Skip to main content
Log in

The Differential Influence of Identification on Ethical Judgment: The Role of Brand Love

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As negative information about companies becomes widely available and spreads rapidly through digital communications, understanding consumer reactions to these events and how human perceptions are shaped becomes increasingly important. In this paper, we investigate how consumers’ identification with brands and their love for them affect their support for the brand during extremely unethical (negative) situations. The results indicate that brand identification both decreases (direct effect) and increases (indirect effect through brand love) consumers’ ethical judgment following extremely unethical events. Moreover, we find that consumers who are in a love type relationship with the brand proactively shield the brand from other consumers by employing two brand supportive behaviors; sin of omission and brand defense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank two anonymous reviewers for suggesting these interesting long-term effects.

References

  • Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, N., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florence, P. (2013). Brand passion: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 904–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Reed, A., II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Batra, R., & Ahuvia, A. (2017). Brand love: Development and validation of a practical scale. Marketing Letters, 28(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, 1, 45–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R., Peacock, J., & Fetscherin, M. (2015). The power of brand love. International Journal of Market Research, 57(5), 669–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. H., & Karson, M. J. (1987). Personal values and business decisions: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(5), 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., Ahuvia, A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2012). Brand love. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H., Heinrich, D., & Albrecht, C. M. (2009). All you need is love: Assessing consumers’ brand love. In Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Summer Educators conference (pp. 252–253). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

  • Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, A. (2003). Towards a critique of brand relationships. NA-Advances in Consumer Research, 30, 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1993). Structural equation models as nonlinear regression models. In K. Haagen, D. J. Bartholomew, & M. Deistler (Eds.), Statistical modeling and latent variables (pp. 51–64). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist, L., & Bech-Larsen, T. (2010). Two studies of consequences and actionable antecedents of brand love. Journal of Brand Management, 17(7), 504–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1996). An alternative two stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable equations. Psychometrika, 61(1), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (2012). Instrumental variables in sociology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 37–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunk, K. H. (2012). Un/ethical company and brand perceptions: Conceptualising and operationalising consumer meanings. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 551–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S., Daniel, R. M., Butterworth, A. S., Thompson, S. G., & EPIC-InterAct Consortium. (2014). Network Mendelian randomization: Using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(2), 484–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, B. A., & Ahuvia, A. C. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, 17(2), 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, L. N., & Roedder John, D. (2005). The development of self-brand connections in children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, R. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cojuharenco, I., & Squera, F. (2015). When empathic concern and perspective taking matter for ethical judgment: The role of time hurriedness. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 717–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham, J. (1986). Partiality, favouritism and morality. The Philosophical Quarterly, 36(144), 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currás-Pérez, R., Bigné-Alcañiz, E., & Alvarado-Herrera, A. (2009). The role of self-definitional principles in consumer identification with a socially responsible company. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Matos, C. A., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2008). Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 578–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., & Tannenbaum, D. (2009). Motivated moral reasoning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, 307–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East, R., Hammond, K., & Wright, M. (2007). The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi-category study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(2), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einwiller, S. A., Fedorikhin, A., Johnson, A. R., & Kamins, M. A. (2006). Enough is enough! When identification no longer prevents negative corporate associations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetscherin, M., Boulanger, M., Gonçalves Filho, C., & Quiroga Souki, G. (2014). The effect of product category on consumer brand relationships. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(2), 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegner, S. M., Hegner, S. M., Fenko, A., Fenko, A., Teravest, A., & Teravest, A. (2017). Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand brand love. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(1), 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, R., Rosenbaum, P. R., & Small, D. S. (2009). Split samples and design sensitivity in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104(487), 1090–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, F., Meyer, F., & Schmid, D. A. (2015). Brand love in progress—The interdependence of brand love antecedents in consideration of relationship duration. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(6), 567–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, F., Vollhardt, K., Matthes, I., & Vogel, J. (2010). Brand misconduct: Consequences on consumer–brand relationships. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1113–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, S. (2014). Lovers and haters divided by Apple. http://www.theleader.com.au/story/2556871/lovers-and-haters-divided-by-apple/. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

