Skip to main content
Log in

The Self-Deceived Consumer: Women’s Emotional and Attitudinal Reactions to the Airbrushed Thin Ideal in the Absence Versus Presence of Disclaimers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of airbrushed “thin ideal” models in advertising creates major ethical challenges: This practice deceives consumers and can be harmful to their emotional state. To inform consumers they are being deceived and reduce these negative adverse effects, disclaimers can state that the images have been digitally altered and are unrealistic. However, recent research shows that such disclaimers have very limited impact on viewers. This surprising result needs further investigation to understand how women who detect that images have been airbrushed are still harmed by them. Three studies reported in this article address this question. The authors identify a typology, based on a combination of three emotional reactions experienced by women who are exposed to the airbrushed thin ideal. In further analyses, they investigate how detection of airbrushing—whether spontaneous or with the help of a disclaimer—relates to these emotional reactions and women’s attitudes to altered images. Results show that detection of airbrushing does not systematically protect women from either wanting to look like airbrushed thin models or the negative emotions triggered by exposure to thin ideal images, nor does it always generate defensive reactions toward ads using such images. Women who detect that images have been airbrushed may still process these images as realistic. In addition to discussing this irrational process of self-deception, this article suggests policy interventions to prevent it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For continuous variables, it is recommended to perform a hierarchical cluster analysis first, using Ward’s method, and then use the results generated from this as input for the k-means method (Janssens et al. 2008).

  2. Results of Study 2 indicate that Age and BMI are potential moderators. Because the pattern of results does not change when these two variables are controlled in Study 3, the analyses reported do not include age and BMI as control variables.

References

  • Ata, R. N., Thompson, J. K., & Small, B. J. (2013). Effects of exposure to thin-ideal media images on body dissatisfaction: Testing the inclusion of a disclaimer versus warning label. Body Image, 10(4), 472–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., & Holbrook, M. B. (1990). Developing a typology of affective responses to advertising. Psychology and Marketing, 7(1), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1986). Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 234–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2016). London mayor plans negative body image advert ban on Tube, buses and trains. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-36516378 on 25th October 2016.

  • Bishop, J. D. (2000). Is self-identity image advertising ethical? Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(2), 371–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borau, S., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2016). The advertising performance of non-ideal female models as a function of viewers’ body mass index: A moderated mediation analysis of two competing affective pathways. International Journal of Advertising, 1–20. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02650487.2015.1135773.

  • Bower, A. B. (2001). Highly attractive models in advertising and the women who loathe them: The Implications of negative affect for spokesperson effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, V., Ameline, N., Beaudouin, P., Bignon, J., Blum, R., Bouchet, J. C., et al. (2009). Proposed law on photographs of retouched body images. Retrieved from http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/propositions/pion1908.asp on 25th October 2016.

  • Brenkert, G. G. (2008). Marketing ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bury, B., Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2014). Directing gaze: The effect of disclaimer labels on women’s visual attention to fashion magazine advertisements. Body Image, 11(4), 357–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bury, B., Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2016a). The effect of digital alteration disclaimer labels on social comparison and body image: Instructions and individual differences. Body Image, 17, 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bury, B., Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2016b). Disclaimer labels on fashion magazine advertisements: Impact on visual attention and relationship with body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 16, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S., & Mussap, A. J. (2007). Emotional reactions following exposure to idealized bodies predict unhealthy body change attitudes and behaviors in women and men. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 62(6), 631–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, J. E., & Ringold, D. J. (1994). The 70% majority: Enduring consumer beliefs about advertising. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13, 228–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chance, Z., & Norton, M. I. (2015). The what and why of self-deception. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 104–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohan, J. A. (2001). Towards a new paradigm in the ethics of woman’s advertising. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. New York, NY: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, A. W., Loureiro, Y. K., Wood, S., & Vendemia, J. M. C. (2012). Suspicious minds: Exploring neural processes during exposure to deceptive advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(3), 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darke, P. R., Ashworth, L., & Main, K. J. (2010). Great expectations and broken promises: Misleading claims, product failure, expectancy disconfirmation and consumer distrust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darke, P. R., & Ritchie, R. J. (2007). The defensive consumer: Advertising deception, defensive processing, and distrust. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H., Halliwell, E., & Stirling, E. (2009). Understanding the impact of thin media models on women’s body-focused affect: The roles of thin-ideal internalization and weight-related self-discrepancy activation in experimental exposure effects. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 43–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, K. C. (2012). Vanity Fare: The cost, controversy, and art of fashion advertisement retouching. Notre Dame Journal of Law Ethics and Public Policy, 26(2), 581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, L. (2002). Get real! Cultural relevance and resistance to the mediated feminine ideal. Psychology and Marketing, 19(2), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edell, J. A., & Burke, M. C. (1987). The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J., Winegard, B., & Winegard, B. M. (2011). Who is the fairest one of all? How evolution guides peer and media influences on female body dissatisfaction. Review of General Psychology, 15(1), 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Harney, M. B., Koehler, L. G., Danzi, L. E., Riddell, M. K., & Bardone-Cone, A. M. (2012). Explaining the relation between thin ideal internalization and body dissatisfaction among college women: The roles of social comparison and body surveillance. Body Image, 9(1), 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., Sandhu, G., Scott, T., & Akbari, Y. (2016). Reducing the negative effects of media exposure on body image: Testing the effectiveness of subvertising and disclaimer labels. Body Image, 17, 171–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, M. (2012). Israel requires advertisers to disclose photoshopping of models. Retrieved from http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/05/israel-requires-advertisers-to-disclose-photoshopping-of-models/ on 25th October 2016.

  • Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, M. (2009). Responsible ads: A workable ideal. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, M. R., Tansey, R., & Clark, J. W. (1994). Research on advertising ethics: Past, present, and future. Journal of Advertising, 23(3), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, W., De Pelsmacker, P., Wijnen, K., & Van Kenhove, P. (2008). Marketing research with SPSS. London: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyrousi, A. G., Panigyrakis, G. G., & Panopoulos, A. P. (2016). Attitudes toward ads portraying women in decorative roles and female competition: An evolutionary psychology perspective. International Journal of Advertising, 35(5), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laros, F. J., & Steenkamp, J. E. (2005). Emotions in consumer behavior: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1437–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauria, F., Preissmann, D., & Clément, F. (2016). Self-deception as affective coping. An empirical perspective on philosophical issues. Consciousness and Cognition, 41, 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. L., & Yeh, J. T. (2009). Comparing society’s awareness of women: Media-portrayed idealized images and physical attractiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubitz (2015) France passes law requiring companies to admit when models have been Photoshopped. Retrieved from https://mic.com/articles/130789/france-passes-law-requiring-companies-to-admit-when-models-have-been-photoshopped#.I6qGoLwtX on 25th October 2016.

  • Madden, T. J., Allen, C. T., & Twible, J. L. (1988). Attitude toward the ad: An assessment of diverse measurement indices under different processing ‘sets’. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(3), 242–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S. J., Goldsmith, R. E., & Banzhaf, E. J. (1998). The effect of misleading environmental claims on consumer perceptions of advertisements. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(2), 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paraskeva, N., Lewis-Smith, H., & Diedrichs, P. C. (2015). Consumer opinion on social policy approaches to promoting positive body image: Airbrushed media images and disclaimer labels. Journal of Health Psychology. doi:10.1177/1359105315597052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, S. J. (2015). Social policy and prevention. In L. Smolak & M. Levine (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of eating disorders (pp. 655–668). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. T. (1987). Bulimia and anorexia in an advertising context. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(6), 495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posavac, H. D., Posavac, S. S., Weigel, R. G., & Simon, W. (2001). Reducing the impact of media images on women at risk for body image disturbance: Three targeted interventions. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20(3), 324–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(1), 56–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riquelme, I. P., & Román, S. (2014). The influence of consumers’ cognitive and psychographic traits on perceived deception: A comparison between online and offline retailing contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollero, C. (2015). “I Know You Are Not Real”: Salience of photo retouching reduces the negative effects of media exposure via internalization. Studia Psychologica, 57(3), 195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romani, S. (2006). Price misleading advertising: Effects on trustworthiness toward the source of information and willingness to buy. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 15(2), 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selimbegovíc, L., & Chatard, A. (2015). Single exposure to disclaimers on airbrushed thin ideal images increases negative thought accessibility. Body Image, 12, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Conner, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, B., Perdue, L., Peterson, L., & Kelly, E. (1986). The role of the mass media in promoting a thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women. Sex Roles, 14(9), 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, A., Tiggemann, M., Firth, B., & Hawkins, K. (2012). Reality check: An experimental investigation of the addition of warning labels to fashion magazine images on women’s mood and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, B. L., Henderson, A., & Zivian, M. T. (1999). Gender differences in population versus media body sizes: A comparison over four decades. Sex Roles, 40, 545–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurgin, E. W. (2003). What’s wrong with computer-generated images of perfection in advertising? Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, E. J., Wilson, A. E., Cressman, K. E., & Buote, V. M. (2006). Comparing to perfection: How cultural norms for appearance affect social comparisons and self-image. Body Image, 3(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telegraph. (2009). French MPs want health warnings on airbrushed photographs. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/6214168/French-MPs-want-health-warnings-on-airbrushed-photographs.html on 25th October 2016.

  • Telegraph. (2015). French MPs pass a law making it illegal to employ unhealthily thin women or Photoshop images without stating it clearly. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11514613/France-divides-the-fashion-world-by-banning-skinny-models.html on 25th October 2016.

  • Tiggemann, M. (2011). Sociocultural perspectives on human appearance and body image. Body Image: A Handbook of Science, Practice, and Prevention, 2, 12–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., Slater, A., Bury, B., Hawkins, K., & Firth, B. (2013). Disclaimer labels on fashion magazine advertisements: Effects on social comparison and body dissatisfaction. Body Image: An International Journal of Research, 10, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., Slater, A., & Smyth, V. (2014). ‘Retouch free’: The effect of labelling media images as not digitally altered on women’s body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 11(1), 85–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368, 1631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, D. S. (2015). Photoshop and deceptive advertising: An analysis of blog comments. Studies in Media and Communication, 3(1), 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wible, A. (2011). It’s all on sale: Marketing ethics and the perpetually fooled. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(S1), 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, S., Beckenuyte, C., & Butt, M. M. (2016). Consumers’ behavioural intentions after experiencing deception or cognitive dissonance caused by deceptive packaging, package downsizing or slack filling. European Journal of Marketing, 50(1/2), 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilksch, S. M., & Wade, T. D. (2009). Reduction of shape and weight concern in young adolescents: A 30-month controlled evaluation of a media literacy program. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(6), 652–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P., & Aaker, J. L. (2002). Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist? Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 636–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, M. A., Gray, J. J., Mosimann, J. E., & Ahrens, A. H. (1992). Cultural expectations of thinness in women: An update. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 11(1), 85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, G.-X., Madrigal, R., & Boush, D. M. (2015). Disentangling the effects of perceived deception and anticipated harm on consumer responses to deceptive advertising. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvie Borau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

The self-deceived consumer: women’s emotional and attitudinal reactions to the airbrushed thin ideal in the absence versus presence of disclaimers.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Respondent Profiles (Study 1)

Name

Age

Description

Léa

25

Housewife, 1 child

Clara

25

Sales administrator

Corinne

29

Recruitment manager

Aurélie

29

Research analyst

Emma

31

Recruitment manager, 1 child

Stéphanie

32

Social worker, 1 child

Camille

32

Manager of an association, 1 child

Chloë

32

Unemployed, 1 child

Audrey

32

Senior manager

Coralie

32

Merchandiser

Tamara

33

Housewife, 2 children

Laetitia

34

Freelancer, 2 children

Emilie

34

Housewife, 2 children

Karine

35

Sound engineer, 1 child

Vanessa

35

Professor

Laurence

36

Artist

Isabelle

36

Unemployed

Florence

37

Nanny

Patricia

40

Secretary, 3 children

Brigitte

40

Analyst

Gislaine

43

Personal assistant, 2 children

Soraya

45

Switchboard operator

  1. To preserve respondents’ anonymity, first names have been modified

Appendix 2: Items Used for the Exploratory Factor Analysis in the Pre-test Phase—Emotions Toward the Airbrushed Thin Ideal Model

Pleasure

Aversion

Displeasure

Pleasant surprise

Unpleasant surprise

Sadnessa

Joy

Annoyancea

Concerna

Curiositya

Disgust

Stressa

Delight

Angera

Jealousy

Enthusiasm

 

Guilt

Funa

 

Discomforta

Well-being

 

Depression

Admirationa

 

Regret

Sympathya

 

Resignationa

Reliefa

 

Frustration

Interesta

 

Shame

  

Feara

Boredoma

  1. aItems excluded after factor analysis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borau, S., Nepomuceno, M.V. The Self-Deceived Consumer: Women’s Emotional and Attitudinal Reactions to the Airbrushed Thin Ideal in the Absence Versus Presence of Disclaimers. J Bus Ethics 154, 325–340 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3413-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3413-2

Keywords

Navigation