Skip to main content
Log in

CSR Information Disclosure on the Web: A Context-Based Approach Analysing the Influence of Country of Origin and Industry Sector

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become a much-discussed subject in the business world. The Internet has become one of the main tools for CSR information disclosure, allowing companies to publicise more information less expensively and faster than ever before. As a result, corporations are increasingly concerned with communicating ethically and responsibly to the diversity of stakeholders through the web. This paper addresses the main question as whether CSR information disclosure on corporate websites is influenced by country of origin and/or industry sector. Analysing the websites of 127 corporations from emerging countries, such as Brazil, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Thailand and South Africa, it becomes evident that both country of origin and industry sector have a significant influence over CSR information disclosure on the web (CSRIDOW). Based on the data studied, country of origin has a stronger influence over CSRIDOW than industry sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akatu, Instituto para o Consumo Consciente: 2006, Responsabilidade social das empresas: percepção do consumidor brasileiro – Pesquisa 2005 (São Paulo, Brasil)

  • Altheide, D. L.: 1996, Qualitative Media Analysis (Sage, Newbury Park)

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, M. T.: 2004, ‹Publicidade cidadã: como comunicar responsabilidade social empresarial’, in Responsabilidade social das empresas: a contribuição das universidades 3, 334–384 (Peirópolis, São Paulo)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, K., D. Matten and J. Moon: 2004, ‹The adoption of voluntary codes of conduct in MNCs: a three-country comparative study’, Business and Society Review 109(4), 449–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R.: 1953, Social responsibilities of the businessman (Harper & Row, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C. and L. L. Rodrigues: 2006, ‹Communication of corporate social responsibility by portuguese banks: a legitimacy theory perspective’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal 11(3), 232–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‹A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance’, Academy of Management Review 4, 17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W. and J. Moon: 2005, ‹Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting’, Business and Society 44(4), 415–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P. and G. Taylor: 2001, ‹Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation in China’, Journal of International Business Studies 32(3), 439–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J.: 2004, ‹Corporate responsibility: the communication challenge’, Journal of Communication Management 9(2), 108–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decarlo, S.: 2006, ‹The World’s 2000 Largest Public Companies’, Forbes Special Report. http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/03/29/06f2k_worlds-largest-public-companies_land.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2007

  • Esrock, S. L. and G. B. Leichty.: 1998, ‹Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda-setting?’, Public Relations Review 24(3), 305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esrock, S. L. and G. B. Leichty.: 2000, ‹Organization of corporate web page: publics and functions’, Public Relations Review 26(3), 327–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farache, F., K. Perks and A. Berry: 2007, ‹Corporate social responsibility communication: how corporations in the oil industry publicise their actions in the UK and Brazil’, International Journal of Business Research 7(2), 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Farache, F., L. S. O. Wanderley, K. Perks and J. M. Sousa Filho: 2007, ‹Responsabilidade social empresarial na web: estratégias de divulgação adotadas pelas maiores empresas francesas no Brasil e na Franca’, Revista Gestao.Org 5(3), 414–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic management: a stakeholder approach (Pitman, Boston)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago, Chicago)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. B.: 1998, Corporate communications for executives (State University of New York Press, Albany)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschland, H. M.: 2006, ‹A BSR Benchmarking: The Goldilocks Conundrum: Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility’, in Corporate Responsibility and Global Business: Implications for Corporate and Marketing Strategy Conference (London), 13–14 July 2006

  • Holme, R. and P. Watts: 2000, ‹Corporate social responsibility: making good business sense’, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, T. and P. Bansal: 2007, ‹How standard is standardized MNC global environmental communication?’, Journal of Business Ethics 71(1), 135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, J. G.: 2001, ‹Reputation management: the new face of corporate public relations?’, Public Relations Review 27(3), 247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D.: 2007, ‹The case for strategic corporate social responsibility in developing countries’, Business and Society Review 112(1), 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. and R. Mirshak: 2007, ‹Corporate social responsibility (CSR): theory and practice in a developing country context’, Journal of Business Ethics 72(3), 243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M.: 2001, Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Quixotic Dream or Confident Expectation? Program Paper No. 6 (United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Lewis, S.: 2001, ‹Measuring corporate reputation’, Corporate Communication: An International Journal 6(1), 31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luetkenhorst, W.: 2004, ‹Corporate social responsibility and the development agenda’, Intereconomics 39(3), 157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., and O. C. Ferrell: 2004, ‹Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32(1), 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K.: 2006, Pesquisa de marketing: uma orientação aplicada (Bookman, São Paulo)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M.: 2006, ‹Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: on the role of external stakeholders for member identification’, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(2), 171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M. and M. Schultz: 2006, ‹Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies’, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4), 323–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollach, I.: 2003, Communicating corporate ethics on the World Wide Web: a discourse analysis of selected company web sites (Peter Lang Publishing, Frankfurt)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. B. and I. Pollach: 2005, ‹The perils and opportunities of communicating corporate ethics’, Journal of Marketing Management 21(3), 267–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J., R. P. Hill and D. Martin: 2003, ‹Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: a view from the world’s most successful firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 48(2), 175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa Filho, J. M. and L. S. O. Wanderley: 2007, ‹Divulgação da responsabilidade social empresarial: como os websites empresariais vêm sendo utilizados por empresas de energia e varejo’, Cadernos EBAPE 5(2)

  • Sweeney, L. and Coughan J.: 2008, ‹Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory’, Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD: 1999, Brazilian Stakeholder Dialogue on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) & Sustainability Through the Market (SMT) (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilian Soares Outtes Wanderley.

Additional information

Lilian S. Outtes Wanderley is a Professor Adjunto at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco/UFPE in Recife/Brazil (PROPAD/DCA/CCSA/UFPE). She holds a PhD in Management Studies from the University of Cambridge/UK, a MSc in Management from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/UFRGS - Porto Alegre/Brazil and a BSc in Business Administration from UFPE. Her research interests include Corporate Social Responsibility and Development Studies.

Rafael Lucian is a researcher on Marketing and Corporate Social Responsibility. Mr. Lucian holds a MSc in Management (PROPAD/DCA/CCSA/UFPE) and a BSc in Business Administration from Universidade Federal de Pernambuco/UFPE in Recife/Brazil.

Francisca Farache is a doctoral student at Brighton Business School/UK, where she is a lecturer on Marketing. Francisca holds a MA in Marketing from the same institution and a BSc in Communication and Media Studies from UFPE in Recife/Brazil. Her research interests are Corporate Social Responsibility, Communication and Advertising.

José Milton de Sousa Filho is a researcher on Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility, Sustainability and Strategic Management. Mr. Sousa Filho holds a MSc in Management from UFPE in Recife/Brazil (PROPAD/DCA/CCSA/UFPE) and a BSc in Business Administration from Universidade Federal do Ceará/UFC in Fortaleza/Brazil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wanderley, L.S.O., Lucian, R., Farache, F. et al. CSR Information Disclosure on the Web: A Context-Based Approach Analysing the Influence of Country of Origin and Industry Sector. J Bus Ethics 82, 369–378 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9892-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9892-z

Key Words

Navigation