  • Iacobucci, D. (2009). Everything you always wanted to know about SEM (structural equation modeling) but were afraid to ask. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(4), 673–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R., Skinner, S. J., & Taylor, V. A. (2005). Consumers’ evaluation of unethical marketing behaviors: The role of customer commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javed, M., Roy, S., & Mansoor, B. (2015). Will you defend your loved brand? In M. Fetscherin & T. Heilmann (Eds.), Consumer brand relationships (pp. 31–54). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1997). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. M., Conlon, D. E., Humphrey, S. E., & Moon, H. (2011). The consequences of completion: How level of completion influences information concealment by decision makers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 401–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiser, S. B., Sivadas, E., Kellaris, J. J., & Dahlstrom, R. F. (2003). Ethical ideologies: Efficient assessment and influence on ethical judgements of marketing practices. Psychology and Marketing, 20(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuenzel, Sven, & Halliday, Sue Vaux. (2010). The chain of effects from reputation and brand personality congruence to brand loyalty: The role of brand identification. Journal of Targetting, Measurement and Analysis of Marketing, 18, 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Mullins, R., Hayati, B., & Schillewaert, N. (2013). Exploring the dynamics of antecedents to consumer–brand identification with a new brand. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 234–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langner, T., Bruns, D., Fischer, A., & Rossiter, J. R. (2016). Falling in love with brands: A dynamic analysis of the trajectories of brand love. Marketing Letters, 27(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisjak, M., Lee, A. Y., & Gardner, W. L. (2012). When a threat to the brand is a threat to the self the importance of brand identification and implicit self-esteem in predicting defensiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9), 1120–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. C., Wang, C. Y., & Wu, L. W. (2010). Moderators of the negativity effect: Commitment, identification, and consumer sensitivity to corporate social performance. Psychology & Marketing, 27(1), 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long-Tolbert, S. J., & Gammoh, B. S. (2012). In good and bad times: The interpersonal nature of brand love in service relationships. Journal of Services Marketing, 26(6), 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, W. J. (2005). Married to the brand: Why consumers bond with some brands for life. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2007). The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, J., & Mishra, D. P. (2010). Analyzing the relationship between dependent and independent variables in marketing: A comparison of multiple regression with path analysis. Innovative Marketing, 6(3), 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizarro, D. A., & Helzer, E. G. (2010). Stubborn moralism and freedom of the will. In R. F. Baumeister, A. R. Mele, & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Free will and consciousness: How might they work (pp. 102–120). Oxford University Press.

  • Pizarro, D. A., & Tannenbaum, D. (2011). Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame. In P. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 91–108). APA Books.

  • Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, J. K., & Burris, C. T. (2005). Let me count the ways: An integrative theory of love and hate. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D. P., & Reidenbach, R. E. (1987). Social responsibility, ethics, and marketing strategy: Closing the gap between concept and application. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Román, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2008). The perceptions of consumers regarding online retailers’ ethics and their relationship with consumers’ general internet expertise and word of mouth: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 641–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, A. (2014). Brand love in emerging market: A qualitative investigation. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 17(4), 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, A., Ponnam, A., & Murthy, B. K. (2012). Understanding and measuring romantic brand love. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 11(4), 324–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalz, S., & Orth, U. R. (2012). Brand attachment and consumer emotional response to unethical firm behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 29(11), 869–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shook, C. L., Ketchen, D. J., Hult, G. T. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2004). An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, J. R., & Pan, Y. (2010). Ethical judgments in business ethics research: Definition, and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 405–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2008). Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: Receiver perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 42(3/4), 344–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Park, C. W. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trump, R. K. (2014). Connected consumers’ responses to negative brand actions: The roles of transgression self-relevance and domain. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1824–1830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuškej, U., Golob, U., & Podnar, K. (2013). The role of consumer–brand identification in building brand relationships. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, R., Bond, E., & Baer, R. (2001). Building service brands via social identity: Lessons from the sports marketplace. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, J. D. (1999). Love as a moral emotion. Ethics, 109(2), 338–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, E., Buil, I., & de Chernatony, L. (2014). Consumer engagement with self-expressive brands: Brand love and WOM outcomes. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(1), 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 258–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, J. S., Brach, S., Cronin, J. J., & Bonn, M. (2016). Symbolic drivers of consumer–brand identification and disidentification. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 785–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, J. S., & Cronin, J. J. (2016). Re-conceptualizing cognitive and affective customer–company identification: The role of self-motives and different customer-based outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarantonello, L., Formisano, M., & Grappi, S. (2016). The relationship between brand love and actual brand performance: Evidence from an international study. International Marketing Review, 33(6), 806–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Deniz Dalman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 8.

Table 8 Results of discriminant validity between the sin of omission and the negative word of mouth

Appendix 2

See Table 9.

Table 9 Results of comparison between proposed model with rival model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalman, M.D., Buche, M.W. & Min, J. The Differential Influence of Identification on Ethical Judgment: The Role of Brand Love. J Bus Ethics 158, 875–891 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3774-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3774-1

Keywords

Navigation