Abstract
This article examines stakeholder relationships in a conflict situation. The focus of analysis is on how to understand stakeholder relationships as both ethical and strategic, and further, how the interests of different stakeholders become justified. To describe stakeholder relationships, we use media texts reporting on the case of a foreign investment project. The description shows how relationships evolve and how they constitute different episodes related to the conflict. We address the episodes by analysing stakeholder relationships and their salience. Furthermore, we examine how different stakeholder interests are justified in relation to the conflict. By providing a rich detailed qualitative analysis, we elaborate on the strategic and ethical nature of stakeholder relationships.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., & Oijala, T. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 509–516.
Calvano, L. (2008). Multinational corporations and local communities: A critical analysis of conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 793–805.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1994). A risk-based model of stakeholder theory. In: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Stakeholder Theory. University of Toronto, The Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, Toronto.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 337–359.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders. Survival reputation and success. London: Yale University Press.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.
Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373–393.
Gamson, W., & Lasch, K. (1983). The political culture of welfare policy. In S. E. Spiro (Ed.), Evaluating the welfare state. New York: Academic Press.
Garriga, E. (2009). Cooperation in stakeholder networks: Firms’ ‘Tertius Iungens role’. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 623–637.
Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 53–73.
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.
Hendry, J. R. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 79–99.
Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lamberg, J., Pajunen, K., Parvinen, P., & Savage, G. T. (2008). Stakeholder management and path dependence in organizational transitions. Management Decision, 46(6), 846–863.
Mahon, J. F., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lametrz, K. (2004). Social networks and non-market strategy. Journal of Public Affairs, 4(2), 170–189.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19–32). Helsinki: LSR.
Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377–391.
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45, 6–28.
Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (2004). Understanding stakeholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business & Society, 43, 239–267.
Roloff, J. (2008). Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focussed stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 233–250.
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.
Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.
Santana, A., Vaccaro, A., & Wood, D. J. (2009). Ethics and the networked business. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 661–681.
Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61–75.
Wiio, J. (2006). Media uudistuvassa yhteiskunnassa. Median muuttuvat pelisäännöt [Media in renewing society. The changing rules of the media]. Sitran raportteja 65, Edita, Helsinki.
Zietsma, C., & Winn, M. I. (2008). Building chains and directing flows: Strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflict. Business & Society, 47(1), 68–101.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the participants of the parallel sessions of the 11th EBEN Research Conference in Tampere, Finland, June 2010 and the 3rd Bergamo-Wharton Joint Conference in Bergamo, Italy, July 2010, as well as the anonymous reviewers and Professor R. Edward Freeman for their constructive comments on previous versions of this article. The financial support of the Academy of Finland, The Finnish Work Environmental Fund and Finnish Foundation for Economic Education for conducting this research is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kujala, J., Heikkinen, A. & Lehtimäki, H. Understanding the Nature of Stakeholder Relationships: An Empirical Examination of a Conflict Situation. J Bus Ethics 109, 53–65 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1379-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1379-2