Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study complements previous empirical research on the business case for corporate social responsibility (CSR) by employing hitherto unused data on corporate social performance (CSP) and proposing statistical analyses to account for bi-directional causality between social and financial performance. By allowing for differences in the importance of single components of CSP between industries, the data in this study overcome certain limitations of the databases used in earlier studies. The econometrics employed offer a rigorous way of addressing the problem of endogeneity due to simultaneous causality. Although the study’s results provide no evidence that there is a generic or universal business case for CSR, they indicate that there is a strong link between single stakeholder-related issues of CSR and financial performance. However, the analysis does not establish causality within these relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

CFP:

Corporate financial performance

CSP:

Corporate social performance

CSR:

Corporate social responsibility

IV:

Instrumental variable

KLD:

Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini & Co

OLS:

Ordinary least squares

ROE:

Return on equity

VIF:

Variance inflation factor

2SLS:

Two-stage least squares

References

  • Aerts, W. and D. Cormier: 2009, ‘Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (1), 1-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albinger, H. S. and S. J. Freeman: 2000, ‘Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations’, in: Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3), 243-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W., C. Fornell and S. K. Mazvancheryl: 2004, ‘Customer Satisfaction and Shareholder Value’, in: Journal of Marketing 68 (4), 172-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. and I. Clelland: 2004, ‘Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment’, in: Academy of Management Journal 47 (1), 93-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L.: 2007, ‘Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility’, in: Academy of Management Review 32 (3), 794-816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L. and R. M. Salomon: 2006, ‘Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship Between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’, in: Strategic Management Journal 27 (11), 1101-1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T. N. and L. Aiman-Smith: 1996, ‘Green Career Choices: The Influence of Ecological Stance of Recruiting’, in: Journal of Business and Psychology 10 (4), 445-458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., N. Guenster and R. Otten: 2004, ‘Empirical Evidence on Corporate Governance in Europe: The Effect on Stock Returns, Firm Value and Performance’, in: Journal of Asset Management 5 (2), 91-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. L., A. C. Wicks, S. Kotha and T. M. Jones: 1999, ‘Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakehoder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance’, in: Academy of Management Journal 42 (5), 488-506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, B., J. Hasung and K. Woochan: 2006, ‘Does Corporate Governance Predict Firms’ Market Values? Evidence from Korea’, in: Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22 (2), 366-413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen H. R. (1953) Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E. H. and M. Haire: 1975, ‘A Strategic Posture Towards CSR’, in: California Management Review 18 (2), 49-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C. and L. L. Rodriguez: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives’, in: Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2), 111-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. and M. Fraser: 2006, ‘Approaches and Perspectives in Social and Environmental Accounting: An Overview of the Conceptual Landscape’, in: Business Strategy and the Environment 15 (2), 103-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C. and P. K. Trivedi: 2005, ‘Microeconometrics and Applications’, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 2008, ‘A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices’, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon and D. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Respon- sibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 19– 46.

  • Chapple, W., C. J. Morrison Paul and R. Harris: 2005, ‘Manufacturing and Corporate Environmental Responsibility: Cost Implications of Voluntary Waste Minimisation’, in: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 16 (3), 347-373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. K., D. I. Levine and M. W. Toffel: 2009, ‘How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?’, in: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18 (1), 125-169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. H. and D. M. Patten: 2007, ‘The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note’, in: Accounting, Organizations & Society 32 (7/8), 639-647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K. H. and S. W. Pruitt: 1994, ‘A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s Q’, in: Financial Management 23 (3), 70-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan and L. H. P. Lang: 2002, ‘Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings’, The Journal of Finance 57(6):2741–2771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B.: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, in: Academy of Management Review 20 (1), 92-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P. L. and R. A. Wood: 1984, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’, in: Academy of Management Journal 27 (1), 42-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bakker, F. G., P. Groenewegen and F. Den Hond: 2005, ‘A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance’, in: Business & Society 44 (3), 283-317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, G., S. Hart and B. Yeung: 2000, ‘Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create Or Destroy Market Value?’, in: Management Science 46 (8), 1059-1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drobetz, W., A. Schillhofer and H. Zimmermann: 2004, ‘Corporate Governance and Expected Stock Returns: Evidence From Germany’, in: European Financial Management 10 (4), 267-293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F.: 1984, ‘The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility’, in: California Management Review 26, 53-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entine, J.: 2003, ‘The Myth of Social Investing. A Critique of Its Practice and Consequences for Corporate Social Performance Research’, in: Organization & Environment 16 (3), 352-368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, M. and A. Rappaport: 1991, Multinational Corporations and the Environment: A Survey of Global Practices, The Center for Environmental Management, Tufts University, Medford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrum, C. J. and M. Shanley: 1990, ‘What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’, in: Academy of Management Journal 33 (2), 233-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, ‘Strategic Management – A Stakeholder Approach’, (Pitman, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, in: New York Times Magazine September 13, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, L. W., G. D. Keim and R. E. Meiners: 1982, ‘Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-Profit?’, in: Academy of Management Journal 25 (1), 94-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. C.: 2005, ‘The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective’, in: Academy of Management Review 30 (4), 777-798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P. A., J. L. Ishii and A. Metrick: 2003, ‘Corporate Governance and Equity Prices’, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1), 107-155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. W. J.: 1969, ‘Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods’, in: Econometrica 37 (3), 424-438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H.: 2003, ‘Econometric Analysis’, 5. ed., New Jersey (Prentice Hall) 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D. W. and D. B. Turban: 2000, ‘Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce’, in: Business & Society 39 (3), 254-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. N.: 2003, ‘Basic Econometrics’, 4. ed., New York (McGraw-Hill) 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson and R. L. Tatham: 2006, ‘Multivariate Data Analysis’, 6. ed., New Jersey (Prentice Hall) 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamschmidt, J. and T. Dyllick: 2001, ‘ISO 14001: Profitable - Yes! But is it Eco-effective?’, in: Greener Management International 34 (1), 34-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G.: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility. An Economic and Financial Framework’, in: The Geneva Papers.

  • Heinkel, R., A. Kraus and J. Zechner: 2001, ‘The Effect of Green Investment on Corporate Behavior’, in: Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36 (4), 431-449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson D. (2001) Misguided Virtue: False Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility. London, Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J. and G. D. Keim: 2001, ‘Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line’, in: Strategic Management Journal 22 (2), 125-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J., K. Ott and G. Scherhorn (eds): 1997, Ethische Kriterien für die Bewertung von Unternehmen – Frankfurt-Hohenheimer Leitfaden (IKO, Frankfurt am Maine).

  • Igalens, J. and J.-P. Gond: 2005, ‘Measuring Corporate Social Performance in France: A Critical and Empirical Analysis of ARESE data’, in: Journal of Business Ethics 56, 131-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J. and R. Turrisi: 2003, ‘Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression’ (Sage, Thousand Oaks).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C. B., S. B. MacKenzie, P. M. Podsakoff, D. G. Mick and W. O. Bearden: 2003, ‘A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research’, in: Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2), 199-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C.: 2002, ‘Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function’, in: Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2), 235-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D. and C. P. McLaughlin: 1996, ‘The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance’, in: Management Science 42 (8), 1199-1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D. and D. C. Whybark: 1999, ‘The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance’, in: Academy of Management Journal 42 (6), 599-615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KLD Research: 2007, ‘Environmental, Social and Governance Ratings Criteria. SOCRATES – The Corporate Social Ratings Monitor’, Boston, MA, www.kld.com/research/data/KLD_Ratings_Methodology.pdf. Accessed 07/07/15.

  • Kotler, P. and N. Lee (eds): 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause, Hoboken/New Jersey (Wiley) 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer and R. Vishny: 2000, ‘Investor Protection and Corporate Governance’, in: Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1), 3-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer and R. Vishny: 2002, ‘Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation’, in: The Journal of Finance 57 (3), 1147-1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B., C. Petrovits and S. Radhakrishnan: 2006, ‘Is Doing Good Good for You? Yes, Charitable Contributions Enhance Revenue Growth’, New York University Stern School of Business Working Paper, New York.

  • Lev, B., C. Petrovits and S. Radhakrishnan: 2010, ‘Is Doing Good Good for You? How Corporate Caritable Cntributions Ehance Rvenue Gowth’, in: Strategic Management Journal 31 (2), 182-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T.: 1958, ‘The Dangers of Social Responsibility’, in: Harvard Business Review 36 (5), 41-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, E. B. and S. A. Ross: 1981, ‘Tobin’s q Ratio and Industrial Organization’, in: Journal of Business 54 (1), 1-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, J.: 1965, ‘The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets’, in: Review of Economics and Statistics 47 (1), 13-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X. and C. B. Bhattacharya: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value’, in: Journal of Marketing 70 (1), 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., O. C. Ferrell and T. M. Hult: 1999, ‘Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits’, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (4), 455-469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makni, R., C. Francoeur and F. Bellavance: 2009, ‘Causality Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms’, in: Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3), 409-422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D. and J. P. Walsh: 2003, ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (2), 268-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. and A. Crane: 2005, ‘Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization’, in: Academy of Management Review 30 (1), 166-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, J. E. and S. L. Berman: 2006, ‘Measurement of Corporate Social Action: Discovering Taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini Ratings Data’, in: Business & Society 45 (1), 20-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. W., T. P. Lyon and S. C. Hackett: 2000, ‘Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism’, in: Journal of Law and Economics 43 (2), 583-618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, J. J. and H. Servaes: 1990, ‘Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value’, in: Journal of Financial Economics 27 (5), 595-612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2000, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?’, in: Strategic Management Journal 21 (5), 603-609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2001, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective’, in: Academy of Management Review 26 (1), 117-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H.: 1983, ‘The Case for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in: Journal of Business Strategy 4 (2), 3-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithas, S., M. S. Krishnan and C. Fornell: 2005, ‘Why Do Customer Relationship Management Applications Affect Customer Satisfaction?’, in: Journal of Marketing 69 (4), 201-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., D. J. Webb and K. E. Harris: 2001, ‘Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior’, in: The Journal of Consumer Affairs 35 (1), 45-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossin, J.: 1966, ‘Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market’, in: Econometrica 34 (4), 768-783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M.: 2008, Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Research Synthesis, in Crane, Andrew/McWilliams, Abagail/Matten, Dirk/et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford (Oxford University Press) 2008, 113-134

