based mammography screening program. We collected data on the number and type of 1st and 2nd degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer and their ages at diagnosis. We used the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System™ breast density categories to identify women with fatty (1 = almost entirely fatty or 2 = scattered fibroglandular tissue) and dense (3 = heterogeneously dense or 4 = extremely dense) breasts. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals for dense (N = 18,111) compared to fatty breasts (N = 16,908).

Results

The odds of having dense breasts were 17% greater for women with affected 1st degree relatives than women with no family history. The odds increased with more affected 1st degree relatives [≥3 vs. none (OR = 1.46; 1.05–2.01)] and among women with ≥1 affected 1st degree relative diagnosed <50 years (OR = 1.22; 1.10–1.34).

Conclusions

Having a family history of breast cancer was more strongly associated with mammographic breast density when the affected relatives were more genetically similar. There may be common, yet undiscovered, genetic elements that affect breast cancer and mammographic breast density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

BCSP:

Breast Cancer Screening Program

BI-RADS™:

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System™

GHC:

Group Health Cooperative

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. K Kerlikowske D Grady J Barclay EA Sickles V Ernster (1996) ArticleTitleEffect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography JAMA 276 IssueID1 33–38 Occurrence Handle8667536 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283ptVeqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.276.1.33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. MT Mandelson N Oestreicher PL Porter D White CA Finder SH Taplin et al. (2000) ArticleTitleBreast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 IssueID13 1081–1087 Occurrence Handle10880551 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvivFyrtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. NF Boyd HM Jensen G Cooke HL Han GA Lockwood AB Miller (2000) ArticleTitleMammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study Eur J Cancer Prev 9 IssueID1 15–24 Occurrence Handle10777006 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3js1Oltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00008469-200002000-00003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. YP Guo LJ Martin W Hanna D Banerjee N Miller E Fishell et al. (2001) ArticleTitleGrowth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10 IssueID3 243–248 Occurrence Handle11303594 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjtVWmsbg%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C Byrne GA Colditz WC Willett FE Speizer M Pollak SE Hankinson (2000) ArticleTitlePlasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding protein 3, and mammographic density Cancer Res 60 IssueID14 3744–3748 Occurrence Handle10919644 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXlt1Gktrs%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. NF Boyd J Stone LJ Martin R Jong E Fishell M Yaffe et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe association of breast mitogens with mammographic densities Br J Cancer 87 IssueID8 876–882 Occurrence Handle12373602 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nhsFegsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1038/sj.bjc.6600537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S Alowami S Troup S Al-Haddad I Kirkpatrick PH Watson (2003) ArticleTitleMammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression Breast Cancer Res 5 IssueID5 R129–R135 Occurrence Handle12927043 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXntFaksb4%3D Occurrence Handle10.1186/bcr622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. JA Harvey VE Bovbjerg (2004) ArticleTitleQuantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk Radiology 230 IssueID1 29–41 Occurrence Handle14617762

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. CM Vachon CC Kuni K Anderson VE Anderson TA Sellers (2000) ArticleTitleAssociation of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States) Cancer Causes Control 11 IssueID7 653–662 Occurrence Handle10977110 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ht1CrtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008926607428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. JA Knight LJ Martin CV Greenberg GA Lockwood JW Byng MJ Yaffe et al. (1999) ArticleTitleMacronutrient intake and change in mammographic density at menopause: results from a randomized trial Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8 IssueID2 123–128 Occurrence Handle10067809 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7msFWgsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J Brisson R Verreault AS Morrison S Tennina F Meyer (1989) ArticleTitleDiet, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk Am J Epidemiol 130 IssueID1 14–24 Occurrence Handle2545096 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1MzgtVOitw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. CM Rutter MT Mandelson MB Laya DJ Seger S Taplin (2001) ArticleTitleChanges in breast density associated with initiation, discontinuation, and continuing use of hormone replacement therapy JAMA 285 IssueID2 171–176 Occurrence Handle11176809 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ks12juw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.285.2.171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. PB Lam PM Vacek BM Geller HB Muss (2000) ArticleTitleThe association of increased weight, body mass index, and tissue density with the risk of breast carcinoma in Vermont Cancer 89 IssueID2 369–375 Occurrence Handle10918168 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czptlSisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2<369::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO;2-J

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. CA Haiman L Bernstein D Berg SA Ingles M Salane G Ursin (2002) ArticleTitleGenetic determinants of mammographic density Breast Cancer Res 4 IssueID3 R5 Occurrence Handle12052257 Occurrence Handle10.1186/bcr434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. G Maskarinec G Lurie AE Williams L Le Marchand (2004) ArticleTitleAn investigation of mammographic density and gene variants in healthy women Int J Cancer 112 IssueID4 683–688 Occurrence Handle15382051 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXptlGjtrk%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/ijc.20448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. CC Hong HJ Thompson C Jiang GL Hammond D Tritchler M Yaffe et al. (2003) ArticleTitleVal158Met polymorphism in catechol-O-methyltransferase gene associated with risk factors for breast cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12 IssueID9 838–847 Occurrence Handle14504192 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXnsValtrg%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. AM Dunning CS Healey PD Pharoah MD Teare BA Ponder DF Easton (1999) ArticleTitleA systematic review of genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8 IssueID10 843–854 Occurrence Handle10548311 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXns1CrtLw%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. E Ziv J Shepherd R Smith-Bindman K Kerlikowske (2003) ArticleTitleMammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 95 IssueID7 556–558 Occurrence Handle12671024 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jnci/95.7.556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. SH Taplin RS Thompson F Schnitzer C Anderman V Immanuel (1990) ArticleTitleRevisions in the risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Program at Group Health Cooperative Cancer 66 IssueID4 812–818 Occurrence Handle2386908 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3czlt1GitA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. SH Taplin MT Mandelson C Anderman E White RS Thompson D Timlin et al. (1997) ArticleTitleMammography diffusion and trends in late-stage breast cancer: evaluating outcomes in a population Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6 IssueID8 625–631 Occurrence Handle9264276 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2svgslGhtQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. SH Taplin L Ichikawa DS Buist D Seger E White (2004) ArticleTitleEvaluating organized breast cancer screening implementation: the prevention of late-stage disease? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13 IssueID2 225–234 Occurrence Handle14973097 Occurrence Handle10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-03-0206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. LW Bassett SA Feig VP Jackson DB Kopans MN Linver EA Sickles et al. (1998) American college of radiology (ACR) breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS™) EditionNumber3 American College of Radiology Reston (VA)

    Google Scholar 

  23. NF Boyd GS Dite J Stone A Gunasekara DR English MR McCredie et al. (2002) ArticleTitleHeritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer N Engl J Med 347 IssueID12 886–894 Occurrence Handle12239257 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa013390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. CC Hong BK Tang V Rao S Agarwal L Martin D Tritchler et al. (2004) ArticleTitleCytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) activity, mammographic density, and oxidative stress: a cross-sectional study Breast Cancer Res 6 IssueID4 R338–R351 Occurrence Handle15217501 Occurrence Handle10.1186/bcr797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. CA Haiman SE Hankinson I Vivo ParticleDe C Guillemette N Ishibe DJ Hunter et al. (2003) ArticleTitlePolymorphisms in steroid hormone pathway genes and mammographic density Breast Cancer Res Treat 77 IssueID1 27–36 Occurrence Handle12602902 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XovVClt7g%3D Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021112121782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. WA Berg C Campassi P Langenberg MJ Sexton (2000) ArticleTitleBreast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 IssueID6 1769–1777 Occurrence Handle10845521 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czgt1Wgsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. JW Byng MJ Yaffe RA Jong RS Shumak GA Lockwood DL Tritchler et al. (1998) ArticleTitleAnalysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms Radiographics 18 IssueID6 1587–1588 Occurrence Handle9821201 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FjvVKnsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. AY El-Bastawissi E White MT Mandelson S Taplin (2001) ArticleTitleVariation in mammographic breast density by race Ann Epidemiol 11 IssueID4 257–263 Occurrence Handle11306344 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzntVansA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00225-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. IJ Hall W Burke S Coughlin NC Lee (2001) ArticleTitlePopulation-based estimates of the prevalence of family history of cancer among women Community Genet 4 IssueID3 134–142 Occurrence Handle14960905 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2FntF2ktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1159/000051173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. KS Hughes C Roche CT Campbell N Siegel L Salisbury A Chekos et al. (2003) ArticleTitlePrevalence of family history of breast and ovarian cancer in a single primary care practice using a self-administered questionnaire Breast J 9 IssueID1 19–25 Occurrence Handle12558666 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09105.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Anthony B. Crest

  2. Group Health Cooperative, Center for Health Studies, 1730 Minor Ave Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA

    Erin J. Aiello, Melissa L. Anderson & Diana S. M. Buist

  3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Diana S. M. Buist

Authors
  1. Anthony B. Crest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erin J. Aiello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Melissa L. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Diana S. M. Buist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin J. Aiello.

Additional information

Financial Support: This study was supported by grant CA063731 from the National Cancer Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crest, A.B., Aiello, E.J., Anderson, M.L. et al. Varying Levels of Family History of Breast Cancer in Relation to Mammographic Breast Density (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17, 843–850 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0026-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0026-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation