Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationships Between Machiavellianism, Organizational Culture, and Workplace Bullying: Emotional Abuse from the Target’s and the Perpetrator’s Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exposure to bullying at work is a serious social stressor, having important consequences for the victim, the co-workers, and the whole organization. Bullying can be understood as a multi-causal phenomenon: the result of individual differences between workers, deficiencies in the work environment or an interaction between individual and situational factors. The results of the previous studies confirmed that some characteristics within an individual may predispose to bullying others and/or being bullied. In the present study, we intend to clarify the relationships between workplace bullying considered from the victim’s and the perpetrator’s points of view, the employee Machiavellianism as a personality factor and the perceptions of organizational culture as depicted by Cameron and Quinn. The sample consisted of 117 workers, employed in different organizations in Poland. The empirical data regarding both being exposed to bullying as well as being a perpetrator of bullying were obtained by the use of self-reports from participants. According to the expectations, Machiavellianism predicted involvement in bullying others. The groups of bullies and bully-victims had a higher Machiavellianism level compared to the groups of victims and persons non-involved in bullying. The results showed that being bullied was negatively related to the perceptions of clan and adhocracy cultures and positively related to the perceptions of hierarchy culture. The results of a moderated regression analysis demonstrated that Machiavellianism was a significant moderator of the relationships between the perceptions of adhocracy and hierarchy cultures and being bullied. Theoretical and practical implications of the results were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Agervold, M. (2009). The significance of organizational factors for the incidence of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(3), 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreou, E. (2004). Bully/victim problems and their association with Machiavellianism and self-efficacy in Greek primary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimizations in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1023–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, K., Barnett, T., & Brown, G. (1999). Individual difference variables, ethical judgments, and ethical behavioral intentions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2), 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baughman, H. M., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. (2012). Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 571–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 998–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (2005). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomczyński, P. (2008). Mobbing w pracy z perspektywy interakcjonalnej. Proces stawania się ofiarą. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudzicka, A., & Makselon-Kowalska, B. (2004). Zachowania nieetyczne w środowisku pracy. In K. Popiolek (Ed.), Kryzysy, katastrofy, kataklizmy. Zjawiska współczesnej cywilizacji, (pp. 232–244). Poznań: Stowarzyszenie Psychologia i Architektura.

  • Corzine, J. B., & Hozier, G. C. (2005). Exploratory study of Machiavellianism and bases of social power in bankers. Psychological Reports, 97(2), 356–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I., Seigne, E., & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). Work engagement and Machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derczyński, W. (2002). Szykany w miejscu pracy. Komunikat z badań. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draheim, S. E. (2004). Makiaweliczna osobowość niepełnoletniego świadka. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, H., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace, International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glasø, L., Matthiesen, S. B., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzesiuk, L. (2008). Mobbing w miejscu pracy—czynniki ryzyka i konsekwencje. In J. Brzeziński, & M. Cierpiałkowska (ed.), Zdrowie i choroba. Problemy teorii, diagnozy i praktyki, (pp. 227–274). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

  • Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., & Hannah, S. T. (2011). Leader development and the dark side of personality. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., Treadway, D., Thompson Heames, J., & Duke, A. (2008). Bullying in the 21st century global organization: An ethical Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others? Work and Stress, 23(4), 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., Einarsen, S., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). Organisational effects of bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 145–161). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hryniewicz, J. (2004). Polityczny i kulturowy kontekst rozwoju gospodarczego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashy, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1037–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1(1), 85–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. R., Bandelli, A. C., Spector, P. E., Borman, W. C., Nelson, C. E., & Penney, L. M. (2010). Re-examining Machiavelli: A three-dimensional model of Machiavellianism in the work-place. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(8), 1868–1896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kmiecik-Baran, K., & Rybicki, J. (2004). Mobbing—zagrożenie współczesnego miejsca pracy. Gdańsk: Pomorski Instytut Demokratyczny.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. T., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2006). When prey turns predatory. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(3), 352–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5(2), 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of bullying at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, K., Glasø, L., Pallesen, S., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Personality profiles among targets and nontargets of workplace bullying. European Psychologist, 14(3), 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, D. K., & Power, J. L. (2013). The personality traits of workplace bullies are often shared by their victims: Is there a dark side to victims? Personality and Individual Differences, 54(6), 738–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, K. D., & Christensen, L. (2007). Re-construing the relational-interdependent self-construal and its relationship with self-consistency. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Namie, G., & Namie, R. (2009). Workplace bullying: Causes, consequences and corrections. In P. Lutgen-Sandvik & B. D. Sypher (Eds.), Destructive organizational communication (pp. 41–88). New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2001). MMPI-2 configurations among victims of bullying at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Perpetrators and targets of bullying at work: Role of stress and individual differences. Violence and Victims, 22(6), 735–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). Bullying in the workplace: Definition, prevalence, antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Organization and Behavior, 13(2), 202–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoskey, J. W. (1999). Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 23(4), 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, E. H, Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omari, M. (2007). Towards dignity and respect at work: An exploration of bullying in the public sector. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia.

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilch, I. (2008). Machiavellianism, emotional intelligence and social competence. Are the Machiavellians interpersonally skilled? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 39(3), 158–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D. (2001). Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: A comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating, and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarżyńska, K. (2005). Czy jesteśmy prorozwojowi? Wartości i przekonania ludzi a dobrobyt i demokratyzacja kraju. In M. Drogosz (Ed.), Jak Polacy przegrywają, jak Polacy wygrywają (pp. 69–93). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior. doi:10.1002/job.1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. E., & Stewart, E. A. (2006). The preference to excel and its relationship to selected personality variables. Journal of Individual Psychology, 62(3), 270–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szcześniak, A. (2006). Kultura organizacyjna polskich przedsiębiorstw. In M. Bąk, P. Kulawczuk, & A. Szcześniak (Eds.), Kultura zatrudnienia w polskich przedsiębiorstwach (pp. 67–75). Warszawa: Instytut Badań nad Demokracją i Przedsiębiorstwem Prywatnym.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T. L. P., & Chen, Y. J. (2008). Intelligence vs. wisdom: The love of money, Machiavellianism, and unethical behavior across college major and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartia, M. A.-L. (2001). Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27(1), 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. J., Stylianou, A. C., & Giacalone, R. A. (2004). Individual differences in the acceptability of unethical information technology practices: The case of Machiavellianism and ethical ideology. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(3), 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojciszke, B., & Baryła, W. (2005). Kultura narzekania, czyli o psychicznych pułapkach ekspresji niezadowolenia. In M. Drogosz (Ed.), Jak Polacy przegrywają, jak Polacy wygrywają (pp. 35–53). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L., & Smye, M. (1998). Corporate abuse. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., & Einarsen, S. (2003). Individual antecedents of bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 165–184). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., Escartin, J., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2010). Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace. Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 75–105). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

  • Zapf, D., Knorz, C., & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zettler, I., Friedrich, N., & Hiblig, B. E. (2011). Dissecting work commitment: The role of Machiavellianism. Career Development International, 16(1), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zettler, I., & Solga, M. (2013). Not enough of a ‘Dark’ trait? Linking Machiavellianism to job performance. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 545–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia, ul. M. Grażyńskiego 53, 40-126, Katowice, Poland

    Irena Pilch & Elżbieta Turska

Authors
  1. Irena Pilch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elżbieta Turska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irena Pilch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pilch, I., Turska, E. Relationships Between Machiavellianism, Organizational Culture, and Workplace Bullying: Emotional Abuse from the Target’s and the Perpetrator’s Perspective. J Bus Ethics 128, 83–93 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2081-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2081-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation