Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility as an Organizational Attractiveness for Prospective Public Relations Practitioners

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study viewed students majoring in public relations as prospective public relations practitioners and explored their perceptions about corporate social responsibility (CSR) as their job attraction condition. The results showed that the students perceived CSR to be an important ethical fit condition of a company. One of the significant findings is that CSR can be an effective reputation management strategy for prospective employees, particularly when a company’s business is suffering. In examining the effect of CSR efforts on attitudinal and behavioral outcomes, person–organization (P–O) fit appeared to serve as a mediator between CSR performances and organizational attractiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 100 Best Companies to Work for 2008: Companies: 2008, February 4, Fortune.

  • Albinger, Heather Schmidt, and Sarah J. Freeman: 2000, ‘Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations’, Journal of Business Ethics 28(3), 243-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M., A. Arnaud and M. Schminke: 2008, ‘Individual Moral Development and Ethical Climate: The Influence of Person–Organization Fit on Job Attitudes’, Journal of Business Ethics 77(3), 323-333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, J. and G. T. Cameron: 2006, ‘Conditioning Effect of Prior Reputation on Perception of Corporate Giving’, Public Relations Review 32(2), 144-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny: 1986, ‘The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6), 1173-1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basil, D. Z., M. S. Runte, M. Easwaramoorthy and C. Barr: 2009, ‘Company Support for Employee Volunteering: A National Survey of Companies in Canada’, Journal of Business Research 85(2), 387-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, K. L., B. A. Cudmore and R. P. Hill: 2006, ‘The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior’, Journal of Business Research 59(1), 46-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I. E., P. Cunningham and M. E. Drumwright: 2007, ‘Mainstreaming Corporate Social Responsibility: Developing Markets for Virtue’, California Management Review 49(4), 132-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S. A.: 2005, ‘A Practical Model for Ethical Decision Making in Issues Management and Public Relations’, Journal of Public Relations Research 17(3), 191-216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S. A.: 2008, ‘A State of Neglect: Public Relations as ‘Corporate Conscience’ or Ethics Counsel’, Journal of Public Relations Research 20(3), 271-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braddy, P. W., A. W. Meade and C. M. Kroustalis: 2006, ‘Organizational Recruitment Website Effects on Viewers’ Perceptions of Organizational Culture’, Journal of Business and Psychology 20(4), 525-543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C. and L. L. Rodrigues: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives’, Journal of Business Ethics 69, 111-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J. and P. A. Dacin: 1997, ‘The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses’, Journal of Marketing 61(1), 68-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M. and T. A. Judge: 1994, ‘Pay Preferences and Job Search Decisions: A Person–Organization Fit Perspective’, Personnel Psychology 47(2), 317-348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M. and T. A. Judge: 1996, ‘Person–Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry’, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 67(3), 294-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, D. F. and C. A. O’Reilly III: 1990, ‘Measuring Person-Job Fit with a Profile-Comparison Process’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75(6), 648-657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, G. T., L. M. Sallot and R. A. Weaver-Lariscy: 1996, ‘Developing Standards of Professional Performance in Public Relations’, Public Relations Review 22(1), 43-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capriotti, P. and A. Moreno: 2007, ‘Corporate Citizenship and Public Relations: The Importance and Interactivity of Social Responsibility Issues on Corporate Websites’, Public Relations Review 33(1), 84-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. E.: 2000, ‘Differences Between Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Analysis’, Public Relations Review 26(3), 363-380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.: 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coldwell, D., J. Billsberry, N. van Meurs and P. J. G. Marsh: 2008, ‘The Effects of Person–Organization Ethical Fit on Employee Attraction and Retention: Towards a Testable Explanatory Model’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(4), 611-622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, D. A.: 2007, ‘The Case: Wal-Mart Public Relations in the Blogosphere’, Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22(2/3), 215-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, K. S. and E. G. Oliver: 2006, ‘Employees: The Key Link to Corporate Reputation Management’, Business Horizons 49(4), 293-302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J. and S. R. Luhtanen: 1990, ‘Collective Self-Esteem and In-Group Bias’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, 60-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman: 2008, Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Communications: Who’s Listening? Who’s Leading? What Matters Most? (Edelman, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, K. H. and J. C. Ziegert: 2005, ‘Why are Individuals Attracted to Organizations?’, Journal of Management 31(6), 901-919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. C. and W. A. Woodward: 2007, Statistical Analysis Quick Reference Guidebook: With SPSS Examples (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finegan, J. and C. Theriault: 1997, ‘The Relationship Between Personal Values and the Perception of the Corporation’s Code of Ethics’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27(8), 708-724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, T.: 2006, ‘A Delicate Equilibrium: Balancing Theory, Practice, and Outcomes,’ Journal of Public Relations Research 18(2), 191-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. and M. Shanley: 1990, ‘What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’, Academy of Management Journal 33(2), 233-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, K. K. and B. H. Reber: 2006, ‘Prepared for Practice? Student Perceptions about Requirements and Preparation for Public Relation Practice’, Public Relations Review 32, 188-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. and T. Hunt: 1984, Managing Public Relations (Hilt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. R.: 2006, ‘Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Community Relations: Measuring Relationship-Building Results’, Journal of Public Relations Research 18(1), 1-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, D. and D. Cramer: 2005, Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology (Pearson Prentice Hall, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose, A. and M. S. Thibodeaux: 1999, ‘Institutionalization of Ethics: The Perspective of Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 22(2), 133-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, B. E. and D. Payne: 2002, ‘Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 41, 297-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A. and D. M. Cable: 1997, ‘Applicant Personality, Organizational Culture, and Organization Attraction’, Personnel Psychology 50(2), 359-394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ki, E.-J. and S.-Y. Kim: 2010, ‘Ethics Statements of the PR Firms: What Do They Say?’, Journal of Business Ethics 91(2), 223-236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-S.: 2005, ‘Universalism versus Relativism in Public Relations’, Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20(4), 333-344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-Y. and B. H. Reber: 2008, ‘Public Relations’ Place in Corporate Social Responsibility: Practitioners Define Their Role’, Public Relations Review 34(4), 337-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-Y. and B. H. Reber: 2009, ‘How Public Relations Professionalism Influences Corporate Social Responsibility: A Survey of Practitioners’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86(1), 157-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, A. L.: 1996, ‘Person–Organization Fit: An Integrative Review of Its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications’, Personnel Psychology 49(1), 1-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, L.: 2007, ‘Public Trust in the PR Industry and Its Actors’, Journal of Communication Management 11(3), 222-234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manpower: 2009, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Current Trends in Australia and New Zealand’, A Manpower White Paper.

  • Meyers, L. S., G. Gamst and A. J. Guarino: 2006, Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA)

  • Mogel, L.: 2002, Making it in Public Relations: An Insider’s Guide to Career Opportunities (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C.: 1994, Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, A. and M. Meister: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Attribute Rankings’, Public Relations Review 34(1), 49–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly III, C. A., J. Chatman and D. F. Caldwell: 1991, ‘People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person–Organization Fit’, Academy of Management Journal 34(3), 487-516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirsch, J., S. Gupta and S. Grau: 2007, ‘A Framework for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Programs as a Continuum: An Exploratory Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 70(2), 125-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, M.: 2006, ‘Corporate Culture and CSR – How They Interrelate and Consequences for Successful Implementation’, in J. Hennigfeld, M. Pohl and N. Tolhurst (eds.), The ICCA Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, UK), pp. 47-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Relations Society of America and Bacon’s: 2006, 2006 State of the PR Profession Opinion Survey (PRSA, New York).

  • Public Relations Student Society of America: 2000, A Student’s Guide to Public Relations Education (Florida International University, Miami, FL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Resick, C. J., B. B. Baltes and C. W. Shantz: 2007, ‘Person–Organization Fit and Work-Related Attitudes and Decisions: Examining Interactive Effects with Job Fit and Conscientiousness’, Journal of Applied Psychology 92(5), 1446-1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, Q. M., C. J. Collins and S. Oreg: 2005, ‘The Effects of Recruitment Message Specificity on Applicant Attraction to Organizations’, Journal of Business Psychology 19(3), 319-339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M. and B. E. Ashforth: 1997, ‘A Longitudinal Investigation of the Relationships Between Job Information Sources, Applicant Perceptions of Fit, and Work Outcomes’, Personnel Psychology 50(2), 395-426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauser, J. W. I.: 2005, ‘Ethics in Business: Answering the Call’, Journal of Business Ethics 58(4), 345-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. and C. B. Bhattacharya: 2001, ‘Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Marketing Research 38(2), 225-243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. E., K. Fukukawa and G. M. Lee: 2007, ‘Values and Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social Responsibility: The U.S. versus China’, Journal of Business Ethics 70, 265-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siltaoja, M. E.: 2006, ‘Value Priorities as Combining Core Factors Between CSR and Reputation – A Qualitative Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 68, 91-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L. and K. G. Kroeck: 1994, ‘The Influence of Ethical Fit on Employee Satisfaction, Commitment and Turnover’, Journal of Business Ethics 13(12), 939-947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotorrio, L. L. and J. L. F. Sanchez: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility of the Most Highly Reputed European and North American Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 82, 379-390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G. and L. S. Fidell: 2007, Using Multivariate Statistics (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. S. and T. J. Bergmann: 1987, ‘Organizational Recruitment Activities and Applicants’ Reactions at Different Stages of the Recruitment Process’, Personnel Psychology 40(2), 261-285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. and K. A. Nelson: 2006, Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How to Do It Right (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B. and D. W. Greening: 1997, ‘Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees’, Academy of Management Journal 40(3), 658-672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, A. E.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms’, Academy of Management Review 10(3), 540-557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S. and G. Fleischman: 2008, ‘Ethics Programs, Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Job Satisfaction’, Journal of Business Ethics 77(2), 159-172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., L. Godkin and M. Lucero: 2002, ‘Ethical Context, Organizational Commitment, and Person–Organization Fit’, Journal of Business Ethics 41(4), 349-360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ruler, B.: 2005, ‘Commentary: Professionals are from Venus, Scholars are from Mars’, Public Relations Review 31(2), 159-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K.: 2006, ‘PR Career progression – The Gap Between Traditional Research and the UK Industry’s Perception’, Journal of Communication Management 10(2), 174-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16(4), 691-718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, F.: 1994, ‘Commentary: Public Relations is not yet a Profession’, Public Relations Review 20, 1-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Y., Z. Gurhan-Canli and N. Schwarz: 2006, ‘The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies with Bad Reputations’, Journal of Consumer Psychology 16(4), 377-390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soo-Yeon Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SY., Park, H. Corporate Social Responsibility as an Organizational Attractiveness for Prospective Public Relations Practitioners. J Bus Ethics 103, 639–653 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0886-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0886-x

Keywords

Navigation