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., F. L. Schmidt and S. L. Rynes: 2003, ‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis’, in: Organization Studies 24 (3), 403-441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsato, R.: 2006, ‘Competitive Environmental Strategies: When Does It Pay to be Green?’, in: California Management Review 48 (2), 127-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J.: 2006, ‘Using Corporate Social Responsibility as Insurance for Financial Performance’, in: California Management Review 48 (2), 52-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‘The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’, in: Harvard Business Review 80 (12), 56-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, in: Harvard Business Review 84 (12), 78-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde: 1995, ‘Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship’, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (24), 97-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Projektgruppe Ethisch-Ökologisches Rating Frankfurt- Hohenheim and oekom research AG (eds.): 2002, Ethisch-Ölologisches Rating. Der Frankfurt-Hohenheimer Leitfaden und seine Umsetzung durch das Corporate Responsibility-Rating, Federführung: Johannes Hofman u. Claudia DÖpfner, Vol. 7, 2. ed., (oekom verlag, München) 2002.

  • Pruzan, P.: 1998, ‘From Control to Values-Based Management and Accountability’, in: Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13), 1379-1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T. J. and S. L. Berman: 2000, ‘A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance’, in: Business & Society 39 (4), 397-418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, B. M., K. Muralidhar, J. J. Brown and K. Paul: 2001, ‘An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective’, in: Journal of Business Ethics 32 (2), 143-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, B., M., K. Muralidhar and K. Paul: 1998, ‘The Development of the Systematic, Aggregate Measure of Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Management 24(1):119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V. and P. A. Fouts: 1997, ‘A Resource-based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability’, in: Academy of Management Journal 40 (3), 534-559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2011, ‘The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy’, Journal of Management Studies 48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x

  • Scherer, A. G., G. Palazzo and D. Matten: 2009, ‘Introduction to the Special Issue: Globalization as a Challenge for Business Responsibilities’, in: Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (3), 327-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreck, P.: 2009, ‘The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility. Understanding and Measuring Economic Impacts of Corporate Social Performance’, (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaiger, M.: 2004, ‘Components and Parameters of Corporate Reputation - an Empirical Study’, in: Schmalenbach Business Review 56 (1), 46-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. and C. B. Bhattacharya: 2001, ‘Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility’, in: Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2), 225-243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F.: 1964, ‘Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk’, in: Journal of Finance 19 (3), 425-442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P.: 1995, ‘Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society’, in: Academy of Management Review 20 (1), 118-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M. and D. S. Alcorn: 1991, ‘Cause Marketing: A New Direction in the Marketing of Corporate Social Responsibility’, in: Journal of Consumer Marketing 8 (3), 19-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, B. H.: 1978, ‘Market Risk, Accounting Data, and Companies’ Pollution Control Records’, in: Journal of Business, Finance, and Accounting 5 (1), 67-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, A. K. and A. C. Inkpen: 2004, ‘The Corporate Objective Revisited’, in: Organization Science 15 (4), 350-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SustainAbility (eds): 2006, Buried Treasures. Uncovering the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability (L&S Printing, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P.: 2000, Business Responsibility for Sustainable Development. UNRISD Occasional Paper No. 2.

  • Waddock, S. A.: 2003, ‘Myths and Realities of Social Investing’, in: Organization & Environment 16 (3), 369-380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. and S. B. Graves: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance - Financial Performance Link’, in: Strategic Management Journal 18 (4), 309-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H.: 1980, ‘A Heteroscedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test of Heteroscedasticity’, in: Econometrica 48 (4), 817-818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, in: Academy of Management Review 16 (4), 691-718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M.: 2002, ‘Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data’, Cambridge, Mass. (MIT Press) 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Production Management and Managerial Accounting, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Ludwigstr. 28, 80539, Munich, Germany

    Philipp Schreck

Authors
  1. Philipp Schreck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Schreck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schreck, P. Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis. J Bus Ethics 103, 167–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0867-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0867-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation